Influence of Propranolol on Conditioned Pain Modulation
Konditionerende Smertestimuli - Sammenligning af Forskellige Test og Konditioneringsmodaliteter
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
An extensive amount of studies indicate that conditioned pain modulation (CPM) test paradigms can be of use to evaluate the efficacy of the endogenous pain inhibition pathway in healthy controls and pain patients. A number of studies indicate that the autonomic nervous system (ANS) responds to painful stimulation by parasympathetic activity withdrawal and up-regulation of sympathetic activity (flight-or-fight mode), but it remains unknown whether these responses predict individual pain susceptibility or CPM efficacy and whether different pain modalities evoke different physiological stress responses, i.e. do individuals with low pain tolerance exhibit more vigorous ANS responses when subjected to controlled acute pain stimuli, and do high ANS responsiveness to pain coincide with altered psychophysical pain levels/CPM efficacy. This study aims to investigate the effect of ANS responsiveness on CPM paradigms and to investigate if an exogenous, pharmaceutically induced decrease in the sympathetic drive of the ANS will yield decreased CPM efficacy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 22, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedJune 28, 2017
June 1, 2017
6 months
June 15, 2016
June 27, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
CPM efficacy
A test stimuli will be applied and compared with a test stimuli simultaneous a condition stimuli.
1-2 hours after propranolol/placebo and after 10 minutes break.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Temporal summation of pain
1-2 hours after propranolol/placebo and after 10 minutes break.
Heart-rate variability
1-2 hours after propranolol/placebo and after 10 minutes break.
Offset analgesia
1-2 hours after propranolol/placebo and after 10 minutes break.
Study Arms (2)
Propranolol
ACTIVE COMPARATORPropranolol is a beta-blocker
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy subjects
You may not qualify if:
- Drug addiction defined as the use of cannabis, opioids or other drugs
- Previous history of neurologic, musculoskeletal, mental illnesses or a chronic pain condition
- Lack of ability to cooperate
- Current use of medications that may affect the trial, e.g., analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs
- Consumption of alcohol, caffeine, nicotine or painkillers the morning and until termination of the study on the study day
- Recent history of acute pain affecting the lower limb
- Participation in other pain trials throughout the study period
- Known diagnosis of cardio vascular diseases (low blood pressure, heart conditions)
- Asthma
- Decreased function of liver and kidneys
- Diabetes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Center for Sensory Motor Interaction, Aalborg University
Aalborg East, 9220, Denmark
Related Publications (1)
Petersen KK, Andersen HH, Tsukamoto M, Tracy L, Koenig J, Arendt-Nielsen L. The effects of propranolol on heart rate variability and quantitative, mechanistic, pain profiling: a randomized placebo-controlled crossover study. Scand J Pain. 2018 Jul 26;18(3):479-489. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0054.
PMID: 29858911DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
KRISTIAN K PETERSEN, Ph.D.
Aalborg University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.Sc, Ph.d.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2016
First Posted
June 22, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06