Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System - Android Devices User Performance Study Report
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System as compared to a reference method (Yellow Springs Instrument 2300 STAT Plus) and to evaluate the usability of the device when used by laypersons.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
Started Jul 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 13, 2021
CompletedApril 13, 2021
March 1, 2021
Same day
September 20, 2016
August 19, 2020
April 11, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Accuracy of Glucose Concentrations (%)
Accuracy acceptability is defined as follows: Ninety-five percent (95%) of the individual glucose results shall fall within +/-15 mg/dL of the results of the Dario's measurement at glucose concentrations \< 75 mg/dL and within +/- 20% at glucose concentrations greater than or equal to 75 mg/dL. The accuracy of the Dario Blood Glucose Monitoring System when used with Android operating system smart mobile devices was assessed against the Yellow Springs Instrument 2300 STAT Plus.
1 Day
Average Rank of the Indication of "How Would Rate Your Success in Operating Dario BGMS"
Using a scale of 1-5 where 1-completely fails, 2-unsuccessful, 3-Partially successful, 4-successful, 5-very successful. Average rank of 3.5 ('average'/'successful') or above in question #2 - How would you rate your success in operating Dario™ BGMS?
1 Day
Average Rank of the Indication of "How Easy Was it to Operate the Dario™ BGMS on the First Time?"
Using a scale of 1-5 where 1-very hard, 2-hard, 3-average, 4-easy, 5-very easy. An average rank of 3 ('average') or above in question #3 - How easy was it to operate the Dario™ BGMS on the first time?
1 Day
Percent of Participants Responding 'YES' on the Question "Did You Successfully Obtain Measurement Result Using the Dario™ BGMS?"
The acceptance criteria for this question is: at least ninety percent (90%) need to answer 'Yes' on question #1 - Did you successfully obtain measurement result using the Dario™ BGMS? 100% of subjects (102 of 102) answered "Yes" to this question.
1 Day
Study Arms (1)
One Arm
OTHERThis is a comparative diagnostic study, no interventional actions are being taken.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject has Type 1 or Type II diabetes
- Subject speaks and reads English proficiently
- Subject is able and agrees to sign the informed consent form (minor subjects must be accompanied by a parent or legal guardian to provide consent for their participation in the study)
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has medical training or works in the field of blood glucose monitoring systems.
- Subject is critically ill.
- Subject has an impairment that prevents him/her from following the study procedures.
- Subject has any condition that the Principal Investigator believes may interfere in the subject's participation in the study.
- Hematocrit levels outside the range of 20%-60%.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Barbara Davis Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Satish K. Garg
- Organization
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2016
First Posted
September 22, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 13, 2021
Results First Posted
April 13, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03