Comparison of Back-loaded vs Preloaded Fiducial Needles in EUS-guided Fiducial Marker Placement in Pancreatic Cancer.
Comparison of Traditional Back-loaded Fiducial Needles With Preloaded Fiducial Needles in EUS-guided Fiducial Marker Placement for Image-guided Radiation Therapy in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has been pivotal in accomplishing image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in patients with pancreatic cancer by allowing precise contouring and identification of target lesions in the pancreas via placement of fiducials using fine needle aspiration (FNA) needles. Currently, back-loading the fiducials is the only option for preparing delivery of fiducials via the EUS approach. A prototype 22-Gauge EUS needle preloaded with four fiducials has recently been developed, and used in a porcine models with successful results. There are no randomized controlled trials comparing total duration of time needed for placement of fiducials using technical success of the traditional back- loading technique of fiducial markers to the new preloaded needles in regards to EUS based fiducial marker placement for IGRT in pancreatic cancer. Hypotheses Use of a 22 G preloaded needle for EUS guided fiducial marker placement in patients with pancreatic cancer will:
- 1.Be delivered in at least require 60% less of the procedure time that it takes for traditional back-loaded 22G needles
- 2.Improve overall procedure efficiency
- 3.Maintain comparable technical success and adverse event rates.
- 4.To compare adverse event rates in 22G needle placement of Visicoil fiducial markers and 22G needle preloaded fiducial markers
- 5.To compare endpoints of technical success defined as proper placement of two to three fiducial markers in a pancreatic neoplasm in 22G needle placement of Visicoil fiducial markers and 22G needle preloaded fiducial markers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer
Started Aug 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 22, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 3, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 9, 2020
CompletedDecember 9, 2020
December 1, 2020
1.7 years
September 22, 2014
May 11, 2020
December 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Procedure Duration Required for Placing the Fiducial Markers
Duration of procedure for placing fiducial markers including: Fiducial package was opened start time (start stop watch) + Fiducial placement end time (end stop watch) = Placing Fiducial Markers Time
During scheduled procedure (approximately 1 hour)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Total Procedure Time
During scheduled procedure (approximately 1 hour)
Number of Participants With Technical Success EUS Needle Visualization
During scheduled procedure (approximately 1 hour)
Technical Success
During scheduled procedure (approximately 1 hour)
Number of Participants With Visualization of Fiducials as Assessed by Radiation Oncology
Several hours to 7 days after fiducial marker deployment
Number of Participants With Inadvertent Deployment of Fiducials
During scheduled procedure (approximately 1 hour)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Back-loaded needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients will undergo Linear EUS and have fiducial marker placement via a traditional 22G back-loaded needle. CRFs will be used to record data for primary and secondary endpoints.
Preloaded Needle
EXPERIMENTALThe patients will undergo Linear EUS and have fiducial marker placement via a traditional 22G preloaded needle. CRFs will be used to record data for primary and secondary endpoints.
Interventions
Fiducial marker placement via a traditional 22G back-loaded needle will be performed with multiple endpoints recorded: * total length of procedure * how many markers are successfully deployed * technical success Fiducial marker location will be confirmed via fluoroscopy at time of placement and on 4D treatment planning CT ordered by the radiation oncologist for simulation.
Fiducial marker placement via a novel 22G preloaded needle will be performed with multiple endpoints recorded: * total length of procedure * how many markers are successfully deployed * technical success Fiducial marker location will be confirmed via fluoroscopy at time of placement and on 4D treatment planning CT ordered by the radiation oncologist for simulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with pathologically confirmed pancreatic cancer referred for image guided radiation therapy (IGRT)
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18
- Inability to consent
- Known coagulopathy/thrombocytopenia (INR \>1.5, platelets \<75)
- Patients on antiplatelet/anticoagulant medication that cannot safely be discontinued 5-7 days prior to the procedure
- Gold allergy
- Current infection
- EUS evidence of vessel interfering with path of fiducial marker
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denverlead
- Cook Group Incorporatedcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
Related Publications (19)
Colbert LE, Hall WA, Nickleach D, Switchenko J, Kooby DA, Liu Y, Gillespie T, Lipscomb J, Kauh J, Landry JC. Chemoradiation therapy sequencing for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer. 2014 Feb 15;120(4):499-506. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28530. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
PMID: 24390739BACKGROUNDFuss M, Wong A, Fuller CD, Salter BJ, Fuss C, Thomas CR. Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2007 Jan;1(1):2-11.
PMID: 19262697BACKGROUNDReese AS, Lu W, Regine WF. Utilization of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and image-guided radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer: is it beneficial? Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014 Apr;24(2):132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2013.11.003.
PMID: 24635870BACKGROUNDJaved S, Bhutani MS. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2013 Dec;59(4):377-86.
PMID: 24212355BACKGROUNDKooby DA, Gillespie TW, Liu Y, Byrd-Sellers J, Landry J, Bian J, Lipscomb J. Impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival after pancreatic cancer resection: an appraisal of data from the national cancer data base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3634-42. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3047-x. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
PMID: 23771249BACKGROUNDSuzuki R, Irisawa A, Bhutani MS. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided oncologic therapy for pancreatic cancer. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2013;2013:157581. doi: 10.1155/2013/157581. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
PMID: 23533319BACKGROUNDKhashab MA, Kim KJ, Tryggestad EJ, Wild AT, Roland T, Singh VK, Lennon AM, Shin EJ, Ziegler MA, Sharaiha RZ, Canto MI, Herman JM. Comparative analysis of traditional and coiled fiducials implanted during EUS for pancreatic cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Nov;76(5):962-71. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.07.006.
PMID: 23078921BACKGROUNDAmmar T, Cote GA, Creach KM, Kohlmeier C, Parikh PJ, Azar RR. Fiducial placement for stereotactic radiation by using EUS: feasibility when using a marker compatible with a standard 22-gauge needle. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):630-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.023.
PMID: 20189527BACKGROUNDPark WG, Yan BM, Schellenberg D, Kim J, Chang DT, Koong A, Patalano C, Van Dam J. EUS-guided gold fiducial insertion for image-guided radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer: 50 successful cases without fluoroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):513-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.030.
PMID: 20189509BACKGROUNDDavila Fajardo R, Lekkerkerker SJ, van der Horst A, Lens E, Bergman JJ, Fockens P, Bel A, van Hooft JE. EUS-guided fiducial markers placement with a 22-gauge needle for image-guided radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 May;79(5):851-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.12.027. Epub 2014 Feb 8. No abstract available.
PMID: 24518121BACKGROUNDDiMaio CJ, Nagula S, Goodman KA, Ho AY, Markowitz AJ, Schattner MA, Gerdes H. EUS-guided fiducial placement for image-guided radiation therapy in GI malignancies by using a 22-gauge needle (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1204-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.003.
PMID: 20598247BACKGROUNDOwens DJ, Savides TJ. EUS placement of metal fiducials by using a backloaded technique with bone wax seal. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Apr;69(4):972-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.052. Epub 2009 Jan 18. No abstract available.
PMID: 19152903BACKGROUNDKhara HS, Pineda-Bonilla JJ, Chaput KJ, Johal AS. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided placement of fiducial markers using a novel "wet-fill technique" without a bone wax seal. Endoscopy. 2013;45 Suppl 2 UCTN:E426-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358809. Epub 2013 Dec 13. No abstract available.
PMID: 24338173BACKGROUNDPishvaian AC, Collins B, Gagnon G, Ahlawat S, Haddad NG. EUS-guided fiducial placement for CyberKnife radiotherapy of mediastinal and abdominal malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Sep;64(3):412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.01.048.
PMID: 16923491BACKGROUNDVaradarajulu S, Trevino JM, Shen S, Jacob R. The use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gold markers in image-guided radiation therapy of pancreatic cancers: a case series. Endoscopy. 2010 May;42(5):423-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243989. Epub 2010 Mar 15.
PMID: 20232282BACKGROUNDSanders MK, Moser AJ, Khalid A, Fasanella KE, Zeh HJ, Burton S, McGrath K. EUS-guided fiducial placement for stereotactic body radiotherapy in locally advanced and recurrent pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.12.020. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
PMID: 20362284BACKGROUNDDraganov PV, Chavalitdhamrong D, Wagh MS. Evaluation of a new endoscopic ultrasound-guided multi-fiducial delivery system: a prospective non-survival study in a live porcine model. Dig Endosc. 2013 Nov;25(6):615-21. doi: 10.1111/den.12046. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
PMID: 23489989BACKGROUNDFuccio L, Guido A, Larghi A, Antonini F, Lami G, Fabbri C. The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the radiation treatment of pancreatic tumor. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Sep;8(7):793-802. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2014.913479. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
PMID: 24766230BACKGROUNDMachicado JD, Obuch JC, Goodman KA, Schefter TE, Frakes J, Hoffe S, Latifi K, Simon VC, Santangelo T, Ezekwe E, Edmundowicz SA, Brauer BC, Shah RJ, Hammad HT, Wagh MS, Attwell A, Han S, Klapman J, Wani S. Endoscopic Ultrasound Placement of Preloaded Fiducial Markers Shortens Procedure Time Compared to Back-Loaded Markers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec;17(13):2749-2758.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.046. Epub 2019 Apr 28.
PMID: 31042578DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Sachin Wani
- Organization
- University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sachin Wani, MD
University of Colorado, Denver
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2014
First Posted
January 7, 2015
Study Start
August 3, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2018
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
December 9, 2020
Results First Posted
December 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12