NCT02637830

Brief Summary

This study mainly compared the response of the artificial carious enamel lesions to remineralisation in situ. The tested in vitro demineralising protocols were: MC gel, PA gel, MHDP and Buffer solutions. The lesions were then remineralised in an in situ model, with crossover and double blind design. Fifteen volunteers wore intra-oral appliances containing 2 bovine enamel samples of each demineralising protocol during 3 experimental phases (3 days each). The experimental phases/treatments were: Control (Placebo dentifrice, saliva effect only), Home-care (fluoride dentifrice, 1,100 ppm F, NaF), and Professional/Home-care (varnish- 22,600 ppm F and dentifrice- 1,100 ppm F, NaF). During the 3-day phase, the appliance was only removed during the main meals (four times a day, maximum 1 h duration each, interval between meals 2-3 h). Immediately after the meals, before replacing the appliance in the mouth, the subjects were advised to perform oral hygiene using a soft end-rounded toothbrush (Colgate® 360º Sensitive Pro-Relief TM) and dentifrice (non-fluoridated from IceFresh, Bauru, SP, Brazil or fluoridated dentifrice from Crest Procter \& Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, USA) according to the phase and dental floss (Sanifill, São Paulo, Brazil). The remineralising treatment with dentifrices was done ex vivo, 1 min twice a day (after the first and last oral hygiene of the day) using slurry of the dentifrice (1:3 water, 1 drop of solution/specimen). Thereafter, the appliance was replaced in the mouth and the subjects were advised to rinse with 10 ml of water for 5 s and to expectorate. In respect to Professional/Home-care phase, the varnish (Duraphat, Colgate, SP, Brazil) was applied before the in situ study for 6h and then removed. The enamel remineralization was quantified using transverse microradiography (% mineral recovery and lesion depth, TMR), surface and cross-sectional hardness. The data were submitted to statistical analysis (p\<0.05).

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2012

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2012

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2012

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 8, 2015

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 22, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

December 24, 2015

Status Verified

December 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

December 8, 2015

Last Update Submit

December 22, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • The increase of mineral content (% mineral volume) using transverse microradiography

    3 days

  • The increase of hardness (KHN or KgF/mm2) artificial caries lesions using surface and cross-sectional hardness

    3 days

  • Decrease of lesion depth (microns) of artificial caries lesions using transverse microradiography

    3 days

Study Arms (3)

Fluoride varnish and fluoride toothpaste

EXPERIMENTAL

Application of fluoride varnish (Duraphat) at the begining of the study. Application of fluoride toothpaste (Crest) twice a day for 3 days.

Other: Application of fluoride varnish (22600 ppm F, Duraphat) at the begining of the studyOther: Application of fluoride toothpaste (1500 ppm F, Crest) twice a day for 3 days of the study

placebo toothpaste

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Application of placebo toothpaste twice a day for 3 days

Other: Application of placebo toothpaste (0 ppm F, Ice Fresh) twice a day for 3 days of the study

Fluoride toothpaste

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Application of fluoride toothpaste (Crest) twice a day for 3 days

Other: Application of fluoride toothpaste (1500 ppm F, Crest) twice a day for 3 days of the study

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • a stimulated physiological salivary flow rate of \>1 ml.min-1
  • a non-stimulated physiological salivary flow rate of \>0.25 ml.min-1
  • good oral health (i.e. no cavities or significant gingivitis/periodontitis)

You may not qualify if:

  • systemic illness
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • use of fixed or removable orthodontic appliances
  • use of fluoride mouthrinse or professional fluoride application in the last 2 months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Interventions

sodium fluoride topical preparation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof. Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2015

First Posted

December 22, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion

June 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

December 24, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-12