NCT02813499

Brief Summary

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major health problem and its diagnosis remains a challenge for the emergency physician. The management of a suspected ACS is well codified, based on troponin assays, renewed if necessary. Conversely, the criteria leading to initiate a diagnostic procedure in chest pain to the Emergency department are unclear. The fear is, firstly, to miss a potentially life treating diagnosis and, secondly, exposing many patients to unnecessary examinations. The advent of highly sensitive troponin assays also increases the risk of over-investigation by a larger number of elevations of the biomarker in non-coronary circumstances leading to a prolongation of hospitalization and, possibly, unnecessary treatments and invasive investigations. CARE rule could help to streamline this first step. It is established by assigning a value from 0 to 2 to the items: Characteristic of pain, Age, Risk factors and ECG. The search for an ACS is not justified if the sum of points is ≤1 (negative rule) and, conversely, a troponin should be performed if the sum is \> 1 (positive rule). Indeed, CARE rule corresponds to the first 4 items of the HEART score (the latter standing for troponin at admission) whose reliability has been demonstrated, a ≤3 income excluding ACS with a risk of false negatives \<2%. A negative CARE rule always corresponds to a HEART score ≤3. Our study aims to confirm the interest of CARE rule to streamline the search for an ACS in chest pain as an observational European multicenter prospective study.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,453

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Geographic Reach
2 countries

6 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 10, 2016

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2016

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 6, 2018

Status Verified

April 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

June 10, 2016

Last Update Submit

April 5, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The failure rate of the diagnostic strategy will be evaluated by the rate of MACE recorded in the course of the phone call follow-up at 45 days of patient's inclusion in the group of patients with negative CARE rule.

    This rate is a composite criterion including myocardial infarction, percutaneaous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting or sudden death for which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. The procedure will be considered acceptable if the rate of false negatives among patients with negative CARE rule is less than 1% with an upper limit of the 95% confidence interval lower than 3%.

    Day 45

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • The failure rate of the HEART score only considering only one dosage of troponin at admission assessed by the proportion of MACE at 45 days in the HEART group ≤3

    Day 45

  • Number of bioassay which could be saved, measured by the difference between the number of bioassays actually made least the number bioassays requested by the strategy

    Day 45

  • Difference between average times of consultation according to the need for a bioassay based on CARE rule

    Day 45

Study Arms (1)

CARE Rule

Evaluation of the clinical suspicion of myocardial infarction and calculation of CARE rule.

Other: CARE Rule

Interventions

Evaluation of the clinical suspicion of myocardial infarction, calculation of CARE rule and troponin assay performed by the practitioner.

CARE Rule

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adults with non-traumatic chest pain

You may qualify if:

  • patient admitted to the emergency department or chest pain
  • patient admitted in a non-scheduled manner
  • non-traumatic chest pain
  • no formal diagnosis after frontline examinations

You may not qualify if:

  • patient with an ECG showing a coronary syndrome ST +
  • patient for which a 6-weeks follow-up would be impossible
  • patient refusing to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc

Brussels, Belgium

Location

University Hospital Angers

Angers, 49933, France

Location

Hospital of Cholet

Cholet, France

Location

SCHOTTE Thibault

Le Mans, France

Location

Hospital of Saint-Malo

St-Malo, France

Location

University Hospital Toulouse

Toulouse, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Moumneh T, Penaloza A, Cismas A, Charpentier S, Schotte T, Pernet S, Malatest S, Prunier F, Warnant A, Mezdad TH, Gangloff C, Soulat L, Douillet D, Riou J, Roy PM. Evaluation of HEAR score to rule-out major adverse cardiac events without troponin test in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Eur J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 1;28(4):292-298. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000791.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chest PainAcute Coronary Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2016

First Posted

June 27, 2016

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion

January 1, 2018

Study Completion

January 1, 2018

Last Updated

April 6, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-04

Locations