DE-CT in Lung Cancer Proton Therapy
DE-CT
DE-CT vs. SE-CT as Optimal Imaging During Treatment for Adaptive Proton Therapy in Stage III Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Dose distribution calculations for proton therapy are more accurate when based on DE-CT than on SE-CT. It is however unclear what the quantitative benefit of repeated DE-CT calculations is for lung cancer patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 26, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedApril 14, 2017
August 1, 2016
1 year
July 19, 2016
April 13, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Dose distribution on the CTV (measured in Gy)
Dose distribution on the CTV (clinical target volume) of the tumour and the lymph nodes of DE-CT vs. SE-CT
Measured during 2nd and 4th week of radiation treatment
Dose distribution on the OAR (measured in Gy)
Dose distribution on the OAR (organs at risk), lungs, heart, aorta, pulmonary artery, superior vena cava, oesophagus, spinal cord, vertebral body, of DE-CT vs. SE-CT
Measured during 2nd and 4th week of radiation treatment
Study Arms (1)
Scans
EXPERIMENTALPatients included in the trial will receive DE-CT in stead of SE-CT's.
Interventions
Patients included in the trial will receive 3 extra DE-CT's and 3 extra SE-CT's
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced stage IIIA or III B (T0-4 N2-3M0) NSCLC, or M1 oligometastatic disease according to 7th TNM classification.
- Scheduled to receive concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy to a dose of at least 60 Gy, as decided at the multidisciplinary tumour board
- Able to give written informed consent
- Able to have adequate contraception in woman with child bearing potential
You may not qualify if:
- Not able to give written informed consent
- Not able to comply with adequate contraception in woman with child bearing potential
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
MAASTRO clinic
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 ET, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dirk De Ruysscher, MD, PhD
Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2016
First Posted
July 26, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 14, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share