Study Stopped
Data from the initial participants were analyzed to support an NIH grant submission, leading to NIH funding of a new protocol to expand on the initial results.
Generate a Pharmacodynamic Model of Oxytocin for Peripheral Analgesic Effects
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a study of participants that will receive an intravenous (IV) infusion of oxytocin (naturally occurring hormone that is made in the brain). In this study healthy volunteers and people with knee arthritis so severe that they may need joint replacement are recruited for a one day study. Each study participant will have an IV catheter placed. After placement of the IV catheter oxytocin will be given by IV infusion. Investigators will perform some tests to evaluate how oxytocin changes perceptions on the skin. Investigators will study a painful perception by placing a probe on the skin and heating it to 113 -117 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for 5 minutes. Each study participant will score any pain that is experienced on a 0 to 10 scale, and most people find that pain rises during the 5 minutes, but remains mild, usually around only 1 or 2 on the 0 to 10 scale. The 5 minute heating temperature will be determined according to the subjects pain rating during the screening visit. The main goal of the study is to determine the effect of oxytocin during and after a fixed rate intravenous infusion on reduction in pain to a sustained heat stimulus in order to generate a model for peripheral analgesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 25, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 29, 2025
CompletedSeptember 11, 2025
January 1, 2025
21 days
June 4, 2020
August 12, 2025
August 29, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
First Verbal Pain Score After Beginning IV Oxytocin Infusion
Pain at the end of 5 minutes of heating the skin to 45 - 47 degrees C will be determined using a Verbal Pain scale 0-10. 0 is equivalent to NO PAIN and 10 is equivalent to THE WORST PAIN IMAGINABLE. Heating temperature is determined by pain rating during screening visit.
2-10 minutes after starting oxytocin infusion, depending on Arm
Second Verbal Pain Score After Beginning IV Oxytocin Infusion
Pain at the end of 5 minutes of heating the skin to 45 - 47 degrees C will be determined using a Verbal Pain scale 0-10. 0 is equivalent to NO PAIN and 10 is equivalent to THE WORST PAIN IMAGINABLE. Heating temperature is determined by pain rating during screening visit.
17-25 minutes after starting oxytocin infusion, depending on Arm
Third Verbal Pain Score After Beginning IV Oxytocin Infusion
Pain at the end of 5 minutes of heating the skin to 45 - 47 degrees C will be determined using a Verbal Pain scale 0-10. 0 is equivalent to NO PAIN and 10 is equivalent to THE WORST PAIN IMAGINABLE. Heating temperature is determined by pain rating during screening visit.
32-40 minutes after starting oxytocin infusion, depending on Arm
Fourth Verbal Pain Score After Beginning IV Oxytocin Infusion
Pain at the end of 5 minutes of heating the skin to 45 - 47 degrees C will be determined using a Verbal Pain scale 0-10. 0 is equivalent to NO PAIN and 10 is equivalent to THE WORST PAIN IMAGINABLE. Heating temperature is determined by pain rating during screening visit.
47-55 minutes after starting oxytocin infusion, depending on Arm
Fifth Verbal Pain Score After Beginning IV Oxytocin Infusion
Pain at the end of 5 minutes of heating the skin to 45 - 47 degrees C will be determined using a Verbal Pain scale 0-10. 0 is equivalent to NO PAIN and 10 is equivalent to THE WORST PAIN IMAGINABLE. Heating temperature is determined by pain rating during screening visit.
62-70 minutes after starting oxytocin infusion, depending on Arm
Study Arms (4)
Verbal pain score at 2 minutes
OTHERVerbal pain score is recorded at the end of 5 minutes of heating the skin. In this arm the first score is obtained at 2 minutes after starting the intervention, then every 15 minutes for 60 minutes
Verbal pain score at 5 minutes
OTHERVerbal pain score is recorded at the end of 5 minutes of heating the skin. In this arm the first score is obtained at 5 minutes after starting the intervention, then every 15 minutes for 60 minutes
Verbal pain score at 7 minutes
OTHERVerbal pain score is recorded at the end of 5 minutes of heating the skin. In this arm the first score is obtained at 7 minutes after starting the intervention, then every 15 minutes for 60 minutes
Verbal pain score at 10 minutes
OTHERVerbal pain score is recorded at the end of 5 minutes of heating the skin. In this arm the first score is obtained at 10 minutes after starting the intervention, then every 15 minutes for 60 minutes
Interventions
Oxytocin, 8.2 IU, administered by 30minute IV infusion starting at time 0
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female \> 18 and \< 75 years of age, Body Mass Index (BMI) \<40.
- Generally in good health as determined by the Principal Investigator based on prior medical history, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1, 2, or 3.
- For healthy volunteers, normal blood pressure (systolic 90-140 mmHg; diastolic 50-90 mmHg) resting heart rate 45-100 beats per minute) without medication. For knee arthritis subjects, normal blood pressure or, for those with hypertension, pressure controlled with anti-hypertensives and with a resting heart rate 45-100 beats per minute.
- Female subjects of child-bearing potential and those \< 1 year post-menopausal, must be practicing highly effective methods of birth control such as hormonal methods (e.g., combined oral, implantable, injectable, or transdermal contraceptives), double barrier methods (e.g., condoms, sponge, diaphragm, or vaginal ring plus spermicidal jellies or cream), or total abstinence from heterosexual intercourse for a minimum of 1 full cycle before study drug administration.
You may not qualify if:
- Hypersensitivity, allergy, or significant reaction to any ingredient of Pitocin®
- Any disease, diagnosis, or condition (medical or surgical) that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, would place the subject at increased risk (active gynecologic disease in which increased tone would be detrimental e.g., uterine fibroids with ongoing bleeding), compromise the subject's compliance with study procedures, or compromise the quality of the data
- Women who are pregnant (positive result for serum pregnancy test at screening visit), women who are currently nursing or lactating, women that have been pregnant within 2 years
- Subjects with neuropathy, chronic pain, diabetes mellitus, or taking benzodiazepines or pain medications on a daily basis.
- Subjects with current or history of ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation or prolonged QT interval.
- Subjects with past or current history of hyponatremia or at risk for hyponatremia; anyone taking thiazide diuretics, loop diuretics, combination diuretics, lithium, carbamazepine, enalapril, Ramipril, celecoxib, temazepam, gliclazide, glimepiride, glibenclamide, glipizide, omeprazole, pantoprazole, desmopressin, SSRI's, MAOI, or the recreational drug ecstasy.
- Subjects with a known latex allergy.
- Subjects with a pain score rating of 1 or less during the initial training session to a 5 minute heating of 45°C- 47 °C to the lower calf.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study was paused after the completion of 7 healthy participants and data were analyzed for the purpose of a grant application revision. The results led to a heavily revised proposed study of pharmacodynamic modeling, and when the grant was funded, this new study was approved and performed under a different IRB approval and CTG registration.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. James Eisenach
- Organization
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James C Eisenach, MD
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2020
First Posted
June 16, 2020
Study Start
November 4, 2020
Primary Completion
November 25, 2020
Study Completion
November 25, 2020
Last Updated
September 11, 2025
Results First Posted
August 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data will be available upon posting results to a preprint server, anticipated to occur by the end of the first quarter of 2026
- Access Criteria
- For the purpose of pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic modeling or meta-analyses / review publications.
De-identified data will be provided upon request.