Development of Maternal Voice Recognition in Preterm Neonates
PREMAVOIX
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many cognitive functions in humans are based on asymmetrical brain networks. For example, in most adults, the language is essentially processed by the left hemisphere, while other auditory functions, such as voice recognition, tend to be processed by the right hemisphere. Many studies, especially those conducted by Ghislaine Dehaene's team, have demonstrated the presence of anatomical and functional asymmetries by the first months of life. What are the causes of these asymmetries? How do they develop? Are they necessary for functioning or effective learning? This study, conducted in collaboration with the Compiègne applied mathematics team (Abdelatif El Badia) and the INSERM team (Ghislaine Dehaene), is designed to determine the stage of development at which hemispheric dominance for voice recognition is first observed and to identify the brain structure involved in preterm neonates whose sound environment is usually very different from that of the foetus. The impact of this environment on the infant's brain development and early learning will be evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedSeptember 19, 2025
September 1, 2025
4.3 years
June 24, 2016
September 16, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The difference in amplitude
The difference in amplitude of the electrical hemodynamic responses to stimuli depending on the conditions, which corresponds to the evoked potential mismatch Response
10 weeks
The difference in latency
The difference in latency of the electrical hemodynamic responses to stimuli depending on the conditions, which corresponds to the evoked potential mismatch Response
10 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Normal children
EXPERIMENTALEvery child meet the age criteria and without ductus arteriosus persistence ultrasound or detectable neurological disorders after clinical, neurophysiological and radiological
Abnormal children
EXPERIMENTALEvery child meet the criteria of age and having a detectable neurological disease after clinical, neurophysiological and radiological as intraventricular hemorrhage .
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The distribution of children in the different groups of infants included in the study will be validated at the time of the acquisitions.
- Normal group of children: A child meets the age criteria and without ductus arteriosus persistence ultrasound or detectable neurological disorders after clinical, neurophysiological and radiological (ETF, Scanner, MRI).
- Group of children meet the age criteria and with cerebral neurological pathology detectable after clinical, neurophysiological and radiological (ETF, Scanner, MRI).
You may not qualify if:
- About history:
- All children with severe congenital malformation
- Regarding the study period;
- Any refusal of a parent
- Children with severe impairment of the general condition and vital functions
- Children with dermatitis of the face or scalp
- Children treated with ventilation High Frequency (HFO)
- Presence of intravenous access on the scalp (preventing the realization of the ETF, EEG and NIRS
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Amiens
Amiens, 80054, France
Related Publications (1)
Beauchemin M, Gonzalez-Frankenberger B, Tremblay J, Vannasing P, Martinez-Montes E, Belin P, Beland R, Francoeur D, Carceller AM, Wallois F, Lassonde M. Mother and stranger: an electrophysiological study of voice processing in newborns. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Aug;21(8):1705-11. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq242. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
PMID: 21149849RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fabrice WALLOIS, MD, PhD
CHU Amiens
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2016
First Posted
June 30, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09