NCT02802189

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the combine effect of the integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique (soft tissue mobilization techniques protocol), in combination with the therapeutic exercise in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain in the sub-acute stage of symptoms, and to determine whether this combination substantially helps the faster and more efficient installation of adaptations of exercising.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 7, 2016

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 16, 2016

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

June 28, 2017

Status Verified

June 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

June 7, 2016

Last Update Submit

June 27, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Chronic Mechanical Neck PainexerciseIntegrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Changes in subjective perception of neck pain with the visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Pain intensity was assessed by the Visual Analog Pain Scale, which is a card with an uncalibrated scale ranging from zero to ten on the one side (with zero representing no pain and ten representing the worst pain in life) with each centimeter representing one pain level. The patient subjectively estimated his or her pain level by marking a vertical line on the uncalibrated scale between zero and ten. Then the exact value of pain intensity could be obtained with a single ruler. VAS is widely used as it is easy to implement and is characterized by good psychometric properties.

    pre-treatment, Week: 2, 4, 6,10,14, 22, 34

  • Changes in Pressure Pain threshold with pressure algometry

    Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is defined as the minimal amount of pressure that produces pain. PPT was assessed by a Wagner algometer. For the procedure of PPT measurement, the protocol recommended by Fischer was applied (Fisher, 1998). Pressure pain threshold was assessed over the upper border of the trapezius muscle halfway between the midline and the lateral border of the acromion, the levator scapulae muscle 2 cm above the lower insertion located in the upper medial border of the scapulae, Sternocleidomastoid muscle and to splenius capitis 2 cm lateral to the spinous processus of the axis.

    pre-treatment, Week: 2, 4, 6, 10, 14, 22, 34

  • Changes in functional capacity with Neck disability index questionnaire

    It is a self-reported ten-item scale. Each item assesses different neck pain complaints. Most of the items are related to restrictions in activities of daily living, and each item is expressed by 6 different assertions in the range 0-5, with 0 indicating no disability and 5 indicating the highest disability. The total score ranges from 0 to 50. Disability Index (NDI) has sufficient support in the literature, being the most commonly used to report neck pain. The Greek version of the questionnaire was used for this study.

    pre-treatment, Week 6, 10, 14, 22, 34

  • Changes in maximum isometric strength of neck muscles with Manual Muscular Testing

    Cervical flexion, extension, and side bending isometric strength were assessed using a calibrated Manual Muscular Testing device with the participants in supine and prone position.

    pre-treatment, Week: 2, 4, 6,10,14, 22, 34

  • Changes in Cervical Range of Motion with a bubble inclinometer

    Cervical active range of motion was measured with a bubble inclinometer. Active cervical flexion, extension, and side bending range of motion were assessed gravity with Participants sitting in upright position.

    pre-treatment, Week: 2, 4, 6,10,14, 22, 34

  • Changes in deep flexors muscle endurance with craniocervical flexion test

    The craniocervical flexion test (CCFT) is a clinical test of the anatomical action of the deep cervical flexor muscles, (longus capitis, and longus colli). It could be described as a test of neuromotor control. It includes the performance of five progressive stages of increasing craniocervical flexion range of motion. It is a low-load test performed in the supine position with the patient guided to each stage by feedback from a pressure sensor placed behind the neck (Chattanooga Stabilizer Pressure Biofeedback). While the test in the clinical setting provides only an indirect measure of performance, the construct validity of the CCFT has been verified in a laboratory setting by direct measurement of deep and superficial flexor muscle activity.

    pre-treatment, Week: 2, 4, 6,10,14, 22, 34

  • Changes in isometric endurance capacity of sternocleidomastoid and anterior scalene, with a handheld stopwatch

    The isometric endurance of the sternocleidomastoid and anterior scalene was assessed through 2 isometric contractions, one with no additional resistance and the other one with a kind of resistance corresponding to 30% of the maximum isometric strength. Participants were in supine position. A biofeedback device, provided the subject with motivation (auditory stimulus) encourage them to keep the contraction as long as possible. A 2-inch velcro band was secured around the forehead. The appropriate weight was suspended from the headband, and participants were asked to support the weight while maintaining a neutral head position for as long as possible. The endurance test was terminated when the position of the head changed (contact with table). Endurance time was measured using a handheld stopwatch.

    pre-treatment, Week: 2, 4, 6,10,14, 22, 34

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in quality of life with the sort form of SF-36 Health Survey

    pre-treatment, Week: 10, 14, 22, 34

Study Arms (2)

exercise and INIT group

EXPERIMENTAL

The first group (experimental) followed the exersice programme in combination with the integrated neuromuscular inhibition technique (INIT).

Other: Exercise programmeOther: Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique application.

exercise group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The protocol for this group was identical to the previous group with the sole difference that the application of INIT was not included. At the end of the exercise programme, relaxing breathing exercise and gentle stretching was applied for 15 min

Other: Exercise programme

Interventions

Endurance and Resistant training exercise program (Duration: 45 minutes) * Muscle retraining of longus colli and endurance training of the deep cervical flexors. * Resistant exercises for the muscles involved in neck flexion, extension, side bending and rotation of the neck region. Isometric contractions exercises (20-70% of MVC) and resistant exercises (12-15RM). * Active ROM exercises for the neck muscles * Upper limbs exercises with resistant bands * Stretching exercises for the neck and upper limbs muscles

exercise and INIT groupexercise group

Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique application. (Duration: 15min) The protocol was applied to the following muscles: * Upper border of the trapezius muscle * sternocleidomastoid * levator scapulae muscle * splenius capitis muscle Integrated Neuromuscular Inhibition Technique includes the combination of the following technique: * Ischemic compression * Muscle energy technique * Strain-counterstrain technique

exercise and INIT group

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with chronic neck pain with a duration of symptoms for at least three months
  • Existence of at least one active or latent trigger point in any of the muscles: levator scapulae, upper trapezoid, and splenius capitis
  • Patients whose neck pain has emerged as a result of a specific pathology, confirmed by radio-diagnostic tests (X-ray or MRI)
  • Patients with a medical referral for physical therapy with the etiology of neck pain

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are in the acute stage of symptoms
  • Patients who have participated in any kind of treatment during the last three months (physiotherapy, massage, local injections of anesthetic blocks, etc.)
  • Patients who have participated in an exercise program concerning their neck during the last six months
  • Background of neck trauma and / or surgery in the neck region
  • Inflammatory muscle diseases and joint infections, malignancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Thessaloniki, New Facilities, Thermi, Thessaloniki, 57001, Greece

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck PainMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavior

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD Candidate

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2016

First Posted

June 16, 2016

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

April 1, 2017

Study Completion

April 1, 2017

Last Updated

June 28, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-06

Locations