Soft Tissue Thickness on Submerged and Non Submerged Implants
The Influence of Soft Tissue Thickness On Crestal Bone Changes Around Submerged and Nonsubmerged Implants: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
35
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Changes in the marginal bone level surrounding the implant are the frequently used parameters in assessing the short- and long-term success. Multiple biological and biomechanical factors have been reported to adversely affect marginal bone level. Recently, initial vertical mucosal tissue thickness has also been reported to have an impact on bone stability.The hypothesis of present study is that soft tissue thickness on implant placement has no positive impact of crestal bone remodeling.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2009
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2016
CompletedJuly 22, 2016
July 1, 2016
2.1 years
July 11, 2016
July 20, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Crestal bone loss
Crestal bone loss was measured on radiographs between baseline-4th month after placement
Change from baseline crestal bone level at 4th month after placement,
Crestal bone loss
Crestal bone loss was measured on radiographs between baseline-6th month after placement
Change from baseline crestal bone level at 6th month after placement,
Crestal bone loss
Crestal bone loss was measured on radiographs between baseline-12th month after placement
Change from baseline crestal bone level at 12th month after placement,
Crestal bone loss
Crestal bone loss was measured on radiographs between baseline-18th month after placement
Change from baseline crestal bone level at 18th month after placement,
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Probing depth
Evaluation of probing depth at 4th month after placement (mm)
Probing depth
Evaluation of probing depth at 6th month after placement (mm)
Probing depth
Evaluation of probing depth at 12th month after placement (mm)
Probing depth
Evaluation of probing depth at 18th month after placement (mm)
Keratinized tissue level
Evaluation of keratinized tissue level at 4th month after placement (mm)
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Nonsubmerged thick group
ACTIVE COMPARATORNonsubmerged type of implants placed with thick (\>3 mm) soft tissue
Nonsubmerged thin group
ACTIVE COMPARATORNonsubmerged type of implants placed with thin (\<3 mm) soft tissue
Submerged thick group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubmerged type of implants placed with thick (\>3 mm) soft tissue
Submerged thin group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubmerged type of implants placed with thin (\<3 mm) soft tissue
Interventions
One or two stages of implants within thin and thick gingiva were monitored 1.5 year after placement
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- being older than 18 years of age
- generally healthy patients, no medical contraindication for implant surgery
- missing teeth in upper jaw posterior and more than one tooth in neighbourhood area
- no bone augmentation procedures before and during implant placement.
You may not qualify if:
- poor oral hygiene
- history of periodontitis
- smoking
- diabetes
- alcoholism
- taking medication which interferes soft and hard tissue healing
- bruxism.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ege Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Deniz Cengiz Özkaya, PhD,DDS
Ege University, School of Dentistry
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD, DDS
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2016
First Posted
July 22, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
November 1, 2011
Study Completion
November 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 22, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07