Gastric Preparation of Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
2
Brief Summary
By using three different Gastric Preparation of Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy, the investigators hope to find out the optimal gastric preparation plan.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started May 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedJuly 27, 2016
July 1, 2016
7 months
July 21, 2016
July 26, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the level of gastric cleansing
Two investigators who did not know which kind of gastric preparation of the patient scored the level of gastric cleansing 0f 120 participants according to a four-point grading scale: poor, fair, good, and excellent,which was pointed 3,2,1,and 0.The investigators should evaluate the gastric cleansing of six anatomical landmarks (cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum and pylorus).A poor level of cleansing indicated the mucosa was obscured largely by a lot of air bubbles and grume,fair indicated that a portion of the mucosa was obscured by air bubbles and grume that was enough to prevent a reliable visualization of polyps, good indicated that a small amount of air bubbles and grume,and excellent indicated that the fluid was clear and the image was either free or had only small bits of air bubbles and grume.
4 month
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Transit time
4 month
Diagnostic yield of Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy
4 month
Tolerability of participants
4 month
the visibility of gastric
4 month
the time of gastric examination
4 month
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
clear water group
PLACEBO COMPARATORthe patients only drink 1000ml clear water before checking
simethicone group
EXPERIMENTALthe patients drink 950ml clear water and 15ml simethicone before checking
simethicone combined with pronase group
EXPERIMENTALthe patients drink 900ml clear water and 15ml simethicone and 20,000iu pronase before checking
Interventions
the patients just drink common clear water before Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy examination
the patients drink clear water and simethicone (Espumisan; Berlin-Chemie, Germany, containing 40 mg simethicone in 1 mL emulsion) before Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy examination
the patients drink simethicone (Espumisan; Berlin-Chemie, Germany, containing 40 mg simethicone in 1 mL emulsion),pronase granules(Deyou;Beijing Tide Pharmaceutical Co,China,containing 20,000iu pronase),and clear water before Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy examination
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged 16-75 years, who were scheduled to undergo a Magnetic-controlled Capsule Endoscopy, were eligible for this study.
You may not qualify if:
- Dysphagia or symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction, suspected or known intestinal stenosis, overt gastrointestinal bleeding, history of upper gastrointestinal surgery or abdominal surgery altering gastrointestinal anatomy, or postabdominal radiation;
- Congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, under therapeutic anticoagulation, in poor general condition (American Society of Anesthesiologists class III/IV), claustrophobia, metallic parts, a pacemaker or other implanted electromedical devices, artificial heart valves;
- Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy;
- Currently participating in another clinical study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Changhai Hospital
Shanghai, China
Changhai Hospital
Shanghai, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., Associate Professor, Associate Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2016
First Posted
July 27, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
July 27, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07