Natural Cycle Versus Stimulated Cycle Before Frozen Embryo Transfer
SONTEC
Comparison of the Number of Visits and the Quality of Life Versus Natural Cycle in Stimulated Cycle Before Frozen Embryo Transfer
1 other identifier
interventional
124
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Embryo freezing is a technique used regularly to optimize the pregnancy rate in case of infertility. This method is performed in presence of supernumerary embryo(s) after fresh transfer, or after freeze all embryos in case of medical reasons. It is necessary to control that the transfer is performed when the endometrium is receptive, which is essential for embryo implantation and pregnancy. This period is defined as the "implantation window". Endometrial preparation can be achieved by hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or moderate ovarian stimulation (SO). The implantation window can also be assessed by monitoring of a natural cycle (NC). The objectives of this open randomized study is to compare the number of visits (ultrasound and blood tests) induced by the SO or NC as well as the women quality of life in both groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started May 2015
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2018
CompletedFebruary 6, 2019
February 1, 2019
2.8 years
September 3, 2015
February 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of visits
number of visits (for clinical examination, ultrasound and hormonal dosage) required to monitor ovulation in both groups
From inclusion visit to embryo transfer : up to 90 days
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Fertiqol
From inclusion visit to embryo transfer : up to 90 days
defrost cancellation rate
From inclusion visit to embryo transfer : up to 90 days
transfer on weekends and holidays
From inclusion visit to embryo transfer : up to 90 days
HCG levels> 100 U / L
From inclusion visit to pregnancy test : up to 100 days
pregnancy
From pregnancy test to ultrasound at 6 week of gestation : up to 100 days
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Natural cycle
OTHEROvulation is not induced by drugs
Moderate ovarian stimulation
EXPERIMENTALOvulation is induced by recombinant follitropin alpha and recombinant choriogonadotropin
Interventions
Ovulation is induced by recombinant follitropin alpha and recombinant choriogonadotropin
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Affiliation to the general social security regime and benefiting from 100% infertility;
- Regular Cycles 26 to 35 days;
- Support in IVF or ICSI ;
- Existence of at least 2 frozen embryos to J2 or J3;
- Treated for their first or second cycle of TEC.
You may not qualify if:
- Donor sperm;
- Irregular cycles and / or polycystic ovary syndrome;
- Embryos frozen at J1 or J5 / J6 or double planned transfer or transfer of 3 embryos intended;
- Patients who have had more than 3 transfers or more than 6 embryos replaced without pregnancy or puncture rank\> 3;
- uterine malformation existing;
- Presence of a hydrosalpinx.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHI Creteil
Créteil, 94000, France
Related Publications (15)
Bjuresten K, Landgren BM, Hovatta O, Stavreus-Evers A. Luteal phase progesterone increases live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):534-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.019. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
PMID: 20579989BACKGROUNDBoivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2084-91. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der171. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
PMID: 21665875BACKGROUNDde La Rochebrochard E, Quelen C, Peikrishvili R, Guibert J, Bouyer J. Long-term outcome of parenthood project during in vitro fertilization and after discontinuation of unsuccessful in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jul;92(1):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.067. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
PMID: 18706550BACKGROUNDEftekhar M, Rahmani E, Pourmasumi S. Evaluation of clinical factors influencing pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014 Jul;12(7):513-8.
PMID: 25114675BACKGROUNDEl Bahja D, Hertz P, Schweitzer T, Lestrade F, Ragage JP. [Frozen embryo transfer protocol: does spontaneous cycle give good results?]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2013 Nov;41(11):648-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.08.007. Epub 2012 Feb 16. French.
PMID: 22342107BACKGROUNDFatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abbeel E, Griesinger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2054-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.036. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
PMID: 20097333BACKGROUNDGroenewoud ER, Cantineau AE, Kollen BJ, Macklon NS, Cohlen BJ. What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Sep-Oct;19(5):458-70. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt030. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
PMID: 23820515BACKGROUNDHaouzi D, Assou S, Mahmoud K, Tondeur S, Reme T, Hedon B, De Vos J, Hamamah S. Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients. Hum Reprod. 2009 Jun;24(6):1436-45. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep039. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
PMID: 19246470BACKGROUNDNargund G, Wei CC. Successful planned delay of ovulation for one week with indomethacin. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996 Sep;13(8):683-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02069650. No abstract available.
PMID: 8897131BACKGROUNDPark SJ, Goldsmith LT, Skurnick JH, Wojtczuk A, Weiss G. Characteristics of the urinary luteinizing hormone surge in young ovulatory women. Fertil Steril. 2007 Sep;88(3):684-90. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.045. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
PMID: 17434509BACKGROUNDTobler KJ, Zhao Y, Weissman A, Majumdar A, Leong M, Shoham Z. Worldwide survey of IVF practices: trigger, retrieval and embryo transfer techniques. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;290(3):561-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3232-6. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
PMID: 24744054BACKGROUNDTomas C, Alsbjerg B, Martikainen H, Humaidan P. Pregnancy loss after frozen-embryo transfer--a comparison of three protocols. Fertil Steril. 2012 Nov;98(5):1165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1058. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
PMID: 22840239BACKGROUNDTroude P, Guibert J, Bouyer J, de La Rochebrochard E; DAIFI Group. Medical factors associated with early IVF discontinuation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.018. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
PMID: 24461478BACKGROUNDWeissman A, Levin D, Ravhon A, Eran H, Golan A, Levran D. What is the preferred method for timing natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer? Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Jul;19(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60048-x.
PMID: 19573293BACKGROUNDYu J, Ma Y, Wu Z, Li Y, Tang L, Li Y, Deng B. Endometrial preparation protocol of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jan;291(1):201-11. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3396-0. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
PMID: 25091221BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nathalie Massin, MD
CHIC
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2015
First Posted
July 15, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
March 1, 2018
Last Updated
February 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share