VivaSight-SL™ Versus Bronchoscopy for Percutaneous Tracheotomy
VivaPDT
Prospective, Randomized Study in Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Receiving Percutaneous Tracheotomy. A Comparison of Periinterventional Visualization of Conventional Bronchoscopy and an Endotracheal Tube Mounted Camera (VivaSight-SL™)
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Optical guidance for percutaneous tracheotomy in intensive care is usually performed by bronchoscopy. Recently, an endotracheal tube with a camera mounted at its tip (VivaSight-SL) has been introduced that allows for endotracheal visualization. For feasibility evaluation, ten patients in intensive care receive percutaneous tracheotomy with optical guidance by the VivaSight-SL tube. If this part is completed with satisfactory results, patients are randomized to receive optical guidance by bronchoscopy or by VivaSight-SL tube. The primary end point is the visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score, see detailed description).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 13, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 13, 2017
CompletedMarch 23, 2017
March 1, 2017
10 months
June 13, 2016
March 22, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score)
during tracheotomy
Secondary Outcomes (9)
minute ventilation according to score generated from 4 point Likert scale at 2 time points
two time points: 1. during identification of landmark structures before puncture of trachea, 2. during puncture, dilatation and tracheotomy
pulse oxymetric oxygen saturation according to score generated from 4 point Likert scale at 2 time points
two time points: 1. during identification of landmark structures before puncture of trachea, 2. during puncture, dilatation and tracheotomy
change in pH-values
three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
change in paCO2 values
three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
change in etCO2 values
three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
bronchoscopic guidance
ACTIVE COMPARATORoptical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional bronchoscopy
tube mounted camera guidance
EXPERIMENTALoptical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by the VivaSight-SL tube
Interventions
optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional bronchoscopy
optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by the VivaSight-SL tube
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients receiving percutaneous tracheotomy in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years
- No consent
- Direct laryngoscopy according to Cormack-Lehane ≥ 3
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Related Publications (9)
Dreher M, Kluge S. [Airway devices in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2014 Jun;68(6):371-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365318. Epub 2014 Mar 25. German.
PMID: 24668495BACKGROUNDCiaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest. 1985 Jun;87(6):715-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.87.6.715.
PMID: 3996056BACKGROUNDBraune S, Kluge S. [Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Jun;136(23):1265-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280549. Epub 2011 May 31. No abstract available. German.
PMID: 21630175BACKGROUNDVargas M, Sutherasan Y, Antonelli M, Brunetti I, Corcione A, Laffey JG, Putensen C, Servillo G, Pelosi P. Tracheostomy procedures in the intensive care unit: an international survey. Crit Care. 2015 Aug 13;19(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1013-7.
PMID: 26271742BACKGROUNDHuitink JM, Koopman EM, Bouwman RA, Craenen A, Verwoert M, Krage R, Visser IE, Erwteman M, van Groeningen D, Tijink R, Schauer A. Tracheal intubation with a camera embedded in the tube tip (Vivasight() ). Anaesthesia. 2013 Jan;68(1):74-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.12065. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
PMID: 23121322BACKGROUNDLinstedt U, Zenz M, Krull K, Hager D, Prengel AW. Laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a comparison of visibility of intratracheal structures. Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110(4):1076-82. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d27fb4.
PMID: 20357150BACKGROUNDBaumann HJ, Kemei C, Kluge S. [Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2010 Dec;64(12):769-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255743. Epub 2010 Sep 20. German.
PMID: 20857374BACKGROUNDByhahn C, Wilke HJ, Halbig S, Lischke V, Westphal K. Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):882-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00021.
PMID: 11004042BACKGROUNDGrensemann J, Eichler L, Kahler S, Jarczak D, Simon M, Pinnschmidt HO, Kluge S. Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT). Crit Care. 2017 Dec 29;21(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1901-0.
PMID: 29284503DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stefan Kluge, MD, PhD
Head of Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2016
First Posted
August 10, 2016
Study Start
April 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 13, 2017
Study Completion
January 13, 2017
Last Updated
March 23, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share