Proprioceptive Deficits and Anomalies in Movement-error Processing in Chronic Stroke Patients
2 other identifiers
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Clinical assessment of motor and sensory deficits is still today largely based on tests that do not permit any precise quantification. However, robotic technologies, coupled with neuroimaging techniques constitute new tools to assess sensorimotor functions that could allow to conceive neurorehabilitation protocols better adapted to the neurological impairment of each patient and to her/his specific recovery profile. The goal of this project is to contribute identifying the factors that determine functional recovery in stroke patients presenting upper-limb motor deficits. Here, we will focus our research on two factors that contribute in a complementary way to motor control: 1) the processing of proprioceptive informations, and 2) the processing of movement-execution errors. In this purpose, we will combine psychophysical methods that allow to precisely quantify sensorimotor deficits with functional and anatomical neuroimaging techniques. More specifically, we will exploit experimental protocols that have been developed in basic research, that use a robotic exoskeleton coupled with a virtual reality device, to precisely quantify motor and proprioceptive deficits in stroke patients. Then, we will link these behavioral data to electroencephalographic (EEG) signals recorded during a motor adaptation task, as well as to anatomical data, namely conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) completed by diffusion tensor images (DTI) in order to achieve a finer description of the cerebral lesions. The present study will include two experimental parts, respectively centered on the proprioceptive deficits (Part 1) and the anomalies in the processing of movement-execution errors (Part 2). Proprioceptive deficits in stroke patients : We will test the hypothesis that, when present, deficits in kinaesthesia and troubles in unconscious proprioception contribute substantially to motor deficits in stroke patients ; with as a corollary hypothesis, that deficits in " proprioception for action " are more determinant than deficits in the conscious sense of position (classically tested in clinics). In this purpose, we will collect three sets of behavioral data, in chronic stroke patients and healthy control participants, respectively intended to assess a) motor deficits, b) troubles in conscious sense of position, and c) deficits in "proprioception for action". To better document the neuronatomical substrates of these different types of deficits. In this purpose, we will link the obtained behavioral data with the results of detailed analyses of the lesions of the tested stroke patients. Anomalies in the processing of movement-execution errors in stroke patients : We will assess movement-execution error processing in stroke patients, in order to test the idea that anomalies in error processing might contribute to motor deficits in stroke patients. In this purpose, we will record an electrophysiological correlate (ERP) of movement-error processing during a motor adaptation task. We will analyse the relation between the modulation of this ERP and motor performance. We will also examine the relation between these two sets of data (behavioral and electrophysiological) and the behavioral data collected during the first part of the study (Proprioceptive deficits). This will provide us with insight into the relationship between proprioceptive deficits and cinematic error processing. As in the first part of the study, we will link the observed electrophysiological and behavioral anomalies with the results of a detailed analysis of the anatomical lesions of the tested patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedAugust 29, 2016
August 1, 2016
2.4 years
August 24, 2016
August 24, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numbers of anomalies in the processing of movement-execution
4hours
Study Arms (2)
Pateint with chronic stroke
EXPERIMENTALHealthy volunteer
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Stroke patients with ischaemia of the upper limb for less than 6 months
- Patients with sensorimotor deficits
You may not qualify if:
- Patients treated with botulinum toxin for less than 6 months
- Alcoholic patients
- Patients who had surgery on upper limb
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
Marseille, 13354, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Urielle Desalbres
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laurent Bensoussan, MD/PhD
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2016
First Posted
August 29, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 29, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share