Botulinum Toxin A Single Blind Split-Face Randomized Pilot Study
A Single Blind, Split-Face, Randomized, Pilot Study Comparing the Effects of Intradermal and Intramuscular Injection of Two Commercially Available Botulinum Toxin A Formulas to Reduce Signs of Facial Aging
1 other identifier
interventional
10
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
A 16-week single-blind, split-face, randomized study. Each patient served as their own control, receiving onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA randomized to either the left or right side of the face. Patients received intradermal BTXA injections at week 0 and intramuscular BTXA injections at week 2. The objective is to examine the effectiveness of intradermal botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) injection in improving skin texture and midface lift while reducing pore size and sebum production, as well as investigate the differences in effectiveness between onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA using intradermal and intramuscular injection methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Sep 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 13, 2017
CompletedOctober 13, 2017
September 1, 2017
4 months
September 8, 2016
September 21, 2016
September 12, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Blinded Assessment: Overall Change in Facial Wrinkles From Baseline to Week 2 as Assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale Based on Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs
Blinded assessments of overall change in facial wrinkles from baseline to week 2 based on pre and post treatment photographs. Measured on a 5 point scale which is a static assessment of wrinkle severity. 0=wrinkles absent (minimum), 1=shallow but visible wrinkles, 2=fine lines slight indentation, 3=clear indentation 0-1mm deep, 4=moderate indentation 1-2mm deep, 5=deep indentation \>2mm deep (maximum). A higher value = a worse outcome (more severe wrinkles). Includes 9 subscales measured on the same scale described above. Subscales measure wrinkle severity in the left and right forehead region, left and right cheek region, left and right crow's feet region, left and right upper lip region, and glabellar region. All scores were computed by averaging subscale ratings.
Baseline and 2 weeks
Blinded Assessment: Overall Change in Facial Wrinkles From Baseline to Week 4 as Assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale Based on Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs
Blinded assessments of overall change in facial wrinkles from baseline to week 4 based on pre and post treatment photographs. Measured on a 5 point scale which is a static assessment of wrinkle severity. 0=wrinkles absent (minimum), 1=shallow but visible wrinkles, 2=fine lines slight indentation, 3=clear indentation 0-1mm deep, 4=moderate indentation 1-2mm deep, 5=deep indentation \>2mm deep (maximum). A higher value = a worse outcome (more severe wrinkles). Includes 9 subscales measured on the same scale described above. Subscales measure wrinkle severity in the left and right forehead region, left and right cheek region, left and right crow's feet region, left and right upper lip region, and glabellar region. All scores were computed by averaging subscale ratings.
Baseline and 4 weeks
Blinded Assessment: Overall Change in Facial Wrinkles From Baseline to Week 16 as Assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale Based on Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs
Blinded assessments of overall change in facial wrinkles from baseline to week 16 based on pre and post treatment photographs. Measured on a 5 point scale which is a static assessment of wrinkle severity. 0=wrinkles absent (minimum), 1=shallow but visible wrinkles, 2=fine lines slight indentation, 3=clear indentation 0-1mm deep, 4=moderate indentation 1-2mm deep, 5=deep indentation \>2mm deep (maximum). A higher value = a worse outcome (more severe wrinkles). Includes 9 subscales measured on the same scale described above. Subscales measure wrinkle severity in the left and right forehead region, left and right cheek region, left and right crow's feet region, left and right upper lip region, and glabellar region. All scores were computed by averaging subscale ratings.
Baseline and 16 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Treatment Arm A
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe first treatment group received onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) on the right side of their face and abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) on the left side of their face. Baseline treatment at Week 0 included the intradermal injection of onabotulinumtoxinA on one side of the face and abobotulinumtoxinA on the other. Patients were treated at Week 2 with traditional intramuscular injections consisting of onabotulinumtoxinA on the same side of their face as at Week 0 and abobotulinumtoxinA on the other side. Patients were treated based on individual need, and thus the treatment volumes were not controlled or standardized.
Treatment Arm B
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe second treatment group received abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) on the right side of their face and onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) on the left side of their face. Baseline treatment at Week 0 included the intradermal injection of onabotulinumtoxinA on one side of the face and abobotulinumtoxinA on the other. Patients were treated at Week 2 with traditional intramuscular injections consisting of onabotulinumtoxinA on the same side of their face as at Week 0 and abobotulinumtoxinA on the other side. Patients were treated based on individual need, and thus the treatment volumes were not controlled or standardized.
Interventions
OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox; Allergan) was approved by the FDA in 2002. Intervention administered by study nurse. Intradermal administered in a regular 1 cm2 grid across the cheeks and forehead. Intramuscular administered as per normal practice.
AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport; Galderma) was approved by the FDA in 2009. Intervention administered by study nurse. Intradermal administered in a regular 1 cm2 grid across the cheeks and forehead. Intramuscular administered as per normal practice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female subjects between ages of 35 to 65 years (inclusive) who exhibit static wrinkles in the following areas: glabella (forehead frowns), periorbital area (crows feet). Static wrinkles in additional areas of the face are also acceptable.
- Subject is willing to maintain the same skin care regimen throughout the study and has already maintained this skin care regime for 4 weeks prior to baseline.
- The subject is able to comply with study procedures and instructions and is committed to attend all study visits within the given timelines.
- Subject is judged to be a good candidate by study nurse upon identification of dynamic and/or static wrinkles in the areas of movement, and with a moderate amount of skin laxity.
- Subject is willing to use contraception
- A signed informed consent form by a subject able to give consent, prior to any study procedures are performed.
You may not qualify if:
- Sensitivity and/or contraindications to botulinum toxin A other ingredients contained in the botulinum toxin A products.
- Any medical condition, in the opinion of the investigator, that would interfere with safety or any study procedures (e.g. auto-immune disease, history of severe allergies, hypertrophic scars, immunotherapeutic treatment, inflammatory or infectious complaints at injection sites, unable to give consent)
- Treatment with botulinum toxin A injections in the neck or face within 1 year of baseline treatment
- Treatment with facial fillers less than 1 year prior to baseline
- Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant, breastfeeding or plan to get pregnant during the course of the study.
- Previous treatment with Lasers, Ultrasound Technology or Radio Frequency on the face and/or neck within 1 year prior to baseline.
- Treatment with Accutane (isotretinoin) or other oral medications for acne during 1 year prior to baseline.
- The use of anti-aging products containing retinol
- Known allergy to cow's milk protein
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Sapra P, Demay S, Sapra S, Khanna J, Mraud K, Bonadonna J. A Single-blind, Split-face, Randomized, Pilot Study Comparing the Effects of Intradermal and Intramuscular Injection of Two Commercially Available Botulinum Toxin A Formulas to Reduce Signs of Facial Aging. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017 Feb;10(2):34-44. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
PMID: 28367260DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Limitations include small sample size and not having objective assessments. Insignificant p value could mean no difference detected or the sample was too small to detect difference. Blinded assessor made subjective assessments based on the photos.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Shantel Demay
- Organization
- ICLS
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sheetal Sapra, MD, FRCPC
ICLS Dermatology & Plastic Surgery
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Dermatology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2016
First Posted
September 20, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 13, 2017
Results First Posted
October 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Photographs of individual participants are included in presentations and publications. Consent to reproduce photographs has been obtained from all participants. No other IPD is planned to be shared unless requested.