Comparison of In-Person Versus Remote Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluations
Comparison of Patient & Provider Outcomes With In-Person Versus Remote Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluations
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare remote and in-person audiological cochlear implant candidacy evaluations (including audiological (hearing) testing and counseling sessions) in a rural Appalachian region.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 17, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 10, 2017
CompletedFebruary 13, 2020
February 1, 2020
1.9 years
February 6, 2016
February 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
(Aim 1): Comparison of Remote Audiological Testing Scores with In-Person Audiological Testing Scores
Arizona Biological (AzBio) scores gathered remotely via the telemedicine system will be compared to AzBio scores gathered via in-person (face-to-face) per participant.
2 weeks
(Aim 2): Remote Cochlear Implant Counseling Completion Rate
The number of participants that enroll into Aim 2 will be recorded and compared to the number of participants that complete all study-related activities within this Aim.
45 minutes
(Aim 2): In-Person Cochlear Implant Counseling Participant Feedback
Participants in Aim 2 that receive an in-person session will complete a 6-question satisfaction questionnaire post cochlear implant counseling session.
10 minutes
(Aim 2): In-Person Cochlear Implant Counseling Provider Feedback
Provider(s) in Aim 2 that deliver in-person session(s) will complete a 6-question satisfaction questionnaire post cochlear implant counseling session.
10 minutes
(Aim 2): Remote Cochlear Implant Counseling Participant Feedback
Participants in Aim 2 that receive a remote session will complete a 13-question satisfaction questionnaire post cochlear implant counseling session.
10 minutes
(Aim 2): Remote Cochlear Implant Counseling Provider Feedback
Provider(s) in Aim 2 that deliver remote session(s) will complete a 13-question satisfaction questionnaire post cochlear implant counseling session.
10 minutes
(Aim 2): Stage of Change toward Seeking Hearing Rehabilitation
Participants in Aim 2 will complete the University of Rhode Island (URICA) questionnaire post cochlear implant counseling session. This questionnaire will determine the participant's stage of change toward seeking hearing rehabilitation. These URICA scores will be compared to URICA scores gathered in Aim 1 for each participant.
2-4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
In-Person CI Counseling Session
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants (n=6) randomized to receive an in-person CI counseling session will receive what normally occurs with patients pursuing cochlear implantation. The counseling will last 30-45 minutes and consists 5 key components: an explanation of the patient's hearing testing results, a discussion of the impact of hearing loss on the patient's life, treatment options for hearing loss including hearing aid amplification and cochlear implantation, an explanation of how CIs function and the necessary steps in candidacy and rehabilitation, and an outline of the expected outcomes following cochlear implantation.
Remote CI Counseling Session
EXPERIMENTALParticipants (n=6) randomized to receive a remote CI counseling session will be receiving the counseling session remotely. The participants will be counseled remotely by the audiologist located in Lexington, KY via the telemedicine system (intervention). This counseling will last 30-45 minutes and consists 5 key components: an explanation of the patient's hearing testing results, a discussion of the impact of hearing loss on the patient's life, treatment options for hearing loss including hearing aid amplification and cochlear implantation, explanation of how CIs function and the necessary steps in candidacy and rehabilitation, and an outline of the expected outcomes following cochlear implantation.
Interventions
The remote setup includes a 500 series teleconference audio and video live set-up. The teleconference set-up will be situated on a telemedicine cart and placed within the sound-proof booth at the testing site (UK ENT practice in Morehead, KY). The audiologist will deliver the session remotely.
The standard face-to-face counseling that will occur between the participant and audiologist is the standard of care. No technology will be used. The audiologist will deliver the session face-to-face with the participant in the same room (standard practice).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (\>18) who are current patients at the University of Kentucky Morehead Clinic
- Adults who have moderate to profound hearing loss
- Adults who can speak and understand English since cochlear implantation candidacy testing is performed using standardized word lists in English
You may not qualify if:
- Adults with prelingual deafness
- Adults who use sign language as a primary means of communication
- Adults with active otological infections with otorrhea or cerumen impaction seen on otoscopy
- Pregnant women since pregnant women are not cochlear implant surgical candidates
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Matthew Bush, MDlead
Study Sites (1)
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
Related Publications (2)
Laplante-Levesque A, Hickson L, Worrall L. Stages of change in adults with acquired hearing impairment seeking help for the first time: application of the transtheoretical model in audiologic rehabilitation. Ear Hear. 2013 Jul-Aug;34(4):447-57. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182772c49.
PMID: 23364333BACKGROUNDFletcher KT, Dicken FW, Adkins MM, Cline TA, McNulty BN, Shinn JB, Bush ML. Audiology Telemedicine Evaluations: Potential Expanded Applications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jul;161(1):63-66. doi: 10.1177/0194599819835541. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
PMID: 30832542RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew L Bush, MD
University of Kentucky Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2016
First Posted
February 17, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 10, 2017
Study Completion
December 10, 2017
Last Updated
February 13, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share