Study Stopped
Principal Investigator let the institution prior to study initiation.
Beacon BNX™ Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Needle vs SharkCore™ Needle
Prospective Randomized Study of Utilizing the 22-gauge Standard FNA Needle Compared to the SharkCore™ 22-gauge Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) Needle in Patients With Solid Mass Lesions of the Gastrointestinal Tract
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this proposed prospective randomized, multi-center study is to evaluate the capability of the new 22G SharkCore™ needle to obtain tissue specimens and to compare its performance against the standard 22G BNX Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine needle aspiration (Beacon Endoscopic, Newton, MA) needle in the evaluation of solid mass lesions in the pancreas and gastrointestinal tract. The secondary objective is to determine the ability of the 22G SharkCore™ needle system to yield histologic tissue.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jul 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedApril 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
1 year
July 25, 2016
April 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic Accuracy of the 22G SharkCore™ and the 22G BNX EUS-FNA needle
The primary endpoint measures of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the 22G SharkCore™ needle system or the 22G BNX EUS-FNA needle for the diagnosis malignancy in solid lesions of the pancreas and gastrointestinal tract. Diagnostic accuracy of the EUS needles for the diagnosis of malignancy is calculated as the number of True Positives with malignancy +True Negatives with malignancy/True Positives with malignancy +True Negatives with malignancy +False Positives with malignancy +False Negatives with malignancy.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Sensitivity of the EUS Needles
12 months
Complications of the EUS Needles
12 months
Diagnostic sufficiency of Tissue obtained by the EUS Needles
12 months
Specificity of the 22G SharkCore™ needle and the 22G BNX EUS-FNA Needle for the diagnosis malignancy in solid lesions of the pancreas and gastrointestinal tract.
12 months
Study Arms (2)
22G SharkCore™ needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORCovidien has recently released a novel SharkCore™ Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) system for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid gastrointestinal lesions. With its unique bevel design, this needle has shown promising results to acquire histologic tissue as per oral communication with physicians around the country
22G BNX EUS-FNA needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe standard 22G BNX Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine needle aspiration (Beacon Endoscopic, Newton, MA) needle is routinely used for the evaluation of solid mass lesions in the pancreas and gastrointestinal tract.
Interventions
The 2 dedicated passes from the SharkCore™ needle will be placed in a jar with formaldehyde-based fixative and sent for routine histopathology evaluation. The cassette will be processed, embedded in paraffin, and then prepared in hematoxylin and eosin to be evaluated by one pathologist, who was blinded to the randomization sequence, for the presence of a histologic tissue. If adequate histologic tissue is present, the specimen will be graded as optimal or suboptimal.
Aspirates will be placed onto glass slides and preserved with Diff-Quik stain (American Scientific Products, McGraw Park, Illinois, USA). In addition, a smear will also be placed in alcohol for Papanicolaou staining. Any additional material was sprayed into Hanks's solution and sent for cell block processing. The cytology technician or cytopathologist on site will verify adequacy of specimens. At least two passes will be obtained from the lesion unless the technician established the presence of malignant appearing cells.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible patients will include anyone \>18 years old that presents to the participating clinical institutions and requires an endosonographic evaluation for the presence of a solid-appearing mass lesion amenable to EUS access, and no contraindication to FNA as determined by standard clinical care
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate in the study
- Solid-appearing mass lesion that in not amenable to EUS guided needle access for tissue acquisition
- Patients with incomplete medical records
- Pregnant patients
- Prisoners
- INR \> 1.5
- Platelets \< 50,000
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ali Siddiqui, MD
Thomas Jefferson University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2016
First Posted
August 19, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share