"TRAcheostomy With Single Use Bronchoscopes vs. Conventional Bronchoscopes"
TraSUB
Prospective, Randomized Study in Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Receiving Percutaneous Tracheotomy. A Comparison of Periinterventional Visualization of Conventional Bronchoscopy and Single Use Bronchoscopy (TraSUB™)
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Optical guidance for percutaneous tracheostomy in intensive care is usually performed by conventional multi use bronchoscopy. Recently a single use bronchoscope has been introduced that allows for endotracheal visualization. For feasibility evaluation, 23 patients in intensive care receive percutaneous tracheostomy with optical guidance by the Ambu® aScopeTM 4 bronchoscope and 23 patients in intensive care receive percutaneous tracheostomy with a conventional bronchoscope (Olympus BF Type P60). The primary end point is the visualization through the single use bronchoscope of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheostomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score, see detailed description).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 4, 2019
CompletedNovember 19, 2019
November 1, 2019
6 months
April 28, 2019
November 16, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visualisation
visualisation through the single use bronchoscope of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score) Scale Name: Rating A) Identification of: thyroid cartilage, cricoid cartilage, 1st-3rd tracheal cartilage 1 Reliable identification; 2 Only cricoid cartilage and tracheal cartilages; 3 Only tracheal cartilages; 4 No vision on tracheal structures B) Visualization of tracheal circumference 1 Complete; 2 circumference 1/3 to 2/3 of circumference; 3 Only small parts of trachea; 4 No vision on tracheal structures C) Monitoring puncture: midline + level below 1st or 2nd tracheal cartilage 1 Reliable identification; 2 Midline sure Level uncertain, but below the 1st tracheal cartilage; 3 Level of puncture uncertain; 4 No vision on tracheal structures D) Monitoring dilatation Anterior wall and Pars membranacea (P.m.) visible; 1 Reliable identification; 2 P.m. only; 3 Only small parts of trachea visible, no control of P.
during tracheotomy
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Minute ventilation
two time points: 1. during identification of landmark structures before puncture of trachea, 2. during puncture, dilatation and tracheotomy
Peak airway pressure
three time points: baseline value (before sterile drapes are applied), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min after insertion of tracheal cannula
pH
three time points: baseline value (before sterile drapes are applied), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min after insertion of tracheal cannula
paO2
three time points: baseline value (before sterile drapes are applied), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min after insertion of tracheal cannula
paCO2
three time points: baseline value (before sterile drapes are applied), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min after insertion of tracheal cannula
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Single Use Bronchoscopy
EXPERIMENTALoptical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by single use bronchoscopy
Conventional Multi Use Bronchoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORoptical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional multi use bronchoscopy
Interventions
optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by single use bronchoscopy
optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional multi use bronchoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients receiving percutaneous tracheotomy in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years
- No consent
- Direct laryngoscopy according to Cormack-Lehane ≥ 3
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Related Publications (9)
Dreher M, Kluge S. [Airway devices in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2014 Jun;68(6):371-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365318. Epub 2014 Mar 25. German.
PMID: 24668495BACKGROUNDCiaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest. 1985 Jun;87(6):715-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.87.6.715.
PMID: 3996056BACKGROUNDBraune S, Kluge S. [Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Jun;136(23):1265-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280549. Epub 2011 May 31. No abstract available. German.
PMID: 21630175BACKGROUNDVargas M, Sutherasan Y, Antonelli M, Brunetti I, Corcione A, Laffey JG, Putensen C, Servillo G, Pelosi P. Tracheostomy procedures in the intensive care unit: an international survey. Crit Care. 2015 Aug 13;19(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1013-7.
PMID: 26271742BACKGROUNDGrensemann J, Eichler L, Kahler S, Jarczak D, Simon M, Pinnschmidt HO, Kluge S. Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT). Crit Care. 2017 Dec 29;21(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1901-0.
PMID: 29284503BACKGROUNDBaumann HJ, Kemei C, Kluge S. [Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2010 Dec;64(12):769-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255743. Epub 2010 Sep 20. German.
PMID: 20857374BACKGROUNDByhahn C, Wilke HJ, Halbig S, Lischke V, Westphal K. Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):882-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00021.
PMID: 11004042BACKGROUNDLinstedt U, Zenz M, Krull K, Hager D, Prengel AW. Laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a comparison of visibility of intratracheal structures. Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110(4):1076-82. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d27fb4.
PMID: 20357150BACKGROUNDTariparast PA, Brockmann A, Hartwig R, Kluge S, Grensemann J. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy with single use bronchoscopes versus reusable bronchoscopes - a prospective randomized trial (TraSUB). BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr 2;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01618-4.
PMID: 35366806DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jörn Grensemann, MD
Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2019
First Posted
May 16, 2019
Study Start
May 15, 2019
Primary Completion
November 1, 2019
Study Completion
November 4, 2019
Last Updated
November 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share