NCT02818595

Brief Summary

Many cognitive functions in humans are based on asymmetrical brain networks. For example, in most adults, the language is essentially processed by the left hemisphere, while other auditory functions, such as voice recognition, tend to be processed by the right hemisphere. Many studies, especially those conducted by Ghislaine Dehaene's team, have demonstrated the presence of anatomical and functional asymmetries by the first months of life. What are the causes of these asymmetries? How do they develop? Are they necessary for functioning or effective learning? This study, conducted in collaboration with the Compiègne applied mathematics team (Abdelatif El Badia) and the INSERM team (Ghislaine Dehaene), is designed to determine the stage of development at which hemispheric dominance for voice recognition is first observed and to identify the brain structure involved in preterm neonates whose sound environment is usually very different from that of the foetus. The impact of this environment on the infant's brain development and early learning will be evaluated.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
22

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2013

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 30, 2016

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

June 24, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 16, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

voice recognition

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • The difference in amplitude

    The difference in amplitude of the electrical hemodynamic responses to stimuli depending on the conditions, which corresponds to the evoked potential mismatch Response

    10 weeks

  • The difference in latency

    The difference in latency of the electrical hemodynamic responses to stimuli depending on the conditions, which corresponds to the evoked potential mismatch Response

    10 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Normal children

EXPERIMENTAL

Every child meet the age criteria and without ductus arteriosus persistence ultrasound or detectable neurological disorders after clinical, neurophysiological and radiological

Device: electroencephalogram (HR-EEG)Device: Near Infra Red Spectroscopy (NIRS)

Abnormal children

EXPERIMENTAL

Every child meet the criteria of age and having a detectable neurological disease after clinical, neurophysiological and radiological as intraventricular hemorrhage .

Device: electroencephalogram (HR-EEG)Device: Near Infra Red Spectroscopy (NIRS)

Interventions

Abnormal childrenNormal children
Abnormal childrenNormal children

Eligibility Criteria

Age0 Days - 6 Days
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • The distribution of children in the different groups of infants included in the study will be validated at the time of the acquisitions.
  • Normal group of children: A child meets the age criteria and without ductus arteriosus persistence ultrasound or detectable neurological disorders after clinical, neurophysiological and radiological (ETF, Scanner, MRI).
  • Group of children meet the age criteria and with cerebral neurological pathology detectable after clinical, neurophysiological and radiological (ETF, Scanner, MRI).

You may not qualify if:

  • About history:
  • All children with severe congenital malformation
  • Regarding the study period;
  • Any refusal of a parent
  • Children with severe impairment of the general condition and vital functions
  • Children with dermatitis of the face or scalp
  • Children treated with ventilation High Frequency (HFO)
  • Presence of intravenous access on the scalp (preventing the realization of the ETF, EEG and NIRS

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CHU Amiens

Amiens, 80054, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Beauchemin M, Gonzalez-Frankenberger B, Tremblay J, Vannasing P, Martinez-Montes E, Belin P, Beland R, Francoeur D, Carceller AM, Wallois F, Lassonde M. Mother and stranger: an electrophysiological study of voice processing in newborns. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Aug;21(8):1705-11. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq242. Epub 2010 Dec 13.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Premature Birth

Interventions

Electroencephalography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Obstetric Labor, PrematureObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic Techniques, NeurologicalDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisElectrodiagnosis

Study Officials

  • Fabrice WALLOIS, MD, PhD

    CHU Amiens

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2016

First Posted

June 30, 2016

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion

June 1, 2017

Study Completion

June 1, 2017

Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations