Benefits of the HiResolution Bionic Ear System in Adults With Asymmetric Hearing Loss
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this feasibility study is to evaluate the benefit of unilateral implantation in adults who have severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss in one ear, and up to moderate sensorineural hearing loss in the other ear (asymmetric hearing loss).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 23, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 7, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 25, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 21, 2023
CompletedAugust 21, 2023
July 1, 2023
3.4 years
June 7, 2016
December 2, 2022
July 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change in Consonant Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) Word Recognition Test (Implanted Ear Only)
The post-implant CNC word scores were compared to preimplant word scores. The CNC monosyllabic word test is a validated test of open-set word recognition ability. The test was administered in quiet at 60 target 0° azimuth) and scored as total number of words correct which is expressed for results/reporting as percentage correct. The CNC word test was the primary speech perception metric used for study inclusion determination and postoperative outcome comparison at defined intervals for this feasibility study. A higher percentage of recognized words represents better hearing of spoken words. The intent is to understand the benefit of the implant treatment option and restoration of auditory input results in improved speech understanding.
Baseline and Twelve months
Change in Unaided Hearing Thresholds (Contralateral, Non-Implanted Ear, Only)
Unaided audiometric thresholds compared to preimplant. Standard audiometric procedures were used for the testing of inter-octave frequencies as necessary. • Unaided air conduction thresholds using insert earphones at octave frequencies were measured for the contralateral, non-implanted ear at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 and 8000 Hz. Clinical masking was completed as appropriate.
Baseline and Twelve months
Change in Speech Perception (Bilateral Listening Condition) - Speech Front, Noise Front
AzBio speech scores in speech front, noise front twelve months post implantation compared to preimplant bilateral sentence scores. The AzBio speech testing was the primary speech perception metric used for baseline and postoperative outcome comparison at defined intervals for this feasibility study. A higher percentage of recognized words represents better hearing of spoken words.
Baseline and Twelve months
Change in Lateralization Ability Testing (Bilateral Listening Condition)
Lateralization is ability to recognize the location of sound origin compared to preimplantation. The subject was asked to identify if the sentence was heard from the right or left loudspeaker. Scoring was based on the number of sentence locations correctly identified and expressed as a percent average. A higher percent average indicates a better ability to identify sound location.
Baseline and Twelve months
Change in Speech Perception (Bilateral Listening Condition) - Speech Front/Noise to Implanted Ear
AzBio word scores in speech front, noise to implanted ear twelve months post implantation compared to preimplant bilateral sentence scores. The AzBio speech testing was a speech perception metric used for baseline and postoperative outcome comparison at defined intervals for this feasibility study. A higher percentage of recognized words represents better hearing of spoken words.
Baseline to Twelve Months
Bilateral Listening Condition (Both Ears - Everyday Listening Condition for Each Ear) - Speech Front /Noise to Non-Implanted Ear.
AzBio speech scores in speech front, noise to the contralateral ear at 12 months post implantation compared to preimplant bilateral sentence scores. The baseline speech perception testing was a speech perception metric used for baseline and postoperative outcome comparison at defined intervals for this feasibility study. A higher percentage of recognized words represents better hearing of spoken words.
Baseline to Twelve Months
Study Arms (1)
HiResolution Bionic Cochlear Implant
EXPERIMENTALHiRes 90K™ Advantage implant with HiFocus™ 1J electrode, HiRes 90K™ Advantage implant with the HiFocus Helix™ electrode, HiRes 90K™ Advantage implant with the HiFocus™ Mid-Scala electrode or the HiRes™ Ultra Implant with the HiFocus™ Mid-Scala electrode will be implanted in adults who have severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss in one ear, and up to moderate sensorineural hearing loss in the other ear (asymmetric hearing loss).
Interventions
HiRes 90K™ Advantage implant with HiFocus™ 1J electrode, HiRes 90K™ Advantage implant with the HiFocus Helix™ electrode, HiRes 90K™ Advantage implant with the HiFocus™ Mid-Scala electrode or the HiRes™ Ultra Implant with the HiFocus™ Mid-Scala electrode will be implanted in adults with eligible hearing profile.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- General Requirements:
- Ability to provide Informed Consent
- years of age or older
- English language proficiency
- Willingness to participate in all scheduled procedures outlined in the study investigational plan
- Willingness to use an approved cochlear implant signal processing strategy in an everyday listening program during study
- Ear to be Implanted:
- Severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (\> 70 dB HL) as defined by the pure tone average for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz
- CNC word recognition score ≤30% (tested in subject's everyday listening condition for that ear)
- Duration of severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (≥ 70 dB HL) \>3 months and ≤10 years in the ear to be implanted only
- Contralateral (non-implanted) ear:
- Up to a moderate sensorineural hearing loss (\<70 dB HL) as defined by the pure tone average for 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz
- CNC word recognition score \>30% (tested in subject's everyday listening condition for that ear)
You may not qualify if:
- Previous experience with a cochlear implant
- Cochlear malformation or obstruction (i.e. ossification) that would preclude full insertion of electrode array in the ear to be implanted
- Medical or psychological conditions that contraindicate surgery or impact the ability to manage an implanted device or the study related procedures as determined by the investigator
- Diagnosis of auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony in either the ear to be implanted or the contralateral ear
- Active middle-ear disease/infection in the ear to be implanted
- Unrealistic expectations regarding potential benefits, risks and limitations inherent to implant surgical procedures as determined by the investigator
- Unwillingness or inability of subject to comply with all investigational requirements as determined by the investigator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Advanced Bionicslead
Study Sites (2)
The Silverstein Institute
Sarasota, Florida, 34239, United States
Virginia Mason Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98101, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Ankur Kaushal, VP of Global Regulatory Affairs
- Organization
- Advanced Bionics
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2016
First Posted
June 23, 2016
Study Start
November 7, 2016
Primary Completion
March 25, 2020
Study Completion
March 25, 2020
Last Updated
August 21, 2023
Results First Posted
August 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07