The Pelvic Floor Muscles Strength and Sexual Function in Primigravid and Non-pregnant Nulliparous
Is There Relationship Between the Pelvic Floor Muscles Strength and Sexual Function in Primigravid and Non-pregnant Nulliparous?
1 other identifier
observational
154
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study has two aims: a) to evaluate the pelvic floor muscles strength in primigravid and non-pregnant nulliparous women and to correlate with their sexual function and b) to compare PFM strength and sexual function between women in the second and third pregnancy trimesters.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Nov 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2016
CompletedAugust 15, 2016
August 1, 2016
1.7 years
August 4, 2016
August 12, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
muscle strength with Oxford scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year
score of Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (2)
non-pregnant nulliparous
Nulliparous without previous gestation. Pelvic floor muscle evaluation by means of vaginal palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure (perineometer), and evaluation of the sexual function by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire.
primigravid
Pregnant women on her first pregnancy and gestational age above 14 weeks. Pelvic floor muscle evaluation by means of vaginal palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure (perineometer), and evaluation of the sexual function by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire.
Interventions
PFM evaluation was performed by vaginal palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. During vaginal palpation the physiotherapist introduced the index and middle fingers about 4cm inside the vagina, and requested to hold the maximum contraction of the PFM. Muscle function was classified by the Oxford Scale Modified. The vaginal squeeze pressure was measured through Perineometer.To obtain the measurements, the subjects remained positioning and vaginal sensor was introduced into the vaginal cavity. The women were oriented and motivated verbally to perform three voluntary maximal contractions sustained for five seconds and one minute interval between them. Sexual function was evaluated by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 19 multiple-choice questions, which involves six sexual response domains: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain.
Eligibility Criteria
The sample consisted of 154 women divided into two groups: the first of pregnant women, formed by 76 primigravidae participants in the Prenatal Program of the public health system in Uberlandia city (Brazil). The second consists of 78 non-pregnant nulliparous.
You may qualify if:
- Be non-pregnant nulliparous or primigravid women with pregnant only one fetus alive and without abnormalities that could increase uterine volume
- Present ability to contract the pelvic floor muscles
- Report at least one sexual relationship in the four weeks prior to data collection
You may not qualify if:
- Were previous urogynecological surgery history
- Non-pregnant nulliparous who did not have sexual intercourse with vaginal penetration
- Presence of cognitive impairment or neurological condition that could affect muscle activation
- Present urinary tract infection at the time of data collection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Marília Duarte dos Santos
Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, 38405024, Brazil
Related Publications (3)
Pereira VS, Hirakawa HS, Oliveira AB, Driusso P. Relationship among vaginal palpation, vaginal squeeze pressure, electromyographic and ultrasonographic variables of female pelvic floor muscles. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014 Sep-Oct;18(5):428-34. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0038. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
PMID: 25372005BACKGROUNDBo K, Finckenhagen HB. Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Oct;80(10):883-7. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.801003.x.
PMID: 11580731RESULTArab AM, Behbahani RB, Lorestani L, Azari A. Correlation of digital palpation and transabdominal ultrasound for assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):e75-9. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.75E.
PMID: 20046616RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2016
First Posted
August 15, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 15, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08