Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for Women With PrOlongedPregnancies
Propess® Versus Double Balloon for Cervical Ripening of Prolonged Pregnancies: a Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
1,224
1 country
14
Brief Summary
A pregnancy is considered ''prolonged'' from 41 weeks of gestation. Prolonged Pregnancies (PP) are associated with increased maternal morbidity: emergency caesarean, 3rd and 4th degree perineal lesions and postpartum haemorrhage. Foetuses are at increased risk of oligohydramnios, meconium-staining and Fetal Heart Rate (FHR) anomalies. Around 15% of all pregnancies are prolonged. A Cochrane review on induction of labour showed that a policy of labour induction at or beyond 41 weeks was associated with significantly fewer perinatal deaths. Thus the French College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists stated, "induction of labour can be proposed to patients between 41+0 and 41+6 weeks of gestation". In cases where labour is induced and cervix is unfavourable, cervical ripening is advised. Methods of cervical ripening include pharmacological (prostaglandins) and mechanical (Foley catheter or trans-cervical double balloon) methods. Those two methods were compared in the PROBAAT trial among women with term pregnancies (beyond 37+0). The rates of caesarean section with these two strategies were identical, however uterine hyper stimulation with FHR anomalies occurred less when cervical ripening was mechanical. Considering pharmacological cervical ripening is associated with more uterine hyper stimulation and more FHR anomalies, it may not be the most appropriate in cases of fragile foetuses that include cases of prolonged pregnancies. Considering prolonged pregnancies are associated with a risk of FHR anomalies and that cervical ripening with a pharmacological method is another factor which increases this risk: women with prolonged pregnancies could benefit from a more "gentle" cervical ripening. At present, no particular method is recommended in cases of cervical ripening and prolonged pregnancies. We hypothesise that, in cases of prolonged pregnancies, mechanical cervical ripening, with less uterine hyperstimulation and fewer FHR anomalies, could be more appropriate and could reduce the rate of caesarean section for suspicion of fetal distress.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jan 2017
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 27, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 12, 2018
CompletedDecember 22, 2025
December 1, 2025
1.9 years
September 6, 2016
December 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Caesarean section rate for non-reassuring fetal status.
Indication of the caesarean section will be settled by an adjudication committee at the end of the study
Up to 2 days after cervical ripening
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Time between cervical ripening and delivery in hours
Up to 2 days after cervical ripening
Delivery rate after 12 and 24 hours of cervical ripening
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
Induction with oxytocin
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
Total dose of oxytocin required for induction of labour
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
Uterine hyper stimulation defined as more than 6 contractions by 10 minutes over a 30 minutes period
up to 2 days after cervical ripening
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Mechanical cervical ripening
EXPERIMENTALmechanical cervical ripening with a Cook® Cervical Ripening Balloon
Pharmacological cervical ripening
ACTIVE COMPARATORpharmacological cervical ripening with a 10mg slow releasing system of Dinoprostone (Propess®)
Interventions
The mechanical cervical ripening is a double transcervical balloon. The device used in the study is the Cook® Cervical Ripening Balloon with CE marked (commercialized by the Cook® laboratory, ref JCRBS-184000). It is a silicone double balloon catheter. Maximum balloon inflation is 80 mL/balloon. It will be used in accordance with user manual
The comparative pharmacological procedure is a vaginal slow releasing system of dinoprostone. The form used in the study is Propess (Ferring pharmaceuticals) containing 10mg of dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2). It will be used in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant women
- ≥ 18 years old
- With a singleton cephalic pregnancy between ≥41+0 weeks and ≤ 42+0 weeks of gestation
- Gestational age estimated from the first trimester ultrasound (realized between 11 and 13+6 weeks of gestation)
- With a decision of induction of labour
- Written informed consent obtained from subject
- Subject covered by or having the rights to the French Social Security system
You may not qualify if:
- Bishop score ≥ 6 (favourable cervix)
- Non cephalic presentation (breech, transverse)
- Severe preeclampsia defined as the presence of preeclampsia with at least one of the following items :
- Severe maternal hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mm Hg)
- Renal failure with oliguria (\< 500 ml/24h) or creatinine \> 135μmol/L, or proteinuria \> 5 g/day
- Pulmonary oedema, epigastric pain or HELLP syndrom (hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme, low platelets)
- Eclampsia or neurologic persisting symptoms (visual disturbances, headache, increased reflexes)
- Thrombopenia \< 100 G/L
- Prior caesarean section or uterine scar
- Placenta praevia
- Suspected genital herpes infection
- Known VIH seropositivity (confirmed by blood serology)
- Premature rupture of membranes (PROM - continual leaking of amniotic fluid or positive test in favour of PROM)
- Foetus with suspected severe congenital abnormalities
- Pathological fetal heart rate
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
Chu Brest
Brest, France
CHU CAEN
Caen, 14033, France
Ch Pontoise
Cergy-Pontoise, 95303, France
Ch Chartres
Chartres, France
Chu Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63001, France
Ch Departemental Vendee
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925, France
Hopital Saint Joseph
Marseille, 13008, France
Chu Nantes
Nantes, 44093, France
Chi Poissy
Poissy, France
Chu Reims
Reims, 51092, France
Chu Rennes
Rennes, France
Chu Saint Etienne
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270, France
Chu Toulouse
Toulouse, France
Chru Tours
Tours, 37044, France
Related Publications (3)
Diguisto C, Le Gouge A, Arthuis C, Winer N, Parant O, Poncelet C, Chauleur C, Hannigsberg J, Ducarme G, Gallot D, Gabriel R, Desbriere R, Beucher G, Faraguet C, Isly H, Rozenberg P, Giraudeau B, Perrotin F; Groupe de Recherche en Obstetrique et Gynecologie (GROG). Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2021 Feb 11;18(2):e1003448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003448. eCollection 2021 Feb.
PMID: 33571294RESULTde Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.
PMID: 36996264DERIVEDDiguisto C, Le Gouge A, Giraudeau B, Perrotin F. Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for women with PrOlongedPregnancies (MAGPOP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a silicone double balloon catheter versus the Propess system for the slow release of dinoprostone for cervical ripening of prolonged pregnancies. BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 14;7(9):e016069. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016069.
PMID: 28912192DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2016
First Posted
September 20, 2016
Study Start
January 27, 2017
Primary Completion
December 12, 2018
Study Completion
December 12, 2018
Last Updated
December 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12