Cortical Plasticity After Motor Cortex Stimulation in Healthy Subject and Chronic Pain Patients
Study of Sensory-motor Cortex Plasticity After Motor Cortex Stimulation in Healthy Subject and Chronic Pain Patients
2 other identifiers
interventional
65
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the induction of sensory-motor cortex plasticity after motor cortex stimulation in healthy subjects, using laser-evoked nociceptive cortical potentials, and in chronic neuropathic pain patients using functional MRI. As a secondary goal, the project will analyse possible correlations between the magnitude of cortical plasticity and that of the pain-relieving effect. In healthy subjects, cortical plasticity is evaluated by the comparison of somatosensory cortical maps before and after two isolated sessions of 20 Hz and theta-burst rTMS, in a cross-over randomized study. Two sessions of 5 consecutive days of rTMS are proposed to the patients with a minimum of 4 weeks between the two sessions, defined by 20 Hz and theta-burst stimulation in a cross-over randomized order. Cortical plasticity of the motor cortex is evaluated via functional MRI (motor activation) performed before the first rTMS session and the last day of each session of rTMS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 21, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 21, 2016
CompletedNovember 21, 2025
November 1, 2025
7.1 years
July 26, 2016
November 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
cortical plasticity induced by rTMS - - Somatosensory evoked potentials
Assessment of plastic changes induced in sensori-motor cortex by the application of repetitive magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects and chronic pain patients. * In healthy subjects, mapping of cortical responses amplitude and source reconstruction techniques (dipole modelisation, BESA) before / after a single rTMS session * In chronic pain patients, contrast analysis between extent and location of motor activations (to hand, foot and mouth contraction) before / after one week of daily rTMS, analysed with Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM12)
just before the isolated 20 Hz or theta-burst stimulation for healthy subjects
cortical plasticity induced by rTMS - - Somatosensory evoked potentials
Assessment of plastic changes induced in sensori-motor cortex by the application of repetitive magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects and chronic pain patients. * In healthy subjects, mapping of cortical responses amplitude and source reconstruction techniques (dipole modelisation, BESA) before / after a single rTMS session * In chronic pain patients, contrast analysis between extent and location of motor activations (to hand, foot and mouth contraction) before / after one week of daily rTMS, analysed with Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM12)
just after the isolated 20 Hz or theta-burst stimulation for healthy subjects
cortical plasticity induced by rTMS -- fMRI
Assessment of plastic changes induced in sensori-motor cortex by the application of repetitive magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects and chronic pain patients. * In healthy subjects, mapping of cortical responses amplitude and source reconstruction techniques (dipole modelisation, BESA) before / after a single rTMS session * In chronic pain patients, contrast analysis between extent and location of motor activations (to hand, foot and mouth contraction) before / after one week of daily rTMS, analysed with Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM12)
within 1 week before the first day of stimulation (20 Hz or theta-burst) for the patients
cortical plasticity induced by rTMS -- fMRI
Assessment of plastic changes induced in sensori-motor cortex by the application of repetitive magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects and chronic pain patients. * In healthy subjects, mapping of cortical responses amplitude and source reconstruction techniques (dipole modelisation, BESA) before / after a single rTMS session * In chronic pain patients, contrast analysis between extent and location of motor activations (to hand, foot and mouth contraction) before / after one week of daily rTMS, analysed with Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM12)
after the 5th day of stimulation (20 Hz or theta-burst) for the patients
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Nonparametric (Chi-2) contrast of dichotomized pain reports before/after rTMS and extent of fMRI activation change (also dichotomized) MRI T1 3D and T2*
within 1 week before the first day of stimulation Stats after 40 patients studied.
Nonparametric (Chi-2) contrast of dichotomized pain reports before/after rTMS and extent of fMRI activation change (also dichotomized) MRI T1 3D and T2*
after the 5th day of stimulation. Stats after 40 patients studied.
Linear and nonlinear correlation between the magnitude of induced cortical plasticity and the magnitude of pain relief induced by rTMS. MRI T1 3D and T2*,
within 1 week before the first day of stimulation Stats after 40 patients studied.
Linear and nonlinear correlation between the magnitude of induced cortical plasticity and the magnitude of pain relief induced by rTMS. MRI T1 3D and T2*,
after the 5th day of stimulation. Stats after 40 patients studied.
Study Arms (2)
healthy volunteers
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with resistant pain
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
20Hz and Theta Burst stimulation, both at 80% of motor threshold in contralateral intrinsic hand muscles. Five consecutive days of each mode of stimulation, separated by a minimum of 4 weeks. Daily self-monitoring of pain, sleep quality and fatigue by mans of a 10-item questionnaire
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy subjects aged from 18 to 70 years, male or female, with social protection, fully informed and having given their written consent.
- patients :
- aged from 18 to 80 years, male or female, with social protection , fully informed and having given their written consent.
- unilateral pharmacoresistant neuropathic pain during at least one year,
- without any change of the pharmacological treatment since at least one month
You may not qualify if:
- for healthy subjects only:
- history of chronic pain
- analgesic medication within 24h before stimulation
- For patients only: new analgesic treatment within 1 month before consent
- for both:
- drug addiction, headache, epilepsy history
- ferromagnetic intracranial device
- implanted stimulator
- absence of contraceptive method for women of childbearing age
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Service d'Exploration, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Est, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, F-69495, France et NeuroPain lab - CRNL (Inserm U1028 - UCBL)
Bron, 69500, France
Related Publications (1)
Andre-Obadia N, Hodaj H, Hodaj E, Simon E, Delon-Martin C, Garcia-Larrea L. Better Fields or Currents? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Transcranial Magnetic (rTMS) Versus Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Neuropathic Pain. Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Jan;20(1):207-219. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01303-x. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
PMID: 36266501RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nathalie ANDRE-OBADIA, MD
Service d'Exploration, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Est, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, F-69495, France et NeuroPain lab - CRNL (Inserm U1028 - UCBL)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 26, 2016
First Posted
July 29, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2009
Primary Completion
November 21, 2016
Study Completion
November 21, 2016
Last Updated
November 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share