Interest of CARE Rule to Exclude the Hypothesis of an Acute Coronary Syndrome Without Bioassay - ICARE
ICARE
Intérêt de la règle CARE Pour Exclure l'hypothèse d'un Syndrome Coronarien Aigu Sans Dosage Biologique - ICARE
1 other identifier
observational
1,453
2 countries
6
Brief Summary
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major health problem and its diagnosis remains a challenge for the emergency physician. The management of a suspected ACS is well codified, based on troponin assays, renewed if necessary. Conversely, the criteria leading to initiate a diagnostic procedure in chest pain to the Emergency department are unclear. The fear is, firstly, to miss a potentially life treating diagnosis and, secondly, exposing many patients to unnecessary examinations. The advent of highly sensitive troponin assays also increases the risk of over-investigation by a larger number of elevations of the biomarker in non-coronary circumstances leading to a prolongation of hospitalization and, possibly, unnecessary treatments and invasive investigations. CARE rule could help to streamline this first step. It is established by assigning a value from 0 to 2 to the items: Characteristic of pain, Age, Risk factors and ECG. The search for an ACS is not justified if the sum of points is ≤1 (negative rule) and, conversely, a troponin should be performed if the sum is \> 1 (positive rule). Indeed, CARE rule corresponds to the first 4 items of the HEART score (the latter standing for troponin at admission) whose reliability has been demonstrated, a ≤3 income excluding ACS with a risk of false negatives \<2%. A negative CARE rule always corresponds to a HEART score ≤3. Our study aims to confirm the interest of CARE rule to streamline the search for an ACS in chest pain as an observational European multicenter prospective study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2016
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2018
CompletedApril 6, 2018
April 1, 2018
1.2 years
June 10, 2016
April 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The failure rate of the diagnostic strategy will be evaluated by the rate of MACE recorded in the course of the phone call follow-up at 45 days of patient's inclusion in the group of patients with negative CARE rule.
This rate is a composite criterion including myocardial infarction, percutaneaous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or sudden death for which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. The procedure will be considered acceptable if the rate of false negatives among patients with negative CARE rule is less than 1% with an upper limit of the 95% confidence interval lower than 3%.
Day 45
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The failure rate of the HEART score only considering only one dosage of troponin at admission assessed by the proportion of MACE at 45 days in the HEART group ≤3
Day 45
Number of bioassay which could be saved, measured by the difference between the number of bioassays actually made least the number bioassays requested by the strategy
Day 45
Difference between average times of consultation according to the need for a bioassay based on CARE rule
Day 45
Study Arms (1)
CARE Rule
Evaluation of the clinical suspicion of myocardial infarction and calculation of CARE rule.
Interventions
Evaluation of the clinical suspicion of myocardial infarction, calculation of CARE rule and troponin assay performed by the practitioner.
Eligibility Criteria
Adults with non-traumatic chest pain
You may qualify if:
- patient admitted to the emergency department or chest pain
- patient admitted in a non-scheduled manner
- non-traumatic chest pain
- no formal diagnosis after frontline examinations
You may not qualify if:
- patient with an ECG showing a coronary syndrome ST +
- patient for which a 6-weeks follow-up would be impossible
- patient refusing to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Brussels, Belgium
University Hospital Angers
Angers, 49933, France
Hospital of Cholet
Cholet, France
SCHOTTE Thibault
Le Mans, France
Hospital of Saint-Malo
St-Malo, France
University Hospital Toulouse
Toulouse, France
Related Publications (1)
Moumneh T, Penaloza A, Cismas A, Charpentier S, Schotte T, Pernet S, Malatest S, Prunier F, Warnant A, Mezdad TH, Gangloff C, Soulat L, Douillet D, Riou J, Roy PM. Evaluation of HEAR score to rule-out major adverse cardiac events without troponin test in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Eur J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 1;28(4):292-298. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000791.
PMID: 34187993DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2016
First Posted
June 27, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2018
Study Completion
January 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 6, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04