Psychopathological Differences Between Asperger Syndrome and Schizotypal Disorder in an Adult Sample
1 other identifier
observational
59
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to identify psychopathology (psychiatric symptoms) that can differentiate between Schizotypal Disorder (SD) and Asperger Syndrome (normal IQ, no language impairment Autism Spectrum Disorder) (AS) in young adults. With our present knowledge, the differentiation between AS and SD can be difficult, as they both present with social difficulties, odd (but not psychotic) behaviour, and a 'feeling of not being as everyone else'. Studies suggest that adults with AS symptoms are either overlooked, or diagnosed within the schizophrenia spectrum in Adult Psychiatry. A 'correct' diagnosis is important, as it is the first step towards the most optimal plan, treatment and rehabilitation for the patient. The only way to diagnose psychiatric illness is the description of present psychopathology. To identify symptoms that can differentiate between the two disorders, we will use semi-structured interviews to explore present psychopathology in young adults with typical symptoms of SD and AS respectively, with special focus on presence of alterations in self-experience. Alterations in self-experience are typical for the schizophrenia spectrum, and are therefore not thought to be equally present in AS and SD. The hypotheses are that the total level of altered experiences is higher in SD, than in AS, and with a different pattern of altered experiences in SD than in AS. If the hypotheses are true, an examination of altered self-experience will be valuable to aid clinical differentiation between the two disorders.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jun 2016
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedMarch 10, 2020
March 1, 2020
2.5 years
May 24, 2016
March 9, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Level of altered experiences
Total score, Examination of Anomalous Self Experience (EASE)
Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Pattern of most occurring altered experiences
Pattern of individual items, Examination of Anomalous Self Experience (EASE)
Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Autism Spectrum symptom load
Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Schizophrenia Spectrum symptom load
Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Self-reported Autism Spectrum symptom load
Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Self-reported Schizotypia symptom load
Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Self-reported well-being
Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Other Outcomes (2)
Global severity of symptoms assessment
Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Global functioning assessment
Assessed within 1,5 years from study inclusion start
Study Arms (2)
Asperger syndrome
1. Expert panel evaluation for identification of participants with typical symptoms 2. Semi-structured psychopathological interviews for general psychopathology, psychopathology within the schizophrenia spectrum, and psychopathology within the autism spectrum 3. Self-administered rating scales for assessment of autistic traits, schizotypal personality and subjective psychological well-being 4. Other general interviewer ratings for assessing functioning and severity of psychopathology
Schizotypal disorder
1. Expert panel evaluation for identification of participants with typical symptoms 2. Semi-structured psychopathological interviews for general psychopathology, psychopathology within the schizophrenia spectrum, and psychopathology within the autism spectrum 3. Self-administered rating scales for assessment of autistic traits, schizotypal personality and subjective psychological well-being 4. Other general interviewer ratings for assessing functioning and severity of psychopathology
Interventions
From the medical records, described social and psychiatric history and observed psychiatric symptoms will be summarized and presented to two senior psychiatric consultants. The panels evaluation ensures the identification of subjects with typical symptoms, according to a best estimate clinical consensus. The panel divides the participants into 4 groups: 'participant with symptoms typical of AS', 'participant with symptoms typical of SD', 'participant with inconclusive/non typical symptoms' and 'non eligible participant'.
Included participants are asked for a detailed social and developmental history and interviewed with 3 semi-structured interviews: 1. Schedules for Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN); Covering psychopathology and behaviour associated with the major psychiatric disorders. 2. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), module 4; An assessment to identify symptoms within the autism spectrum. 3. Examination of anomalous self-experience (EASE); A checklist for exploration of experiential anomalies. The Ph.D.-student will obtain social and developmental history and carry out SCAN and EASE interviews. ADOS will be carried out by a consultant psychologist at The Danish Autism Centre.
1.The Autism Quotient (AQ), a 50 question scale, for the assessment of autistic traits, 2. The Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ), a 74 item scale, for the assessment of schizotypal personality, 3. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5), a 5 item scale, for the assessment of subjective psychological well-being.
1\. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), a numeric scale (1 through 100) for assessing social, occupational, and psychological functioning, 2. The Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI-Severity), an assessment of the clinician's global view of the patient's severity of psychopathology on a 7 point scale.
Eligibility Criteria
Only already diagnosed participants are recruited, from specialised units. This is essential, as inclusion of participants with typical symptoms, reduces confounding of the results by diagnostic uncertainty. Participants with SD will be recruited from OPUS-teams (a specialized treatment program for patients with first episode of schizophrenia spectrum disorder), within the Mental Health Services in the Capitol Region of Denmark, and participants with AS from The Danish Autism Centre (a non-profit organization for people with ASD).
You may qualify if:
- ICD-10 diagnosis of Asperger syndrome (F84.5) or infantile autism (F84.0) with normal IQ and no language impairments or schizotypal disorder (F21)
- Age 18-30 (both inclusive)
You may not qualify if:
- Known non-verbal IQ \< 80 (verbal IQ \< 70) or an educational level corresponding to \<9 years of primary education
- Diagnosed with both Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Psychotic symptoms (\< 1 day of duration, lifetime)
- Severe physical illness (life-limiting, or limiting interview capacity)
- Organic brain disorder (corresponding to ICD-10 chapter F00-09)
- Active heavy alcohol or substance abuse (corresponding to ICD-10 definitions)
- Not fluent in the Danish language
- Forensic patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Mental Health Centre Ballerup, Mental Health Services, The Capitol Region, Copenhagen
Ballerup Municipality, Copenhagen, 2750, Denmark
The Danish Autism Centre
Herlev, 2730, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Sidse Arnfred, MD, dr.med.
Mental Health Services, Region Zealand, Denmark
- STUDY CHAIR
Peter Handest, MD, Ph.d.
Mental Health Services, the Capitol Region, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD-student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2016
First Posted
June 15, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
March 10, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share