Improving ADHD Teen Driving
1 other identifier
interventional
152
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Teens with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) have high rates of negative driving outcomes, including motor vehicle crashes, which may be caused by visual inattention (i.e., looking away from the roadway to perform secondary tasks). A driving intervention that trains teens to reduce instances of looking away from the roadway will be tested in teens with ADHD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 21, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 3, 2023
CompletedMarch 3, 2023
February 1, 2023
4.9 years
May 4, 2016
January 6, 2023
February 8, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Number of Extended Glances Away From Roadway During Driving Simulation
Participants completed a simulated drive in a driving simulator with an integrated eye-tracking system. Participants completed two 15-minute drives. During each drive, participants engaged in 14 secondary tasks. The secondary task consisted of searching for streets on a GPS map and lasted for 30 seconds. Eye gaze was sampled continuously. Eye gaze data was summarized by calculating the number of extended (≥2 secs) glances away from the roadway during the 14 secondary task periods per drive. This was our primary outcome for visual behavior during driving. Descriptive estimates reflect averages across the 2 drives. However, for analyses, estimates for each drive were statistically modeled with a two-level drive variable.
1-month post-training
Standard Deviation of Lateral Position During Driving Simulation
Participants completed a simulated drive in a driving simulator with an integrated eye-tracking system. Participants completed two 15-minute drives. During each drive, participants engaged in 14 secondary tasks. The secondary task consisted of searching for streets on a GPS map and lasted for 30 seconds. Lateral position was sampled continuously. Standard deviation of lane position was calculated for the 14 secondary task periods per drive. Estimates reflect averages across the 2 drives. However, for analyses, estimates for each drive were statistically modeled with a two-level drive variable.
1-month post-training
Number of Extended Glances Away From Roadway During Driving Simulation
Participants completed a simulated drive in a driving simulator with an integrated eye-tracking system. Participants completed two 15-minute drives. During each drive, participants engaged in 14 secondary tasks. The secondary task consisted of searching for streets on a GPS map and lasted for 30 seconds. Eye gaze was sampled continuously. Eye gaze data was summarized by calculating the number of extended (≥2 secs) glances away from the roadway during the 14 secondary task periods per drive. This was our primary outcome for visual behavior during driving. Descriptive estimates reflect averages across the 2 drives. However, for analyses, estimates for each drive were statistically modeled with a two-level drive variable.
6-months post-training
Standard Deviation of Lateral Position During Driving Simulation
Participants completed a simulated drive in a driving simulator with an integrated eye-tracking system. Participants completed two 15-minute drives. During each drive, participants engaged in 14 secondary tasks. The secondary task consisted of searching for streets on a GPS map and lasted for 30 seconds. Lateral position was sampled continuously. Standard deviation of lane position was calculated for the 14 secondary task periods per drive. Estimates reflect averages across the 2 drives. However, for analyses, estimates for each drive were statistically modeled with a two-level drive variable.
6-months post-training
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Incidents, Crashes, and Near-crashes Recorded With DriveCam
12 months
Number of DriveCam Events That Are Preceded by a 2 Second or Greater Glance Away From the Roadway
12 months
Study Arms (2)
FOCAL+Training
EXPERIMENTALRules of the Road Training
SHAM COMPARATORInterventions
Weekly for 5 weeks, teens complete a computer training program designed to train teens to limit the length of glances away from the roadway. On a computer, the top portion of the screen plays a simulated video drive while the bottom half of the screen contains a map. Teens complete tasks that require switching between the 2 halves of the screen. While doing so, they receive feedback regarding how long they are looking away from the driving portion of the screen. After each session of computerized FOCAL training, teens will complete two 5-minute simulated drives. During the drives, teens will be cued to a complete a visual search task which will require them to divert their gaze from the road. Eye tracking goggles will monitor eye glances and provide real time auditory feedback when a visual glance away from the roadway exceeds 2 secs.
Weekly for 5 weeks, teens will perform computer-based training regarding traffic codes, laws, and rules of the road. After each computerized training, teens will complete two 5-minute drives. This time in the driving simulator will be contextualized as a time for them to practice the rules of the road they learned during training. Importantly, teens in the sham intervention group will complete the same distraction tasks but will NOT receive any feedback regarding their eye gaze during simulated driving.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 16-19.
- Must meet DSM-5 ADHD criteria for ADHD-Predominantly Inattentive Presentation or ADHD-Combined Presentation based on the K-SADS interview.
- Possess a valid driver's license and regularly spend at least 3 hours per week engaged in unsupervised driving.
- IQ ≥80 as measured by the Wechsler Abbreviated Intelligence Scale-II (WASI-II)
- Parent willing to participate..
You may not qualify if:
- On ADHD medication that cannot be washed out on assessment days.
- Drug or alcohol dependence according to K-SADS interview.
- On psychotropic or neuroleptic medications.
- Require eye glasses (contacts acceptable) for driving (corrective vision restriction on driver's license).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnatilead
- St. Louis Universitycollaborator
- University of Massachusetts, Amherstcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Center for ADHD, Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States
Related Publications (1)
Epstein JN, Garner AA, Kiefer AW, Peugh J, Tamm L, MacPherson RP, Simon JO, Fisher DL. Trial of Training to Reduce Driver Inattention in Teens with ADHD. N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 1;387(22):2056-2066. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204783.
PMID: 36449421DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jeff Epstein, Ph.D.
- Organization
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeff Epstein, Ph.D
Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2016
First Posted
July 28, 2016
Study Start
December 21, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
March 3, 2023
Results First Posted
March 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share