Is Six Weeks Too Long for First Outpatient Review After Cardiac Surgery?
FORCAST6
The First Planned Outpatient Review After Cardiac Surgery: Is Six Weeks Too Long?
1 other identifier
observational
85
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although the first outpatient review following cardiac surgery is conventionally scheduled for six weeks after hospital discharge, there is no evidence to support this practice. Thirty-day mortality and morbidity rates, which are now widely used as indicators of the quality of surgical care, reveal rates that are higher than corresponding in-hospital rates. Secondly, the rates for mortality and morbidity occurring up to 6 weeks after surgery are not known. The objectives of our study are to determine the postoperative mortality and morbidity rates in the 6-week interval between hospital discharge and the first planned specialist review after cardiac surgery, and to assess the level of patient satisfaction with current practice. The study will enrol eligible patients who are undergoing elective and urgent coronary artery bypass and/or valve surgery at our institution over a 6-month period and provide them with study information. Prior to discharge after surgery, prospective participants will be consented and given a questionnaire to take home, complete and bring along to the outpatient appointment. The investigators will analyse the data to determine the rates and timing of the complications, and the impact on postoperative recovery. The investigators will also assess the level of patient satisfaction with the current practice. Appropriate conclusions either in support of current practice or, a change in practice would be drawn..
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2016
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedJuly 12, 2019
July 1, 2019
11 months
April 26, 2016
July 11, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The proportion of participants with postoperative mortality, or complications who require further interventions and hospital readmission .
Patients who require further interventions and hospital readmission.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The timing of postoperative mortality
6 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass and/or valve surgery.
- Patients who can read and write in English
You may not qualify if:
- Postoperative stroke with neurologic deficit
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Castle Hill Hospital
Hull, East Yorkshire, HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom
Related Publications (16)
Shroyer AL, Coombs LP, Peterson ED, Eiken MC, DeLong ER, Chen A, Ferguson TB Jr, Grover FL, Edwards FH; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Jun;75(6):1856-64; discussion 1864-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00179-6.
PMID: 12822628BACKGROUNDFox JP, Suter LG, Wang K, Wang Y, Krumholz HM, Ross JS. Hospital-based, acute care use among patients within 30 days of discharge after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jul;96(1):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.091. Epub 2013 May 21.
PMID: 23702228BACKGROUNDHannan EL, Zhong Y, Lahey SJ, Culliford AT, Gold JP, Smith CR, Higgins RS, Jordan D, Wechsler A. 30-day readmissions after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May;4(5):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.01.010.
PMID: 21596331BACKGROUNDSiregar S, Groenwold RH, de Mol BA, Speekenbrink RG, Versteegh MI, Brandon Bravo Bruinsma GJ, Bots ML, van der Graaf Y, van Herwerden LA. Evaluation of cardiac surgery mortality rates: 30-day mortality or longer follow-up? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Nov;44(5):875-83. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt119. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
PMID: 23471150BACKGROUNDHwang YJ, Minnillo BJ, Kim SP, Abouassaly R. Assessment of healthcare quality metrics: Length-of-stay, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality for radical nephrectomy with inferior vena cava thrombectomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Mar-Apr;9(3-4):114-21. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2547.
PMID: 26085868BACKGROUNDShih T, Dimick JB. Reliability of readmission rates as a hospital quality measure in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;97(4):1214-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.11.048. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
PMID: 24492060BACKGROUNDLahey SJ, Campos CT, Jennings B, Pawlow P, Stokes T, Levitsky S. Hospital readmission after cardiac surgery. Does "fast track" cardiac surgery result in cost saving or cost shifting? Circulation. 1998 Nov 10;98(19 Suppl):II35-40.
PMID: 9852877BACKGROUNDHall MH, Esposito RA, Pekmezaris R, Lesser M, Moravick D, Jahn L, Blenderman R, Akerman M, Nouryan CN, Hartman AR. Cardiac surgery nurse practitioner home visits prevent coronary artery bypass graft readmissions. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 May;97(5):1488-93; discussion 1493-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.12.049. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
PMID: 24612701BACKGROUNDLawson EH, Hall BL, Louie R, Ettner SL, Zingmond DS, Han L, Rapp M, Ko CY. Association between occurrence of a postoperative complication and readmission: implications for quality improvement and cost savings. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):10-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828e3ac3.
PMID: 23579579BACKGROUNDWick EC, Shore AD, Hirose K, Ibrahim AM, Gearhart SL, Efron J, Weiner JP, Makary MA. Readmission rates and cost following colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1475-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822ff8f0.
PMID: 22067174BACKGROUNDStewart RD, Campos CT, Jennings B, Lollis SS, Levitsky S, Lahey SJ. Predictors of 30-day hospital readmission after coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Jul;70(1):169-74. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01386-2.
PMID: 10921703BACKGROUNDHannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G, Ryan TJ, Isom OW, Bennett E, Jones RH. Predictors of readmission for complications of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2003 Aug 13;290(6):773-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.6.773.
PMID: 12915430BACKGROUNDPrice JD, Romeiser JL, Gnerre JM, Shroyer AL, Rosengart TK. Risk analysis for readmission after coronary artery bypass surgery: developing a strategy to reduce readmissions. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Mar;216(3):412-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.11.009. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
PMID: 23313544BACKGROUNDBillah B, Reid CM, Shardey GC, Smith JA. A preoperative risk prediction model for 30-day mortality following cardiac surgery in an Australian cohort. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 May;37(5):1086-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.11.021. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
PMID: 20117015BACKGROUNDLancaster E, Postel M, Satou N, Shemin R, Benharash P. Introspection into institutional database allows for focused quality improvement plan in cardiac surgery: example for a new global healthcare system. Am Surg. 2013 Oct;79(10):1040-4.
PMID: 24160795BACKGROUNDShahian DM, He X, O'Brien SM, Grover FL, Jacobs JP, Edwards FH, Welke KF, Suter LG, Drye E, Shewan CM, Han L, Peterson E. Development of a clinical registry-based 30-day readmission measure for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Circulation. 2014 Jul 29;130(5):399-409. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007541. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
PMID: 24916208BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dumbor Ngaage, MS, FRCS
Castle Hill Hospital, Kingston-Upon-Hull, HU16 5JQ, UK
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2016
First Posted
July 14, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
July 12, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to make individual participant data available.