Pre-procedural Mouthwash in Reducing Bacteria in Dental Aerosols
Effectiveness of a Pre-procedural Mouthwash in Reducing Bacteria in Dental Aerosols and Splatters: a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized, single blinded clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of a pre-procedural mouthwash containing cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), zinc lactate (Zn) and sodium fluoride (F) in the reduction of viable bacteria in oral aerosol/splatter after a dental prophylaxis with ultrasonic scaler.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Feb 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2016
CompletedJune 4, 2020
June 1, 2020
28 days
August 18, 2016
June 2, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference between groups (test, positive control, negative control A and negative control B) for the mean number of total colony-forming units (CFUs) in all plates.
During oral prophylaxis procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Number of total CFUs in plates positioned on the clinician forehead.
During oral prophylaxis procedure.
Number of total CFUs in plates positioned on the volunteer's chest.
During oral prophylaxis procedure.
Number of total CFUs in plates positioned on the support board.
During oral prophylaxis procedure.
Proportion of the microbial complexes.
During oral prophylaxis procedure.
Reduction in CFUs in the CPC+Zn+F and CHX groups in comparison with the two negative control groups.
During oral prophylaxis procedure.
Study Arms (4)
Test: Mouthwash CPC+Zn+F
EXPERIMENTALTo rinse with pre-procedural mouthwash containing 0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride, 0.28% zinc lactate and 0.05% sodium fluoride in an Alcohol-free base (for one minute and 20 ml of solution) + full mouth dental prophylaxis using ultrasonic scaler.
Positive control: Mouthwash CHX
ACTIVE COMPARATORTo rinse with pre-procedural mouthwash containing 0.12% CHX with 10% alcohol (for one minute and 20 ml of solution) + full mouth dental prophylaxis using ultrasonic scaler.
Negative control A: No rinsing
PLACEBO COMPARATORNo rinsing with pre-procedural mouthwash + full mouth dental prophylaxis using ultrasonic scaler.
Negative control B: Water
PLACEBO COMPARATORTo rinse with pre-procedural mouthwash containing water from a three-way syringe (for one minute and 20 ml of solution) + full mouth dental prophylaxis using ultrasonic scaler.
Interventions
Full mouth dental prophylaxis (FMDP) was conducted in one appointment lasting 10 minute, using an ultrasonic scaler at a frequency of 25 kHz (Cavitron Select SPC, Dentsply professional, York, PA, USA) at less than 50% power. The FMDP performed without anesthesia and in order to eliminate supragingival plaque, calculus and stainings.
The volunteer rinsed with pre-procedural mouthwash containing 0.075% cetylpyridinium chloride, 0.28% zinc lactate and 0.05% sodium fluoride in an Alcohol-free base for one minute, 20 ml of solution and then expectorated all remaining liquid.
The volunteer rinsed with pre-procedural mouthwash containing 0.12% CHX with 10% alcohol for one minute, 20 ml of solution and then expectorated all remaining liquid.
The volunteer did not rinse with any pre-procedural mothwash.
The volunteer rinsed with pre-procedural mouthwash containing water from a three-way syringe for one minute, 20 ml of water and then expectorated all remaining liquid.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged between 18-70 years;
- minimum of 20 natural teeth (excluding third molars and teeth with advanced decay indicated for extraction);
- at least 80% of the sites with visible supragingival plaque;
- fewer than 10% of sites with visible supragingival calculus;
- fewer than 30% of sites with probing depth (PD) ≥ 5 mm.
You may not qualify if:
- presence of orthodontic bands;
- partial removable dentures;
- lesions of the soft or hard tissues of the oral cavity;
- carious lesions requiring immediate restorative treatment;
- history of allergy to CHX, CPC, zinc lactate or sodium fluoride;
- participation in any other clinical study within the one-month period prior to entering into the study;
- professional tooth cleaning procedure (oral prophylaxis) during the period of one month prior to entering the study;
- pregnant or breast-feeding women;
- antibiotic therapy in the previous 6 months;
- continuous use of oral mouthwashes;
- any systemic condition that may require prophylactic medication for dental treatment (e.g., mitral valve prolapse).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (34)
Bentley CD, Burkhart NW, Crawford JJ. Evaluating spatter and aerosol contamination during dental procedures. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994 May;125(5):579-84. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0093.
PMID: 8195499BACKGROUNDCochran MA, Miller CH, Sheldrake MA. The efficacy of the rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms during dental treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989 Jul;119(1):141-4. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1989.0131.
PMID: 2760346BACKGROUNDErovic Ademovski S, Lingstrom P, Renvert S. The effect of different mouth rinse products on intra-oral halitosis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2016 May;14(2):117-23. doi: 10.1111/idh.12148. Epub 2015 May 31.
PMID: 26031397BACKGROUNDGrenier D. Quantitative analysis of bacterial aerosols in two different dental clinic environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Aug;61(8):3165-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.8.3165-3168.1995.
PMID: 7487047BACKGROUNDGupta G, Mitra D, Ashok KP, Gupta A, Soni S, Ahmed S, Arya A. Efficacy of preprocedural mouth rinsing in reducing aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scaler: a pilot study. J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):562-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120616. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
PMID: 23855840BACKGROUNDHarrel SK, Molinari J. Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: a brief review of the literature and infection control implications. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Apr;135(4):429-37. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0207.
PMID: 15127864BACKGROUNDJones CG. Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard? Periodontol 2000. 1997 Oct;15:55-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00105.x.
PMID: 9643233BACKGROUNDKanjirath PP, Coplen AE, Chapman JC, Peters MC, Inglehart MR. Effectiveness of gloves and infection control in dentistry: student and provider perspectives. J Dent Educ. 2009 May;73(5):571-80.
PMID: 19433532BACKGROUNDKeni NN, Aras MA, Chitre V. Chlorhexidine allergy due to topical application. Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;23(5):674-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.107393.
PMID: 23422617BACKGROUNDKjaerheim V, Skaare A, Barkvoll P, Rolla G. Antiplaque, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory properties of triclosan mouthrinses in combination with zinc citrate or polyvinylmethylether maleic acid (PVM-MA) copolymer. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996 Oct-Dec;104(5-6):529-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00137.x.
PMID: 9021321BACKGROUNDLang C, Murgia C, Leong M, Tan LW, Perozzi G, Knight D, Ruffin R, Zalewski P. Anti-inflammatory effects of zinc and alterations in zinc transporter mRNA in mouse models of allergic inflammation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007 Feb;292(2):L577-84. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00280.2006. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
PMID: 17085522BACKGROUNDLeggat PA, Kedjarune U. Bacterial aerosols in the dental clinic: a review. Int Dent J. 2001 Feb;51(1):39-44. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-595x.2001.tb00816.x.
PMID: 11326448BACKGROUNDLegnani P, Checchi L, Pelliccioni GA, D'Achille C. Atmospheric contamination during dental procedures. Quintessence Int. 1994 Jun;25(6):435-9.
PMID: 7938434BACKGROUNDMendes L, Coimbra J, Pereira AL, Resende M, Pinto MG. Comparative effect of a new mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine, triclosan and zinc on volatile sulphur compounds: a randomized, crossover, double-blind study. Int J Dent Hyg. 2016 Aug;14(3):202-8. doi: 10.1111/idh.12132. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
PMID: 25727335BACKGROUNDNejatidanesh F, Khosravi Z, Goroohi H, Badrian H, Savabi O. Risk of Contamination of Different Areas of Dentist's Face During Dental Practices. Int J Prev Med. 2013 May;4(5):611-5.
PMID: 23930175BACKGROUNDPandit S, Cai JN, Jung JE, Lee YS, Jeon JG. Effect of brief cetylpyridinium chloride treatments during early and mature cariogenic biofilm formation. Oral Dis. 2015 Jul;21(5):565-71. doi: 10.1111/odi.12312. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
PMID: 25600577BACKGROUNDRivera-Hidalgo F, Barnes JB, Harrel SK. Aerosol and splatter production by focused spray and standard ultrasonic inserts. J Periodontol. 1999 May;70(5):473-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.5.473.
PMID: 10368050BACKGROUNDSlots J. Low-cost periodontal therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2012 Oct;60(1):110-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00429.x.
PMID: 22909110BACKGROUNDSocransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent RL Jr. Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Feb;25(2):134-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02419.x.
PMID: 9495612BACKGROUNDSouza-Gugelmin MC, Lima CD, Lima SN, Mian H, Ito IY. Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines. Braz Dent J. 2003;14(1):55-7. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402003000100010. Epub 2003 Jul 31.
PMID: 12656466BACKGROUNDThomas E. Efficacy of two commonly available mouth rinses used as preprocedural rinses in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Apr-Jun;29(2):113-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.84682.
PMID: 21911948BACKGROUNDTimmerman MF, Menso L, Steinfort J, van Winkelhoff AJ, van der Weijden GA. Atmospheric contamination during ultrasonic scaling. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Jun;31(6):458-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00511.x.
PMID: 15142216BACKGROUNDToroglu MS, Haytac MC, Koksal F. Evaluation of aerosol contamination during debonding procedures. Angle Orthod. 2001 Aug;71(4):299-306. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)0712.0.CO;2.
PMID: 11510639BACKGROUNDVaroni E, Tarce M, Lodi G, Carrassi A. Chlorhexidine (CHX) in dentistry: state of the art. Minerva Stomatol. 2012 Sep;61(9):399-419. English, Italian.
PMID: 22976567BACKGROUNDVeena HR, Mahantesha S, Joseph PA, Patil SR, Patil SH. Dissemination of aerosol and splatter during ultrasonic scaling: a pilot study. J Infect Public Health. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2014.11.004. Epub 2015 Jan 3.
PMID: 25564419BACKGROUNDYengopal V. The use of essential oil mouthwashes as preprocedural rinses for infection control. SADJ. 2004 Jul;59(6):247-8, 250. No abstract available.
PMID: 15457911BACKGROUNDCosta X, Laguna E, Herrera D, Serrano J, Alonso B, Sanz M. Efficacy of a new mouth rinse formulation based on 0.07% cetylpyridinium chloride in the control of plaque and gingivitis: a 6-month randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Nov;40(11):1007-15. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12158. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
PMID: 24024983RESULTFeres M, Figueiredo LC, Faveri M, Stewart B, de Vizio W. The effectiveness of a preprocedural mouthrinse containing cetylpyridinium chloride in reducing bacteria in the dental office. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Apr;141(4):415-22. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0193.
PMID: 20354090RESULTGiertsen E. Effects of mouthrinses with triclosan, zinc ions, copolymer, and sodium lauryl sulphate combined with fluoride on acid formation by dental plaque in vivo. Caries Res. 2004 Sep-Oct;38(5):430-5. doi: 10.1159/000079623.
PMID: 15316186RESULTKang JH, Jang YJ, Kim DJ, Park JW. Antimicrobial effectiveness of cetylpyridinium chloride and zinc chloride-containing mouthrinses on bacteria of halitosis and peri-implant disease. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):1341-7. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3824. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
PMID: 26478974RESULTKaur R, Singh I, Vandana KL, Desai R. Effect of chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, and ozone on microorganisms in dental aerosols: randomized double-blind clinical trial. Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Mar-Apr;25(2):160-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.135910.
PMID: 24992844RESULTLogothetis DD, Martinez-Welles JM. Reducing bacterial aerosol contamination with a chlorhexidine gluconate pre-rinse. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995 Dec;126(12):1634-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0111.
PMID: 7499664RESULTReddy S, Prasad MG, Kaul S, Satish K, Kakarala S, Bhowmik N. Efficacy of 0.2% tempered chlorhexidine as a pre-procedural mouth rinse: A clinical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Apr;16(2):213-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.99264.
PMID: 23055587RESULTShetty SK, Sharath K, Shenoy S, Sreekumar C, Shetty RN, Biju T. Compare the effcacy of two commercially available mouthrinses in reducing viable bacterial count in dental aerosol produced during ultrasonic scaling when used as a preprocedural rinse. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Sep 1;14(5):848-51. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1414.
PMID: 24685786RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Magda Feres, Professor
Guarulhos University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- DDS, MSc, PhD Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2016
First Posted
August 23, 2016
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
September 2016