Continuous Versus Intermittent Oxytocin for Induction of Labor: A Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates continuous oxytocin versus intermittent oxytocin for induction of labor at term. Half of participants will be taken continuous oxytocin, while the other half will be taken intermittent oxytocin.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Aug 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedDecember 8, 2016
December 1, 2016
4 months
August 4, 2016
December 6, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
induction-to-delivery time
intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
Continuous oxytocin
ACTIVE COMPARATORoxytocin will be used at a starting dose of 1-2 mIU/min and the dose will be increased by 2 mIU/min at every 15 minutes until regular contractions will be obtained at a rate of 3-5 contractions in a 10-minute period. The maximum dose of oxytocin will 40 mIU/min and oxytocin will be administered until delivery.
intermittent oxytocin
EXPERIMENTALoxytocin will be discontinued when cervical dilation will 5 cm and 2 hours after discontinuation oxytocin will be reused at a starting dose of 1-2 mIU/min and will be increased as the same protocol will be used for continuation oxytocin group.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- singleton pregnancy,
- ≤ weeks of gestational age ,
- vertex presentation,
- women with cervical dilation 3 cm
- no contraindication to vaginal delivery.
You may not qualify if:
- fetal malpresentation,
- multifetal pregnancy,
- more than three contractions in 10 minutes,
- contraindications to oxytocin,
- a category II or III fetal heart rate pattern,
- fetal anomaly,
- fetal demise
- women with immediate delivery indications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Children's Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Istanbul, 34000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Bor P, Ledertoug S, Boie S, Knoblauch NO, Stornes I. Continuation versus discontinuation of oxytocin infusion during the active phase of labour: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):129-35. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13589. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
PMID: 26309128BACKGROUNDOzturk FH, Yilmaz SS, Yalvac S, Kandemir O. Effect of oxytocin discontinuation during the active phase of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Jan;28(2):196-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.906573. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
PMID: 24646336BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
evrim bostanci ergen
Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and Training Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- medical doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2016
First Posted
August 9, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 8, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share