Anti-VEGF vs. Prompt Vitrectomy for VH From PDR
AB
Intravitreous Anti-VEGF vs. Prompt Vitrectomy for Vitreous Hemorrhage From Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
4 other identifiers
interventional
205
2 countries
62
Brief Summary
Although vitreous hemorrhage (VH) from proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) can cause acute and dramatic vision loss for patients with diabetes, there is no current, evidence-based clinical guidance as to what treatment method is most likely to provide the best visual outcomes once intervention is desired. Intravitreous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy alone or vitrectomy combined with intraoperative PRP each provide the opportunity to stabilize or regress retinal neovascularization. However, clinical trials are lacking to elucidate the relative time frame of visual recovery or final visual outcome in prompt vitrectomy compared with initial anti-VEGF treatment. The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol N demonstrated short-term trends consistent with a possible beneficial effect of anti-VEGF treatment in eyes with VH from PDR, including greater visual acuity improvement and reduced rates of recurrent VH as compared with saline injection. It is possible that a study with a longer duration of follow-up with structured anti-VEGF retreatment would demonstrate even greater effectiveness of anti-VEGF for VH to avoid vitrectomy and its attendant adverse events while also improving visual acuity. On the other hand, advances in surgical techniques leading to faster operative times, quicker patient recovery, and reduced complication rates may make prompt vitrectomy a more attractive alternative since it results in the immediate ability to clear hemorrhage and to perform PRP if desired, often as part of one procedure. This proposed study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of two treatment approaches for eyes with VH from PDR: prompt vitrectomy + PRP and intravitreous aflibercept injections.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Nov 2016
Typical duration for phase_2
62 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 3, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 19, 2021
CompletedApril 20, 2021
February 1, 2021
3.2 years
August 3, 2016
December 22, 2020
March 24, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score (Area Under the Curve From Baseline)
The area under the curve (units = letters·weeks) was divided by 24 weeks (units = weeks) to obtain an average change in letter score (units = letters) over the 24-weekr follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent of \<20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity.
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (15)
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score
4 Weeks
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score
12 Weeks
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score
24 Weeks
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score
1-Year from participant randomization
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score
2 Years
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intravitreous 2 mg aflibercept injections
ACTIVE COMPARATORInitial injection must be given on the day of randomization. Follow-up injections will be performed as often as every 4 weeks unless criteria for deferral are met.
Prompt vitrectomy plus panretinal photocoagulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor the prompt vitrectomy + panretinal photocoagulation group, the vitrectomy must be scheduled to be performed within 2 weeks of randomization. Vitrectomy will be performed according to the investigator's usual routine, including pre-operative care, surgical procedure, and post-operative care, although anti-VEGF may not be given post-operatively unless there is recurrent hemorrhage.
Interventions
Soluble decoy receptor fusion protein that has a high binding affinity to all isoforms of VEGF as well as to placental growth factor.
Surgical removal of the vitreous gel and associated hemorrhage, concurrent delivery of panretinal endolaser
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \>= 18 years Participants \<18 years old are not being included because proliferative diabetic retinopathy is so rare in this age group that the diagnosis may be questionable.
- Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2)
- Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:
- Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes
- Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes
- Documented diabetes by American Diabetes Association and/or World Health Organization criteria 4. Able and willing to provide informed consent. 5. Patient is willing and able to undergo vitrectomy within next 2 weeks and the vitrectomy can be scheduled within that time frame.
- \. Vitreous hemorrhage causing vision impairment, presumed to be from proliferative diabetic retinopathy, for which intervention is deemed necessary.
- Subhyaloid hemorrhage alone does not make an eye eligible; however, presence of subhyaloid hemorrhage in addition to the criteria above will not preclude participation provided the investigator is comfortable with either treatment regimen.
- \. Immediate vitrectomy not required (investigator and participant are willing to wait at least 4 months to see if hemorrhage clears sufficiently with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor without having to proceed to vitrectomy).
- \. Visual acuity letter score ≤78 (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/32) and at least light perception.
- \. Investigators should use particular caution when considering enrollment of an eye with visual acuity letter score 69 to 78 (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/32 to 20/40) to ensure that the need for vitrectomy and its potential benefits outweigh the potential risks.
You may not qualify if:
- History of chronic renal failure requiring dialysis (including placement of fistula if performed in preparation for dialysis) or kidney transplant.
- A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control).
- Initiation of intensive insulin treatment (a pump or multiple daily injections) within 4 months prior to randomization or plans to do so in the next 4 months.
- A condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participant undergoing elective vitrectomy surgery if indicated during the study.
- Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of randomization that involved treatment with any drug that has not received regulatory approval for the indication being studied.
- Note: participants cannot receive another investigational drug while participating in the study.
- Known allergy to any component of the study drug or any drug used in the injection prep (including povidone iodine).
- Blood pressure \> 180/110 (systolic above 180 or diastolic above 110).
- If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, potential participant can become eligible.
- Systemic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or pro-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment within 4 months prior to randomization.
- These drugs cannot be used during the study.
- For women of child-bearing potential: pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant within the next two years.
- Women who are potential participants should be questioned about the potential for pregnancy. Investigator judgment is used to determine when a pregnancy test is needed.
- Potential participant is expecting to move out of the area of the clinical center to an area not covered by another clinical center during the two years.
- Evidence of traction detachment involving or threatening the macula.
- +16 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Jaeb Center for Health Researchlead
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticalscollaborator
- National Eye Institute (NEI)collaborator
Study Sites (62)
Retinal Diagnostic Center
Campbell, California, 95008, United States
Macula & Retina Institute
Glendale, California, 91203, United States
Atlantis Eye Care
Huntington Beach, California, 92647, United States
Loma Linda University Health Care, Department of Ophthalmology
Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States
Shashi D Ganti, MD PC
Porterville, California, 93257, United States
Florida Retina Consultants
Lakeland, Florida, 33805, United States
Southeast Eye Institute, P.A. dba Eye Associates of Pinellas
Pinellas Park, Florida, 33782, United States
Retina Associates of Sarasota
Sarasota, Florida, 34233, United States
Retina Associates of Florida, P.A.
Tampa, Florida, 33609, United States
Emory Eye Center
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Southeast Retina Center, P.C.
Augusta, Georgia, 30909, United States
Marietta Eye Clinic
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Thomas Eye Group
Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30328, United States
Gailey Eye Clinic
Bloomington, Illinois, 61704, United States
Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Carle Foundation Hospital
Urbana, Illinois, 61801, United States
Raj K. Maturi, MD, PC
Indianapolis, Indiana, 42690, United States
John-Kenyon American Eye Institute
New Albany, Indiana, 47150, United States
Retina Associates, P.A.
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66204, United States
Paducah Retinal Center
Paducah, Kentucky, 42001, United States
Eye Associates of Northeast Louisiana dba Haik Humble Eye Center
West Monroe, Louisiana, 71291, United States
Elman Retina Group, P.A.
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237, United States
Wilmer Eye Institute at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Valley Eye Physicians and Surgeons
Ayer, Massachusetts, 01432, United States
Joslin Diabetes Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, United States
Henry Ford Health System, Dept of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
Retina Specialists of Michigan
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49546, United States
Retina Center, PA
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55404, United States
Mayo Clinic Department of Ophthalmology
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Mid-America Retina Consultants, P.A.
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States
The Retina Institute
St Louis, Missouri, 63128, United States
The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary/Faculty Eye Practice
New York, New York, 10003, United States
MaculaCare
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Retina-Vitreous Surgeons of Central New York, PC
Syracuse, New York, 13224, United States
Kittner Eye Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27517, United States
Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Assoc., PA
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210, United States
Retina Associates of Cleveland, Inc.
Beachwood, Ohio, 44122, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Retina Vitreous Center
Edmond, Oklahoma, 73013, United States
Dean A. McGee Eye Institute
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Oregon Retina, LLP
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
Retina Northwest, PC
Portland, Oregon, 97221, United States
Casey Eye Institute
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
Retina Vitreous Consultants
Monroeville, Pennsylvania, 15146, United States
Palmetto Retina Center
West Columbia, South Carolina, 29169, United States
Southeastern Retina Associates
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421, United States
Southeastern Retina Associates, P.C.
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909, United States
Southwest Retina Specialists
Amarillo, Texas, 79106, United States
Retina Research Center
Austin, Texas, 78705, United States
Retina and Vitreous of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77025, United States
Baylor Eye Physicians and Surgeons
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Texas Retina Associates
Lubbock, Texas, 79424, United States
Valley Retina Institute
McAllen, Texas, 78503, United States
Medical Center Ophthalmology Associates
San Antonio, Texas, 78240, United States
Retinal Consultants of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78240, United States
Spokane Eye Clinic
Spokane, Washington, 99204, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226, United States
UBC/VCHA Eye Care Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 3N9, Canada
University Health Network - Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
Related Publications (3)
Beaulieu WT, Maguire MG, Antoszyk AN; DRCR Retina Network. Changes in activity impairment and work productivity after treatment for vitreous hemorrhage due to proliferative diabetic retinopathy: Secondary outcomes from a randomized controlled trial (DRCR Retina Network Protocol AB). PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0293543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293543. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37972038DERIVEDGlassman AR, Beaulieu WT, Maguire MG, Antoszyk AN, Chow CC, Elman MJ, Jampol LM, Salehi-Had H, Sun JK; DRCR Retina Network. Visual Acuity, Vitreous Hemorrhage, and Other Ocular Outcomes After Vitrectomy vs Aflibercept for Vitreous Hemorrhage Due to Diabetic Retinopathy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 1;139(7):725-733. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1110.
PMID: 33956075DERIVEDAntoszyk AN, Glassman AR, Beaulieu WT, Jampol LM, Jhaveri CD, Punjabi OS, Salehi-Had H, Wells JA 3rd, Maguire MG, Stockdale CR, Martin DF, Sun JK; DRCR Retina Network. Effect of Intravitreous Aflibercept vs Vitrectomy With Panretinal Photocoagulation on Visual Acuity in Patients With Vitreous Hemorrhage From Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Dec 15;324(23):2383-2395. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23027.
PMID: 33320223DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Adam Glassman
- Organization
- JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Andrew Antoszyk, MD
Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Assoc., PA
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2016
First Posted
August 8, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2020
Study Completion
January 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 20, 2021
Results First Posted
January 19, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02