Comparison of Transforaminal vs. Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Injection
Comparison of Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection: Transforaminal vs. Parasagittal Interlaminar Approach
1 other identifier
interventional
56
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy, incidence of ventral epidural spreading and provocation of concordant paresthesia, amount of radiation exposure and total procedure time between transforaminal and parasagittal interlaminar epidural injection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 25, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 20, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedNovember 29, 2017
November 1, 2017
10 months
May 25, 2016
November 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical efficacy
Numerical rating scale
2 weeks after study completion
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Intervention related time
1 minutes after the completion of the intervention
Exposed radiation amount during intervention
1 minutes after the completion of the intervention
Study Arms (2)
epidural steroid injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORTF epidural steroid (dexamethasone) injection
IL epidural steroid injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORPS interlaminar epidural steroid(dexamethasone) injection
Interventions
spinal injections performed in epidural space to relieve chronic low back pain or leg pain
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- central spinal stenosis
- herniated nucleus pulposus.
You may not qualify if:
- Lateral spinal stenosis
- Internal disc disruption
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2016
First Posted
July 20, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share