The Effects of Acetylsalicylic Acid on Immunoparalysis Following Human Endotoxemia
SALYCENDO
3 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: The last years, research focus has moved to immunostimulatory agents in order to restore or increase the functionality of the immune system during sepsis-induced immunoparalysis. Epidemiologic data show that prehospital use of low dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is associated with improved outcome of sepsis. Experimental data indicate that ASA exerts pro-inflammatory effects during systemic inflammation. However, it remains to be determined whether treatment with ASA improves immune function once immunoparalysis has developed and whether prehospital use of low dose ASA prevents the development of immunoparalysis. In the former case, ASA is a potential immunostimulatory therapy that can treat sepsis-induced immunoparalysis. In the latter case, ASA may have a broader indication as an immunomodulating agent. Taken together, ASA might be a promising, cheap, well-known, and globally available agent to reduce the incidence of secondary infections and improve patient outcome in sepsis. Objective:
- To determine whether acetylsalicylic acid treatment can reverse endotoxin tolerance, which is expressed as a decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokine levels between the first and second endotoxin challenge.
- To determine whether acetylsalicylic acid prophylaxis can prevent endotoxin tolerance, which is expressed as a decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokine levels between the first and second endotoxin challenge. Study design: Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled pilot study in 30 healthy male volunteers during repeated experimental endotoxemia. All subjects will receive a 14 day course of study medication (low-dose ASA or placebo) and undergo experimental endotoxemia (lipopolysacharide (LPS), E.Coli type O113) on day 7 and on day 14. LPS is administrated using an initial bolus of 1ng/kg followed by continuous infusion at 1ng/kg/hr during 3 hours. Subjects are randomized in three study arms:
- Treatment group: 7 days placebo / first endotoxemia / 7 days ASA 80 mg (loading dose on first day of 160mg) / second endotoxemia
- Prophylaxis group: 7 days ASA 80 mg (loading dose on first day of 160mg) / first endotoxemia / 7 days ASA 80 mg / second endotoxemia
- Placebo group: 7 days placebo / first endotoxemia / 7 days placebo / second endotoxemia
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 4, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2017
CompletedJuly 31, 2019
September 1, 2016
3 months
September 26, 2016
July 30, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in concentration plasma TNFalpha (pg/ml)
measured with Luminex assay
Measured after the first and second LPS-challenge (on day 7 and day 14)
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Change in concentration plasma IL-6 (pg/ml)
Measured after the first and second LPS-challenge (on day 7 and day 14)
Change in concentration plasma IL-8 (pg/ml)
Measured after the first and second LPS-challenge (on day 7 and day 14)
Change in plasma concentration of IL-10 (pg/ml)
Measured after the first and second LPS-challenge (on day 7 and day 14)
Change in plasma concentration of IL-1RA (pg/ml)
Measured after the first and second LPS-challenge (on day 7 and day 14)
Change in plasma concentration of IL-1beta (pg/ml)
Measured after the first and second LPS-challenge (on day 7 and day 14)
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Treatment group
EXPERIMENTAL7 day treatment with placebo - first LPS challenge - 7 day treatment with ASA 80 mg (with a loading dose of 160 mg on the first day) - second LPS challenge
Prophylaxis group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR7 day treatment with ASA 80 mg (with a loading dose of 160 mg on the first day) - first LPS challenge - 7 day treatment with ASA (no loading dose on first day) - second LPS challenge
Placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATOR7 day treatment with placebo - first LPS challenge - 7 day treatment with placebo - second LPS challenge
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent
- Age ≥18 and ≤35 yrs
- Male
- Healthy (as confirmed by medical history, examination, ECG, blood sampling)
You may not qualify if:
- Use of any medication
- Use of COX-inhibitors within 6 weeks prior to the first endotoxemia day
- Smoking
- Known anaphylaxis or hypersensitivity to acetylsalicylic acid or non-investigational products
- History or signs of atopic syndrome (asthma, rhinitis with medication and/or eczema)
- History of peptic ulcer disease
- History or signs of hematological disease
- Thrombocytopenia (\<150\*10\^9/ml) or anemia (hemoglobin \< 8.0 mmol/L)
- History of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
- History of intracranial hemorrhage
- History, signs or symptoms of cardiovascular disease, in particular:
- Previous spontaneous vagal collapse
- History of atrial or ventricular arrhythmia
- Cardiac conduction abnormalities on the ECG consisting of a 2nd degree atrioventricular block or a complete left bundle branch block
- Hypertension (defined as RR systolic \> 160 or RR diastolic \> 90)
- +11 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500HB, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Eleveld N, Hoedemaekers CWE, van Kaam CR, Leijte GP, van den Brule JMD, Pickkers P, Aries MJH, Maurits NM, Elting JWJ. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy-Derived Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation in Experimental Human Endotoxemia-An Exploratory Study. Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 10;12:695705. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.695705. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34566840DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2016
First Posted
October 4, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2017
Last Updated
July 31, 2019
Record last verified: 2016-09