Leukocyte-rich PRP vs Leukocyte-poor PRP for the Treatment of Knee Cartilage Degeneration: a Randomized Controlled Trial
PRP014
1 other identifier
interventional
192
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) is the most exploited biologic agents currently used for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of different joints, in particular knee OA. In previous studies, it has been showed its potential to reduce pain and improve functional status in patients treated by simple intra-articular injections. However, there are several PRP formulation currently available in clinical use, and therefore it is very difficult to compare data coming from trials using different products. The most debated aspect concerning PRP formulation is the role of leukocytes, which might stimulate an early inflammatory response in the joint due to the release of metalloproteases and other pro-inflammatory cytokines. The investigators hypothesized that the presence of leukocytes in PRP could be clinically relevant in terms of outcome, so the present double blind randomized controlled trial was designed to compare leukocyte-rich and leukocyte-poor PRP injections for the treatment of knee OA. A power analysis has been performed for the primary endpoint of IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) subjective score improvement at the 12-month follow-up for PRP. From a pilot study, a standard deviation of 15.2 points was found. With an alpha error of 0.05, a beta error of 0.2 and a minimal clinically significant difference of 6.7 points corresponding at 1/3 of the documented mean improvement, the minimum sample size was 83 for each group. Considering a possible drop out of 15%, 96 patients per group are required for total 192 patients, selected according to well-defined inclusion criteria (see 'Eligibility criteria' section). Patients are then assigned to two different treatment groups, according to a randomization list. The first group of treatment consists of three weekly intra-articular injections of autologous leukocyte-rich PRP, whereas the second group of patients will be treated by three intra-articular injections of leukocyte-poor PRP. PRP will be obtained with the following procedure: a 300-ml autologous venous blood sample will undergo 2 centrifugations (the first at 1480 rpm for 6 minutes to separate erythrocytes, and a second at 3400 rpm for 15 minutes to concentrate platelets) to produced 20 ml of leukocyte-rich PRP. In case of patients allocated to receive leukocyte-poor PRP, a special filter will be then used to separate leukocytes and obtain leukocyte-poor PRP. The total amount of PRP will be divided into 4 small units of 5 ml each. One unit is sent to the laboratory for analysis of platelet concentration and for a quality test, 3 units are stored at -30° C. One week after the PRP production, the injective treatment starts, with 3 weekly injections. At the moment of the injection the syringe is properly covered to prevent the patient from discovering the substance he was receiving. After the injection, patients are sent home with instructions to limit the use of the leg for at least 24 h and to use cold therapy/ice on the affected area to relieve pain. During this period, the use of non-steroidal medication is forbidden. Patients are prospectively evaluated basally and at 2, 6, and 12 months of follow-up using clinical subjective scores and objective parameters to determine clinical outcome (see 'Outcome measure' section). Patient satisfaction and adverse events will be also reported. All the clinical evaluations are performed by a medical staff not involved in the injective procedure, in order to keep the study double blinded. At the end of the study, the nature of the injected substance is revealed to the patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Sep 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 27, 2021
CompletedAugust 4, 2021
August 1, 2021
1 year
September 30, 2016
August 3, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
IKDC (International knee documentation committee) score trend over time
basal (i.e. pre-treatment), 1 month, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (4)
KOOS (Knee Outcome Osteoarthritis Score) trend over time
basal (i.e. pre-treatment), 1 month, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment
VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) for Pain trend over time
basal (i.e. pre-treatment), 1 month, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment
Tegner Score trend over time
basal (i.e. pre-treatment), 1 month, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment
Adverse events report during follow-up period
ba1 month, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment
Study Arms (2)
Leukocyte-rich PRP group
EXPERIMENTALThree weekly knee intra-articular injections of leukocyte-rich PRP
Leukocyte-poor PRP group
EXPERIMENTALThree weekly knee intra-articular injections of leukocyte-poor PRP
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients affected by mono-lateral symptomatic knee articular degenerative pathology with history of chronic (for at least 4 months) pain or swelling;
- imaging findings of degenerative changes of the joint (osteoarthritis or chondropathy with Kellgren Lawrence Score from 0 to 3 at X-ray evaluation).
You may not qualify if:
- age \> 80 years;
- Kellgren-Lawrence score at X-ray evaluation \> 3;
- major axial deviation (varus \>5° , valgus \> 5°),
- systemic disorders such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, haematological diseases (coagulopathy), severe cardiovascular diseases, infections, immunodepression;
- patients in therapy with anticoagulants or antiaggregants;
- use of NSAIDs in the 5 days before blood donation;
- patients with Hb values \< 11 g/dl and platelet values \< 150,000/mmc.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40136, Italy
Related Publications (11)
Di Matteo B, Loibl M, Andriolo L, Filardo G, Zellner J, Koch M, Angele P. Biologic agents for anterior cruciate ligament healing: A systematic review. World J Orthop. 2016 Sep 18;7(9):592-603. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i9.592. eCollection 2016 Sep 18.
PMID: 27672573BACKGROUNDvan Drumpt RA, van der Weegen W, King W, Toler K, Macenski MM. Safety and Treatment Effectiveness of a Single Autologous Protein Solution Injection in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Biores Open Access. 2016 Aug 1;5(1):261-8. doi: 10.1089/biores.2016.0014. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27668131BACKGROUNDMlynarek RA, Kuhn AW, Bedi A. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Orthopedic Sports Medicine. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Jul-Aug;45(5):290-326.
PMID: 27552452BACKGROUNDSanchez M, Delgado D, Sanchez P, Muinos-Lopez E, Paiva B, Granero-Molto F, Prosper F, Pompei O, Perez JC, Azofra J, Padilla S, Fiz N. Combination of Intra-Articular and Intraosseous Injections of Platelet Rich Plasma for Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4868613. doi: 10.1155/2016/4868613. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
PMID: 27462609BACKGROUNDMariani E, Canella V, Cattini L, Kon E, Marcacci M, Di Matteo B, Pulsatelli L, Filardo G. Leukocyte-Rich Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections Do Not Up-Modulate Intra-Articular Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines in the Osteoarthritic Knee. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 3;11(6):e0156137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156137. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27258008BACKGROUNDSadabad HN, Behzadifar M, Arasteh F, Behzadifar M, Dehghan HR. Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Hyaluronic Acid for treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Electron Physician. 2016 Mar 25;8(3):2115-22. doi: 10.19082/2115. eCollection 2016 Mar.
PMID: 27123220BACKGROUNDYang J, Lu Y, Guo A. Platelet-rich plasma protects rat chondrocytes from interleukin-1beta-induced apoptosis. Mol Med Rep. 2016 Nov;14(5):4075-4082. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5767. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
PMID: 27665780BACKGROUNDYin WJ, Xu HT, Sheng JG, An ZQ, Guo SC, Xie XT, Zhang CQ. Advantages of Pure Platelet-Rich Plasma Compared with Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Plasma in Treating Rabbit Knee Osteoarthritis. Med Sci Monit. 2016 Apr 17;22:1280-90. doi: 10.12659/msm.898218.
PMID: 27086145BACKGROUNDSmyth NA, Haleem AM, Ross KA, Hannon CP, Murawski CD, Do HT, Kennedy JG. Platelet-Rich Plasma May Improve Osteochondral Donor Site Healing in a Rabbit Model. Cartilage. 2016 Jan;7(1):104-11. doi: 10.1177/1947603515599190.
PMID: 26958322BACKGROUNDSmith PA. Intra-articular Autologous Conditioned Plasma Injections Provide Safe and Efficacious Treatment for Knee Osteoarthritis: An FDA-Sanctioned, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):884-91. doi: 10.1177/0363546515624678. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
PMID: 26831629BACKGROUNDDi Martino A, Boffa A, Andriolo L, Romandini I, Altamura SA, Cenacchi A, Roverini V, Zaffagnini S, Filardo G. Leukocyte-Rich versus Leukocyte-Poor Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(3):609-617. doi: 10.1177/03635465211064303. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
PMID: 35103547DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Berardo Di Matteo, MD
I Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy
- STUDY CHAIR
Alessandro Di Martino, MD
I Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy
- STUDY CHAIR
Francesco Tentoni, MD
I Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy
- STUDY CHAIR
Alice Roffi, BA
Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizaveta Kon, MD
I Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2016
First Posted
October 4, 2016
Study Start
September 26, 2016
Primary Completion
September 26, 2017
Study Completion
May 27, 2021
Last Updated
August 4, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share