Clinical, Anti-Inflammatory And Anti-Infective Properties Of Amniotic Membranes Used For Guided Tissue Regeneration
Evaluation of Clinical, Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Infective Properties of Amniotic Membranes Used For Guided Tissue Regeneration in Contained Defects
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the anti-inflammatory and anti-infective properties of amniotic membrane (AM) when used for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in periodontal bone defects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Mar 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 8, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2014
CompletedDecember 22, 2015
December 1, 2015
11 months
January 8, 2014
December 21, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The mean difference in levels of hBD-2/IL-1β
Commercially available ELISA kits were used to quantify GCF levels of hBD-2 and IL-1β. All assay procedures were conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions and in the test, 100μl of the samples or standards were added into the respective wells in duplicate. Color development was stopped using 1% H2SO4 and absorbance of the entire plate was measured within 30 minutes by an ELISA reader at 450nm. The amounts of hBD-2 and IL-1β were calculated based on the dilutions, and the results were expressed in picograms in the 30-second GCF sample.
From Baseline to One month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Bone fill assessment
Baseline to 6 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Measures of periodontitis and gingivitis
Baseline to 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Amniotic Membrane
EXPERIMENTALThe test site was treated as follows; After placement and proper condensation of natural Hydroxyapatite graft in the defect, AM was cut based on defect anatomy of surgical site and then adapted over the bone graft and alveolar bone extending from base of the flap reflection to the tooth surface.
Control group (Hydroxyapatite only)
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe control site was treated by graft placement (Hydroxyapatite) only
Interventions
AM strongly resembles the oral mucosal basement membrane and possesses several types of laminins, which can promote regeneration, accelerate tissue adhesion, and preserve tissues, all of which play a key role in improved healing of periodontal lesions and might result in reduction in probing pocket depth (PPD) and decrease in clinical attachment loss (CAL)
The placebo group was treated with Hydroxyapatite graft placement only.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Systemically healthy chronic periodontitis patients within the age group of 30-55 years having at least 2 periodontal pockets ≥5 mm with at least 1 pocket in each quadrant showing radiographic evidence of vertical bone loss were included in the study. Assessment of suitability for GTR membrane placement was confirmed by transgingival probing to verify the presence of two well-contained interdental bone defects in as many quadrants.
You may not qualify if:
- Smokers, medically compromised patients, pregnant women \& lactating mothers and subjects receiving periodontal therapy in the 24 weeks (6-month)-period leading to the study were not included.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SVS Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 509002, India
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Anumala Naveen, MDS
SVS Institute of Dental Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary Investigator and Director of Records
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 8, 2014
First Posted
January 10, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2013
Last Updated
December 22, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12