NCT02860013

Brief Summary

There are two main aims in this study. The first objective is to evaluate whether a particular telehealth solution, in addition to standard treatment and care, lead to a significant decrease in the mortality and an increase in health related quality of life for patients suffering from Heart Failure that may benefit from telehealth compared with only standard treatment and care. The second objective is to examine the additional costs of the telehealth solution and assess whether this solution is a cost-effective way to care for patients with Heart Failure across patients and municipality districts. It is hypothesized that telehealth care will increase patients quality adjusted life years compared to usual practice, since no difference in mortality and a higher health related quality of life is expected. Furthermore, it is hoped that there will be a 30% reduction in the number of admissions and readmissions to hospitals and a 30% reduction in the number of outpatient visits resulting in fewer costs for hospitals. However, it is uncertain as to whether these savings are offset by other costs such as more visits to general practitioners, community care or the implementation costs.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
600

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable heart-failure

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 28, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2016

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 9, 2016

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 15, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 28, 2016

Last Update Submit

August 13, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

TelemedicineEffectivenessCost-effectiveness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Mental health related quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire mental scores)

    Changes in mental health-related quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire mental score) at baseline to follow-up.

    12 month follow-up

  • Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)

    The main outcome for cost is incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). ICER is measured as the total cost per quality adjusted life years (QALY) increased from baseline to follow-up.

    12 month follow-up

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in daily functioning (KCCQ questionnaire score)

    12 month follow-up

  • Physical health related quality of life (SF-36 questionnaire Physical scores)

    12 month follow-up

Study Arms (2)

Telemedicine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A tablet (a Samsung GALAXY TAB 2 (10.1)) that holds information on handling heart failure in general. The device can also collect and transmit relevant disease-specific data, which are indicative of their current state of health, via a Digital Blood Pressure Monitor (Model UA-767, plus BT-C) and a scale. The device can measure four vital signs, which are transferred wirelessly: blood pressure, pulse, and weight. The tablet can be activated and give a sound, when it is time for taking measurements again.

Device: Telemedicine

Usual care

NO INTERVENTION

In Denmark, usual practice for treating, monitoring and caring for patients with heart failure are the responsibility of the patient's general practitioner (treatment and monitoring) and the municipalities (practical help and nursing care). Heart failure patients can make appointments with their general practitioner or practice nurse free of charge in order to get help in managing heart failure. Community based care and practical help varies. As a rule community care comes at regular intervals based on a clinically based estimate of the patients' needs, but the personnel are not necessarily certified nurses and often not fully educated in heart failure and definitely not on call

Interventions

Telemedicine

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All heart failure patients that may benefit from telehealthcare.
  • Patients must have a permanent residence and be motivated for using telehealthcare. \*Patients must have a landline or mobile phone and be able to speak Danish or they must live with a relative speaking Danish. Such that the relative must be able to help the patient in translating the information in the use of telehealthcare.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients without landline phone / mobile phone or GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) coverage.
  • Patients not able to understand Danish adequately to complete the questionnaires in the study or patients having a cognitive impairment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aalborg University

Aalborg, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Vestergaard AS, Hansen L, Sorensen SS, Jensen MB, Ehlers LH. Is telehealthcare for heart failure patients cost-effective? An economic evaluation alongside the Danish TeleCare North heart failure trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 27;10(1):e031670. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031670.

  • Cichosz SL, Udsen FW, Hejlesen O. The impact of telehealth care on health-related quality of life of patients with heart failure: Results from the Danish TeleCare North heart failure trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2020 Aug-Sep;26(7-8):452-461. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19832713. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

  • Cichosz SL, Ehlers LH, Hejlesen O. Health effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telehealthcare for heart failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Dec 12;17(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1722-5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2016

First Posted

August 9, 2016

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion

August 1, 2018

Study Completion

August 1, 2018

Last Updated

August 15, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations