GSK2982772 Study in Subjects With Ulcerative Colitis
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind (Sponsor Unblinded), Placebo-controlled Study With Open Label Extension to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of GSK2982772 in Subjects With Active Ulcerative Colitis
2 other identifiers
interventional
36
7 countries
23
Brief Summary
This study is the first experience with GSK2982772, a receptor-interacting protein-1 (RIP1) kinase inhibitor, in subjects with active ulcerative colitis (UC). The primary objective will be to investigate the safety and tolerability of repeat oral doses of GSK2982772 60 mg or placebo three times daily for 42 days (Part A) followed by open label with GSK298772 60 mg three times daily for 42 days (Part B). In addition to pharmacokinetics (PK), a number of experimental and clinical endpoints will be employed to obtain information on the pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy in subjects with active UC. Although no formal hypothesis will be tested, these endpoints will enable a broader understanding of the mechanism of action and potential for clinical efficacy of GSK2982772 in UC. Within 30 Days of screening visit, subjects will be randomized to receive either GSK2982772 60 mg or placebo orally three times daily for 42 Days (6 weeks) in a 2:1 ratio in Part A study. Subjects who complete the Part A study will move to open label Part B study to receive GSK2982772 60 mg three times daily for an additional 42 Days (6 weeks). After the open label (Part B) treatment period, subjects will enter the Follow-up period which lasts for 28 Days (+/- 3 Days) post the last administration of study medication. The total duration of participation in the study will be approximately 20 Weeks from screening to the last study visit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Nov 2016
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 17, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 17, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 11, 2020
CompletedJune 11, 2020
April 1, 2020
2.6 years
September 13, 2016
May 22, 2020
May 22, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Part A: Number of Participants With Common (>=5%) Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Any Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events; is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function.
Up to Day 43
Part B: Number of Participants With Common (>=5%) Non Serious AEs and SAEs
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; other important medical events; is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function.
From Day 44 to Day 112
Part A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Abnormal Clinical Chemistry Parameters by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria
Clinical chemistry parameters with PCI ranges: aspartate amino transferase (AST), alanine amino transferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (high: \>=2 times upper limit of normal \[ULN\] units per liter \[U/L\]); calcium (low: \<2 millimoles per liter \[mmol/L\] and high: \>2.75 mmol/L); glucose (low: \<3 and high: \>9 mmol/L); potassium (low: \<3 and high: \>5.5 mmol/L); sodium (low: \<130 and high: \>150 mmol/L); total bilirubin (high: \>=1.5 times ULN micromoles per liter \[µmol/L\]); high density lipoproteins (HDL) 0.9 to 99.99 mmol/L; low density lipoprotein (LDL) 0 to 3.35 mmol/L; triglycerides 0 to 2.24 mmol/L, creatinine (high: change from Baseline \[BL\]\>44.2 µmol/L). Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changed to (low, within range or no change, or high) unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the 'To within Range or No Change'
Up to Day 43
Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Abnormal Clinical Chemistry Parameters by Potential Clinical Importance (PCI) Criteria
Clinical chemistry parameters with their PCI ranges were: AST, ALT, and ALP (high: \>=2 ULN \[U/L\]); calcium (low: \<2 mmol/L and high: \>2.75 mmol/L); glucose (low: \<3 and high: \>9 mmol/L); potassium (low: \<3 and high: \>5.5 mmol/L); sodium (low: \<130 and high: \>150 mmol/L); total bilirubin (high: \>=1.5 times ULN \[µmol/L\]); HDL 0.9 to 99.99 mmol/L; LDL 0.to 3.35 mmol/L; triglycerides 0 to 2.24 mmol/L, creatinine (high: change from BL \>44.2 µmol/L). Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changed to (low, within range or no change, or high) unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the 'To within Range or No Change' category.
From Day 44 to Day 112
Part A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Abnormal Hematology Parameters by PCI Criteria
Hematology parameters with their PCI ranges were: hematocrit (high: \>0.54 proportion of red blood cells in blood and low: change from BL\<0.075); hemoglobin (high: \>180 grams per liter \[g/L\] and low: change from BL\<25 g/L); lymphocytes (low: \<0.8 Giga cells/L); platelet count (low: \<100 Giga cells/L and high: \>550 Giga cells/L); neutrophil count (low: \<1.5 Giga cells/L); white blood cell (WBC) count (low: \<3 Giga cells/L and high: \>20 Giga cells/L). Participants were counted in the worst-case category that their value changed to (low, within range or no change, or high) unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the 'To within Range or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had both values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High'.
Up to Day 43
Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Abnormal Hematology Parameters by PCI Criteria
Hematology parameters with their PCI ranges were: hematocrit (high: \>0.54 proportion of red blood cells in blood and low: change from BL\<0.075); hemoglobin (high: \>180 g/L and low: change from BL\<25 g/L); lymphocytes (low: \<0.8 Giga cells/L); platelet count (low: \<100 Giga cells/L and high: \>550 Giga cells/L); neutrophil count (low: \<1.5 Giga cells/L); WBC count (low: \<3 Giga cells/L and high: \>20 Giga cells/L). Participants were counted in the worst-case category that their value changed to (low, within range or no change, or high) unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the 'To within Range or No Change' category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had both values that changed 'To Low' and 'To High'.
From Day 44 to Day 112
Part A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Abnormal Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Method
Urine samples were collected for the assessment of following urine parameters by dipstick method: glucose, protein, blood and ketones. The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner, and results for urinalysis parameters of urine glucose, protein, blood and ketones can be read as negative (-), trace, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, 5+ indicating proportional concentrations in the urine sample. Number of participants with abnormal results were reported as 'increase to trace' or 'increase to 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, 5+' relative to BL (Day 1) value. Participants whose value was unchanged (e.g., Trace to Trace), or whose value was decreased, were recorded in the 'No change or Decreased' category.
Up to Day 43
Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Abnormal Urinalysis Results by Dipstick Method
Urine samples were collected for the assessment of following urine parameters by dipstick method: glucose, protein, blood and ketones. The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner, and results for urinalysis parameters of urine glucose, protein, blood and ketones can be read as negative (-), trace, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, 5+ indicating proportional concentrations in the urine sample. Number of participants with abnormal results were reported as 'increase to trace' or 'increase to 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, 5+' relative to BL (Day 1) value. Participants whose value was unchanged (e.g., Trace to Trace), or whose value was decreased, were recorded in the 'No change or Decreased' category.
From Day 44 to Day 112
Part A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Abnormal Blood Pressure Results by PCI Criteria
Vital signs were measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The clinical concern range for vital signs were: systolic blood pressure (SBP) (low: \<85 and high: \>160 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]); diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (low: \<45 and high: \>100 mmHg). Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changed to (low, within range or no change, or high) unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the 'To within Range or No Change' category.
Up to Day 43
Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Abnormal Blood Pressure Results by PCI Criteria
Vital signs were measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest and included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The clinical concern range for vital signs were: SBP (low: \<85 and high: \>160 mmHg); DBP (low: \<45 and high: \>100 mmHg). Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changed to (low, within range or no change, or high) unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the 'To within Range or No Change' category.
From Day 44 to Day 112
Part A: Number of Participants With Worst Case Abnormal Heart Rate (HR) Results by PCI Criteria
Vital signs were measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest which included HR. The clinical concern range for HR (low \<40 beats per min \[bpm\] and high \>100 bpm). Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changed to (low, within range or no change, or high) unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the 'To within Range or No Change' category.
Up to Day 43
Part B: Number of Participants With Worst Case Abnormal HR Results by PCI Criteria
Vital signs were measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes rest which included HR. The clinical concern range for HR (low \<40 bpm and high \>100 bpm). Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changed to (low, within range or no change, or high) unless there was no change in their category. Participants whose value category was unchanged (e.g., High to High), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the 'To within Range or No Change' category.
From Day 44 to Day 112
Part A: Number of Participants With Worst-case Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
12-lead ECGs were recorded with the participants in a supine position using an ECG machine. Number of participants with worst-case clinically significant and not clinically significant abnormal ECG findings have been presented. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.
Up to Day 43
Part B: Number of Participants With Worst-case Abnormal ECG Findings
12-lead ECGs were recorded with the participants in a supine position using an ECG machine. Number of participants with worst-case clinically significant and not clinically significant abnormal ECG findings have been presented. Clinically significant abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.
From Day 44 to Day 112
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Part A: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Absolute Mayo Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Day 43
Day 43
Part B: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Absolute Mayo Endoscopy Subscore of 0 or 1 at Day 85
Day 85
Part A: Change From Baseline in Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) Total Score
Baseline (screening - within 30 days prior to Day 1) and Day 43
Part B: Change From Baseline in Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) Total Score
Baseline (screening - within 30 days prior to Day 1) and Day 85
Part A: Change From Baseline in Mean C Reactive Protein (CRP)
Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Days 15, 29, 43
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
GSK2982772 in Part A double-blind phase
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will receive GSK2982772 60 mg orally three times daily (approximately 8 hours apart) for 42 days (6 weeks).
Placebo in Part A double-blind phase
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects will receive placebo orally three times daily (approximately 8 hours apart) for 42 days (6 weeks).
GSK2982772 in Part B open label extension phase
EXPERIMENTALSubjects from GSK2982772 and placebo arm who complete Part A study will move to Part B open-label extension phase. All subjects will receive GSK2982772 60 mg three times daily (approximately 8 hours apart) for 42 days (6 weeks).
Interventions
GSK2982772 is available as a 30 mg white to almost white, round film coated tablet which will be administered as two tablets three times a day as directed.
Placebo is available as a white to almost white, round film coated tablet which will be administered as two tablets three times a day as directed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Between 18 and 75 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Subjects that do not have any medical conditions, other than active UC, that in the opinion of the Investigator put the subject at unacceptable risk or interfere with study assessments or integrity of the data. These medical conditions should be stable at the time of screening and are expected to remain stable for the duration of the study.
- Subject has had a confirmed diagnosis of active UC, as documented by complete diagnostic colonoscopy to the terminal ileum (TI) with biopsy performed \>=3 months prior to screening. If diagnostic colonoscopy was not performed to the TI, it must be documented by the principal investigator that the subject has diffuse inflammation from the rectum extending proximally to the colon in a continuous and uniform way.
- A Complete Mayo Score of \>=3 points and endoscopy sub score of 2 to 3 at screening, despite concurrent treatment with at least 1 of the following (oral corticosteroids or any oral 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) or purine analogues or all as defined): Oral 5-ASA at a stable dose (equivalent to \>=2.4 grams per day (g/day) of Asacol) for at least 4 weeks prior to first dose. Must remain on a stable dose until end of treatment; Purine analogues (azathioprine, mercaptopurine, thiopurines) or methotrexate for at least 12 weeks prior to first dose. Must remain on a stable dose until end of treatment; Stable low dose oral corticosteroid (up to 20 mg prednisolone or equivalent) for 2 weeks prior to sigmoidoscopy. Must remain on a stable dose until end of treatment.
- If on rectal 5-ASA or corticosteroids, must remain on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to first dose. Must remain on stable dose until the end of treatment.
- A body mass index (BMI) within range of 18.5 to 35 kilogram per meter square (kg/m\^2) (inclusive) at screening.
- Male and Female subjects:
- Males: Male subjects with female partners of child bearing potential must comply with the contraception requirements.
- Females: A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant (as confirmed by a negative serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) test), not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies:
- Non-reproductive potential defined as 1) Pre-menopausal females with one of the following: Documented tubal ligation; Documented hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow-up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion; Hysterectomy; Documented Bilateral Oophorectomy. 2) Postmenopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea in questionable cases a blood sample with simultaneous follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol levels consistent with menopause. Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the highly effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrolment.
- Reproductive potential and agrees to follow one of the options listed in the Modified List of Highly Effective Methods for Avoiding Pregnancy in Females of Reproductive Potential (FRP) from 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication and until at least 2 days after the last dose of study medication and completion of the follow-up visit. The Investigator is responsible for ensuring that subjects understand how to properly use methods of contraception.
- Capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form and protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject with diagnosis of indeterminate colitis, Crohn's Disease, infectious colitis, or ischemic colitis.
- Subject with fulminant UC, or UC limited to the rectum (disease extent \<15 centimeters (cm) from the anal verge).
- Subject with previous small bowel or colonic surgery(with exception of appendectomy), histological evidence of colonic dysplasia or bowel stricture.
- Subject with colostomy, fistulae or known symptomatic stenosis of the intestine.
- Subject with toxic megacolon.
- Subject with positive Clostridium difficile toxin test or active/previous colonic cytomegalo virus (CMV) infection.
- Subject with current history of suicidal ideation behavior (SIB) as measures using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) or history of attempted suicide.
- An active infection, or a history of infections as follows:
- Hospitalization for treatment of infection within 60 days before first dose (Day 1).
- Currently on any suppressive therapy for a chronic infection (such as pneumocystis, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, herpes zoster and atypical mycobacteria).
- Use of parenteral (intravenous (IV) or intramuscular) antibiotics (antibacterials, antivirals, antifungals, or antiparasitic agents) for an infection within 60 days before first dose.
- A history of opportunistic infections within 1 year of screening (example: pneumocystis jirovecii, CMV pnemonitis, aspergillosis). This does not include infections that may occur in immunocompetent individuals, such as fungal nail infections or vaginal candidiasis, unless it is of an unusual severity or recurrent nature.
- Recurrent or chronic infection or other active infection that, in the opinion of the Investigator might cause this study to be detrimental to the patient.
- History of tuberculosis (TB), irrespective of treatment status. A positive diagnostic TB test at screening defined as a positive QuantiFERON-TB Gold test or T-spot test. In cases where the QuantiFERON or T-spot test is indeterminate, the subject may have the test repeated once, but they will not be eligible for the study unless the second test is negative. In cases where the QuantiFERON or T-spot test is positive, but a follow-up chest x-ray, locally read by a radiologist, shows no evidence of current or previous pulmonary tuberculosis, the subject may be eligible for the study at the discretion of the Investigator and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Medical Monitor.
- QTc \>450 millisecond (msec) or QTc \>480 msec for subjects with bundle branch block at screening.
- +18 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (23)
GSK Investigational Site
Moreno Valley, California, 92555, United States
GSK Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92115, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Marrero, Louisiana, 70072, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Great Neck, New York, 11021, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Cedar Park, Texas, 78613, United States
GSK Investigational Site
Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, 89081, Germany
GSK Investigational Site
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
GSK Investigational Site
Katowice, 40-660, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Ksawerów, 95-054, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Wroclaw, Poland
GSK Investigational Site
Kaliningrad, 236022, Russia
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 123098, Russia
GSK Investigational Site
Rostov-on-Don, 344091, Russia
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Pertersburg, 196247, Russia
GSK Investigational Site
Stavropol, 355018, Russia
GSK Investigational Site
Ufa, 450071, Russia
GSK Investigational Site
Stockholm, SE-171 76, Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Stockholm, SE-182 88, Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Uppsala, SE-752 37, Sweden
GSK Investigational Site
Stockport, Cheshire, SK2 7JE, United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Belfast, BT16 1RH, United Kingdom
GSK Investigational Site
Dudley, DY1 2HQ, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Weisel K, Scott N, Berger S, Wang S, Brown K, Powell M, Broer M, Watts C, Tompson DJ, Burriss SW, Hawkins S, Abbott-Banner K, Tak PP. A randomised, placebo-controlled study of RIPK1 inhibitor GSK2982772 in patients with active ulcerative colitis. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug;8(1):e000680. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000680.
PMID: 34389633DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2016
First Posted
September 16, 2016
Study Start
November 15, 2016
Primary Completion
June 17, 2019
Study Completion
June 17, 2019
Last Updated
June 11, 2020
Results First Posted
June 11, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04