Evaluation of P-321 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease
Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel Group Study of P-321 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease Assessing Safety and Efficacy Over 28 Days
1 other identifier
interventional
47
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of treatment with 0.017% P-321 on Dry Eye Symptoms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jul 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 11, 2018
CompletedOctober 11, 2018
August 1, 2017
11 months
July 1, 2016
June 29, 2018
September 12, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 29 (Visit 4) in the Subject-reported Dry Eye Symptom Questionnaire.
Dry Eye symptoms were obtained using the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaire. The questionnaire utilizes separate Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for the frequency and the Severity of symptoms. The scores range from 0 to 100 where 0 = Rarely or Very Mild, and 100 = All the Time or Very Severe for the Frequency and Severity of the symptoms, respectively. The Global Score as reported in the Primary Outcome is obtained by taking the square root of the product of the frequency score multiplied by the severity score. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline to Day 29
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change From Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 29 in Symptom Frequency Scores
Baseline to Day 29
Change From Baseline (Visit 2) to Day 29 in Symptom Severity Scores
Baseline to Day 29
Change From Baseline to Day 29 in Fluorescein Staining of the Cornea.
Baseline to Day 29
Change From Baseline to Day 29 in Lissamine Green Staining of the Conjunctiva.
Baseline to Day 29
Number of Participants With at Least 20% Improvement in Symptoms From Baseline to Day 29
Baseline to Day 29
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution
EXPERIMENTAL0.017% P-321 Ophthalmic Solution TID for 28 days.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORP-321 Ophthalmic Solution Placebo TID for 28 days.
Interventions
P-321 Ophthalmic Solution 0.017%
Placebo to match P-321 Ophthalmic Solution
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provide written informed consent
- Male or female subjects aged 18 to 80 years, inclusive
- Have a history of dry eye disease (DED) in both eyes
- Be on stable regimens of other needed medications
- Have a BCVA of +0.7 or better as assessed by Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)
- Have reported symptoms
- Have the following signs in at least one eye: Schirmer score without anesthesia of \>1 and \<10 mm at 5 minutes and staining of conjunctival and corneal areas of the eye.
- Have normal lid anatomy
You may not qualify if:
- Have undergone refractive eye surgery in the past 12 months
- Have undergone previous eyelid surgery in either eye (External blepharoplasty not resulting in exposure or abnormal blinking is allowed)
- Have lid irregularities or deformities
- Have a history of glaucoma, a history of an elevated lOP within the past year, or an lOP in either eye \> 25 mmHg at the Screening Visit (Visit 1)
- Have any clinically significant, uncontrolled, or unstable medical or surgical conditions that could affect his or her ability to participate
- Have permanent punctal plugs, punctal occlusion, or history of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Removable punctal plugs are allowed if they have been used regularly for at least 60 days prior to the screening visit. However, if a plug comes out during the study it must be promptly replaced.
- Have clinical findings of severe Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) in the Study Eye
- Are pregnant or breast feeding
- Use of any investigational product or device within 28 days prior to the Screening Visit or during the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Parion Scienceslead
Study Sites (7)
Sall Research Medical Center
Artesia, California, 90701, United States
Tauber Eye Center
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States
Ophthalmology Associates
St Louis, Missouri, 63131, United States
Comprehensive Eye Care, Ltd.
Washington, Missouri, 63090, United States
UNC Kittner Eye Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27517, United States
Ocular Surface Center, Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Virginia Eye Consultants
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jose Boyer
- Organization
- Parion Sciences
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jose Boyer
Parion Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2016
First Posted
July 13, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 11, 2018
Results First Posted
October 11, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-08