NCT02907268

Brief Summary

A 16-week single-blind, split-face, randomized study. Each patient served as their own control, receiving onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA randomized to either the left or right side of the face. Patients received intradermal BTXA injections at week 0 and intramuscular BTXA injections at week 2. The objective is to examine the effectiveness of intradermal botulinum toxin type A (BTXA) injection in improving skin texture and midface lift while reducing pore size and sebum production, as well as investigate the differences in effectiveness between onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA using intradermal and intramuscular injection methods.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Shorter than P25 for phase_2

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2014

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 8, 2016

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 20, 2016

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 13, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 13, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 8, 2016

Results QC Date

September 21, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 12, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

botulinum toxin type A, intradermal

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Blinded Assessment: Overall Change in Facial Wrinkles From Baseline to Week 2 as Assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale Based on Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs

    Blinded assessments of overall change in facial wrinkles from baseline to week 2 based on pre and post treatment photographs. Measured on a 5 point scale which is a static assessment of wrinkle severity. 0=wrinkles absent (minimum), 1=shallow but visible wrinkles, 2=fine lines slight indentation, 3=clear indentation 0-1mm deep, 4=moderate indentation 1-2mm deep, 5=deep indentation \>2mm deep (maximum). A higher value = a worse outcome (more severe wrinkles). Includes 9 subscales measured on the same scale described above. Subscales measure wrinkle severity in the left and right forehead region, left and right cheek region, left and right crow's feet region, left and right upper lip region, and glabellar region. All scores were computed by averaging subscale ratings.

    Baseline and 2 weeks

  • Blinded Assessment: Overall Change in Facial Wrinkles From Baseline to Week 4 as Assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale Based on Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs

    Blinded assessments of overall change in facial wrinkles from baseline to week 4 based on pre and post treatment photographs. Measured on a 5 point scale which is a static assessment of wrinkle severity. 0=wrinkles absent (minimum), 1=shallow but visible wrinkles, 2=fine lines slight indentation, 3=clear indentation 0-1mm deep, 4=moderate indentation 1-2mm deep, 5=deep indentation \>2mm deep (maximum). A higher value = a worse outcome (more severe wrinkles). Includes 9 subscales measured on the same scale described above. Subscales measure wrinkle severity in the left and right forehead region, left and right cheek region, left and right crow's feet region, left and right upper lip region, and glabellar region. All scores were computed by averaging subscale ratings.

    Baseline and 4 weeks

  • Blinded Assessment: Overall Change in Facial Wrinkles From Baseline to Week 16 as Assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale Based on Pre- and Post-treatment Photographs

    Blinded assessments of overall change in facial wrinkles from baseline to week 16 based on pre and post treatment photographs. Measured on a 5 point scale which is a static assessment of wrinkle severity. 0=wrinkles absent (minimum), 1=shallow but visible wrinkles, 2=fine lines slight indentation, 3=clear indentation 0-1mm deep, 4=moderate indentation 1-2mm deep, 5=deep indentation \>2mm deep (maximum). A higher value = a worse outcome (more severe wrinkles). Includes 9 subscales measured on the same scale described above. Subscales measure wrinkle severity in the left and right forehead region, left and right cheek region, left and right crow's feet region, left and right upper lip region, and glabellar region. All scores were computed by averaging subscale ratings.

    Baseline and 16 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Treatment Arm A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The first treatment group received onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) on the right side of their face and abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) on the left side of their face. Baseline treatment at Week 0 included the intradermal injection of onabotulinumtoxinA on one side of the face and abobotulinumtoxinA on the other. Patients were treated at Week 2 with traditional intramuscular injections consisting of onabotulinumtoxinA on the same side of their face as at Week 0 and abobotulinumtoxinA on the other side. Patients were treated based on individual need, and thus the treatment volumes were not controlled or standardized.

Drug: onabotulinumtoxinADrug: abobotulinumtoxinA

Treatment Arm B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The second treatment group received abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) on the right side of their face and onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) on the left side of their face. Baseline treatment at Week 0 included the intradermal injection of onabotulinumtoxinA on one side of the face and abobotulinumtoxinA on the other. Patients were treated at Week 2 with traditional intramuscular injections consisting of onabotulinumtoxinA on the same side of their face as at Week 0 and abobotulinumtoxinA on the other side. Patients were treated based on individual need, and thus the treatment volumes were not controlled or standardized.

Drug: onabotulinumtoxinADrug: abobotulinumtoxinA

Interventions

OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox; Allergan) was approved by the FDA in 2002. Intervention administered by study nurse. Intradermal administered in a regular 1 cm2 grid across the cheeks and forehead. Intramuscular administered as per normal practice.

Also known as: Botox
Treatment Arm ATreatment Arm B

AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport; Galderma) was approved by the FDA in 2009. Intervention administered by study nurse. Intradermal administered in a regular 1 cm2 grid across the cheeks and forehead. Intramuscular administered as per normal practice.

Also known as: Dysport
Treatment Arm ATreatment Arm B

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female subjects between ages of 35 to 65 years (inclusive) who exhibit static wrinkles in the following areas: glabella (forehead frowns), periorbital area (crows feet). Static wrinkles in additional areas of the face are also acceptable.
  • Subject is willing to maintain the same skin care regimen throughout the study and has already maintained this skin care regime for 4 weeks prior to baseline.
  • The subject is able to comply with study procedures and instructions and is committed to attend all study visits within the given timelines.
  • Subject is judged to be a good candidate by study nurse upon identification of dynamic and/or static wrinkles in the areas of movement, and with a moderate amount of skin laxity.
  • Subject is willing to use contraception
  • A signed informed consent form by a subject able to give consent, prior to any study procedures are performed.

You may not qualify if:

  • Sensitivity and/or contraindications to botulinum toxin A other ingredients contained in the botulinum toxin A products.
  • Any medical condition, in the opinion of the investigator, that would interfere with safety or any study procedures (e.g. auto-immune disease, history of severe allergies, hypertrophic scars, immunotherapeutic treatment, inflammatory or infectious complaints at injection sites, unable to give consent)
  • Treatment with botulinum toxin A injections in the neck or face within 1 year of baseline treatment
  • Treatment with facial fillers less than 1 year prior to baseline
  • Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant, breastfeeding or plan to get pregnant during the course of the study.
  • Previous treatment with Lasers, Ultrasound Technology or Radio Frequency on the face and/or neck within 1 year prior to baseline.
  • Treatment with Accutane (isotretinoin) or other oral medications for acne during 1 year prior to baseline.
  • The use of anti-aging products containing retinol
  • Known allergy to cow's milk protein

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Sapra P, Demay S, Sapra S, Khanna J, Mraud K, Bonadonna J. A Single-blind, Split-face, Randomized, Pilot Study Comparing the Effects of Intradermal and Intramuscular Injection of Two Commercially Available Botulinum Toxin A Formulas to Reduce Signs of Facial Aging. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2017 Feb;10(2):34-44. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Botulinum Toxins, Type AabobotulinumtoxinA

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Botulinum ToxinsMetalloendopeptidasesEndopeptidasesPeptide HydrolasesHydrolasesEnzymesEnzymes and CoenzymesMetalloproteasesBacterial ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsBacterial ToxinsToxins, BiologicalBiological Factors

Limitations and Caveats

Limitations include small sample size and not having objective assessments. Insignificant p value could mean no difference detected or the sample was too small to detect difference. Blinded assessor made subjective assessments based on the photos.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Shantel Demay
Organization
ICLS

Study Officials

  • Sheetal Sapra, MD, FRCPC

    ICLS Dermatology & Plastic Surgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Dermatology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2016

First Posted

September 20, 2016

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion

January 1, 2014

Study Completion

January 1, 2014

Last Updated

October 13, 2017

Results First Posted

October 13, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Photographs of individual participants are included in presentations and publications. Consent to reproduce photographs has been obtained from all participants. No other IPD is planned to be shared unless requested.