Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture in Elderly in Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of Volar-flexion, Ulnar-deviation and Functional Position Cast Immobilization in the Non-operative Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture in Elderly Patients: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
114
1 country
3
Brief Summary
There is no consensus about the best conservative treatment for patients with dorsally displaced distal radius fractures. The previous studies that have examined the most valid method for cast immobilization have lacked uniform and patient-rated outcome measures, proper randomization and sufficient study population. The aim of this study is to compare functional position cast to flexion-ulnar -deviation with dorsally displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years or older. The conservative treatment is performed in clinical practice by various health care professionals with different techniques of reduction which are not limited to any specific technique in this pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2018
CompletedMay 22, 2018
May 1, 2018
1.8 years
August 22, 2016
May 18, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) measure is the primary outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in the study
The PRWE comprises 15 questions to measure wrist pain and disability in daily activities. In PRWE patients rate wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10 and it consists three subscales: Pain, Function and Cosmetics.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Disability of the wrist measured with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire.
2 years
Quality of life measured with the 15-D.
2 years
Pain measured in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years
Range of motion (ROM) is measured with a goniometer
3 months
Grip strength is measured with a dynamometer
3 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1
OTHERConservative treatment chosen by physician on-call for dorsally displaced radius fracture.
Arm 2
OTHERConservative treatment chosen by physician on-call for dorsally displaced radius fracture.
Interventions
The group will be treated with closed reduction and flexion-ulnar deviation position cast. This will take place under local anaesthesia by means of local infiltration commonly used in Finland. There is no preferable method for performing the reduction. Additional radiographs will be taken to verify the success of the reduction one week after the reduction and after two and five weeks of casting if treating health care professional it requires. The cast will be disposed after 5 weeks.
The group will be treated with closed reduction and functional position cast. This will take place under local anaesthesia by means of local infiltration commonly used in Finland. There is no preferable method for performing the reduction. Additional radiographs will be taken to verify the success of the reduction one week after the reduction and after two and five weeks of casting if treating health care professional it requires. The cast will be disposed after 5 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Low energy intra- or extra-articular dorsal primarily stable, reducible DRF within 3 cm of the radiocarpal joint diagnosed with lateral and posterior-anterior radiographs in ER
- Physician on-call (general practitioner, acute physician, orthopedic resident, orthopedic consult) thinks patient could be appropriate for non-operative treatment
You may not qualify if:
- Operative treatment
- Refuse to participate the study
- Open fracture more than Gustilo 1 gradus
- Age under 65 years
- Chauffeure's or Barton´s fracture
- Smith´s fracture (volar angulation of the fracture)
- Does not understand written and spoken guidance in local languages
- Pathological fracture or previous fracture in the same wrist, forearm or elbow
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tampere University Hospitallead
- Central Finland Hospital Districtcollaborator
- Satakunta Central Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Central Finland Central Hospital
Jyväskylä, Finland
Satakunta Central Hospital
Pori, Finland
Tampere Univeristy Hospital
Tampere, Finland
Related Publications (3)
Ax M, Reito A, Hevonkorpi TP, Palola V, Kukkonen J, Luokkala T, Laitinen MK, Launonen AP, Mattila VM. A comparison of the functional results and costs of functional cast and volar-flexion ulnar deviation cast at 2-year follow-up in 105 patients aged 65 and older with dorsally displaced distal radius fracture: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0283946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283946. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37023069DERIVEDRaittio L, Launonen AP, Hevonkorpi T, Luokkala T, Kukkonen J, Reito A, Laitinen MK, Mattila VM. Two casting methods compared in patients with Colles' fracture: A pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0232153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232153. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32469881DERIVEDRaittio L, Launonen A, Hevonkorpi T, Luokkala T, Kukkonen J, Reito A, Sumrein B, Laitinen M, Mattila VM. Comparison of volar-flexion, ulnar-deviation and functional position cast immobilization in the non-operative treatment of distal radius fracture in elderly patients: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 18;18(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1759-y.
PMID: 28923035DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ville Mattila, MD, Professor
Tampere Univeristy Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Antti Launonen, MD, PhD
Tampere University Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Teemu Hevonkorpi, MBBS
Tampere University Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Lauri Raittio, MBBS
Tampere University Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Toni Luokkala, MD
Central Finland Central Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Aleksi Reito, MD, PhD
Central Finland Central Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Juha Kukkonen, MD, PhD
Satakunta Central Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Minna Laitinen, Adjacent prof
Tampere University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MBBS
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2016
First Posted
September 9, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2018
Study Completion
May 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 22, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05