NCT02834117

Brief Summary

Embryo freezing is a technique used regularly to optimize the pregnancy rate in case of infertility. This method is performed in presence of supernumerary embryo(s) after fresh transfer, or after freeze all embryos in case of medical reasons. It is necessary to control that the transfer is performed when the endometrium is receptive, which is essential for embryo implantation and pregnancy. This period is defined as the "implantation window". Endometrial preparation can be achieved by hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or moderate ovarian stimulation (SO). The implantation window can also be assessed by monitoring of a natural cycle (NC). The objectives of this open randomized study is to compare the number of visits (ultrasound and blood tests) induced by the SO or NC as well as the women quality of life in both groups.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
124

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2015

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2015

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 3, 2015

Completed
11 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 15, 2016

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2018

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

February 6, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

September 3, 2015

Last Update Submit

February 5, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Ovulation Inductionquality of lifeReproductive Physiological Processesfertility

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of visits

    number of visits (for clinical examination, ultrasound and hormonal dosage) required to monitor ovulation in both groups

    From inclusion visit to embryo transfer : up to 90 days

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Fertiqol

    From inclusion visit to embryo transfer : up to 90 days

  • defrost cancellation rate

    From inclusion visit to embryo transfer : up to 90 days

  • transfer on weekends and holidays

    From inclusion visit to embryo transfer : up to 90 days

  • HCG levels> 100 U / L

    From inclusion visit to pregnancy test : up to 100 days

  • pregnancy

    From pregnancy test to ultrasound at 6 week of gestation : up to 100 days

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Natural cycle

OTHER

Ovulation is not induced by drugs

Other: natural cycle

Moderate ovarian stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Ovulation is induced by recombinant follitropin alpha and recombinant choriogonadotropin

Drug: moderate ovarian stimulation

Interventions

Ovulation is not induced by drugs

Also known as: natural
Natural cycle

Ovulation is induced by recombinant follitropin alpha and recombinant choriogonadotropin

Also known as: ovarian stimulation
Moderate ovarian stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 38 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Affiliation to the general social security regime and benefiting from 100% infertility;
  • Regular Cycles 26 to 35 days;
  • Support in IVF or ICSI ;
  • Existence of at least 2 frozen embryos to J2 or J3;
  • Treated for their first or second cycle of TEC.

You may not qualify if:

  • Donor sperm;
  • Irregular cycles and / or polycystic ovary syndrome;
  • Embryos frozen at J1 or J5 / J6 or double planned transfer or transfer of 3 embryos intended;
  • Patients who have had more than 3 transfers or more than 6 embryos replaced without pregnancy or puncture rank\> 3;
  • uterine malformation existing;
  • Presence of a hydrosalpinx.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHI Creteil

Créteil, 94000, France

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • Bjuresten K, Landgren BM, Hovatta O, Stavreus-Evers A. Luteal phase progesterone increases live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):534-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.019. Epub 2010 Jun 26.

    PMID: 20579989BACKGROUND
  • Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2084-91. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der171. Epub 2011 Jun 10.

    PMID: 21665875BACKGROUND
  • de La Rochebrochard E, Quelen C, Peikrishvili R, Guibert J, Bouyer J. Long-term outcome of parenthood project during in vitro fertilization and after discontinuation of unsuccessful in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jul;92(1):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.067. Epub 2008 Aug 15.

    PMID: 18706550BACKGROUND
  • Eftekhar M, Rahmani E, Pourmasumi S. Evaluation of clinical factors influencing pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014 Jul;12(7):513-8.

    PMID: 25114675BACKGROUND
  • El Bahja D, Hertz P, Schweitzer T, Lestrade F, Ragage JP. [Frozen embryo transfer protocol: does spontaneous cycle give good results?]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2013 Nov;41(11):648-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.08.007. Epub 2012 Feb 16. French.

    PMID: 22342107BACKGROUND
  • Fatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abbeel E, Griesinger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.036. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

    PMID: 20097333BACKGROUND
  • Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AE, Kollen BJ, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ. What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Sep-Oct;19(5):458-70. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt030. Epub 2013 Jul 2.

    PMID: 23820515BACKGROUND
  • Haouzi D, Assou S, Mahmoud K, Tondeur S, Reme T, Hedon B, De Vos J, Hamamah S. Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients. Hum Reprod. 2009 Jun;24(6):1436-45. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep039. Epub 2009 Feb 26.

    PMID: 19246470BACKGROUND
  • Nargund G, Wei CC. Successful planned delay of ovulation for one week with indomethacin. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996 Sep;13(8):683-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02069650. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8897131BACKGROUND
  • Park SJ, Goldsmith LT, Skurnick JH, Wojtczuk A, Weiss G. Characteristics of the urinary luteinizing hormone surge in young ovulatory women. Fertil Steril. 2007 Sep;88(3):684-90. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.045. Epub 2007 Apr 16.

    PMID: 17434509BACKGROUND
  • Tobler KJ, Zhao Y, Weissman A, Majumdar A, Leong M, Shoham Z. Worldwide survey of IVF practices: trigger, retrieval and embryo transfer techniques. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;290(3):561-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3232-6. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

    PMID: 24744054BACKGROUND
  • Tomas C, Alsbjerg B, Martikainen H, Humaidan P. Pregnancy loss after frozen-embryo transfer--a comparison of three protocols. Fertil Steril. 2012 Nov;98(5):1165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1058. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

    PMID: 22840239BACKGROUND
  • Troude P, Guibert J, Bouyer J, de La Rochebrochard E; DAIFI Group. Medical factors associated with early IVF discontinuation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

    PMID: 24461478BACKGROUND
  • Weissman A, Levin D, Ravhon A, Eran H, Golan A, Levran D. What is the preferred method for timing natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer? Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Jul;19(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60048-x.

    PMID: 19573293BACKGROUND
  • Yu J, Ma Y, Wu Z, Li Y, Tang L, Li Y, Deng B. Endometrial preparation protocol of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jan;291(1):201-11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3396-0. Epub 2014 Jul 31.

    PMID: 25091221BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Ovulation Induction

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Reproductive Techniques, AssistedReproductive TechniquesTherapeuticsInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Nathalie Massin, MD

    CHIC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2015

First Posted

July 15, 2016

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion

February 1, 2018

Study Completion

March 1, 2018

Last Updated

February 6, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations