Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
593
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Appendectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in emergency surgery. Because of lack of consensus about the most appropriate technique, appendectomy is still being performed by both open (OA) and laparoscopic (LA) methods. In this retrospective analysis, the investigators aimed to compare the laparoscopic approach and the conventional technique in the treatment of acute appendicitis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jan 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2016
CompletedAugust 16, 2016
August 1, 2016
7.5 years
August 8, 2016
August 13, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Hospital cost
Mean hospital cost (in Euro) for patients that underwent appendectomy
3 days
Wound infection
Number of patients with wound infection after appendectomy
1 week
Study Arms (2)
Open appendectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects that underwent open surgery for appendicitis
Laparoscopic appendectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects that underwent laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- acute appendicitis
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women and patients with severe medical disease (hemodynamic instability, chronic medical or psychiatric illness, cirrhosis, coagulation disorders) requiring intensive care
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Biondi A, Di Stefano C, Ferrara F, Bellia A, Vacante M, Piazza L. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study assessing outcomes and cost-effectiveness. World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Aug 30;11(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0102-5. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27582784DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2016
First Posted
August 15, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2004
Primary Completion
July 1, 2011
Study Completion
July 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 16, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08