Single Injection Adductor Canal Block vs Catheter for Total Knee Arthroplasty
Adductor Canal Block: Single Injection vs Catheter for Pain Management of Total Knee Arthroplasty - A Randomized, Unblinded, Non-Inferiority Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
180
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study investigates single injection adductor canal block (ACB) with or without intravenous dexamethasone and adductor canal catheter for pain management of total knee arthroplasty. This is a non-inferiority trial seeking to determine whether single injection ACB with dexamethasone is "no worse" than a continuous catheter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jul 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 14, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 4, 2020
CompletedSeptember 4, 2020
September 1, 2020
5 months
June 9, 2016
August 14, 2020
September 1, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cumulative 24 Hour Oral Morphine Equivalent Consumption
Post-operative analgesia at 24 hours
24 hours (Day 1)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Cumulative 12 Hour Oral Morphine Equivalent Consumption
12 hours (Day 0)
Cumulative 48 Hour Oral Morphine Equivalent Consumption
48 hours (Day 2)
Pain Score
12, 24 and 48 hours
Quality of Recovery (QoR-40)
48 hours (Day 2)
Length of Stay
From surgical date until hospital discharge, up to 3 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Adductor Canal Block Complications
From time of catheter insertion until catheter removal, up to Day2/48 hours
Nerve Block Complications
0 to 48 hours
Study Arms (3)
Adductor Canal block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPostoperatively in the PACU, this group will receive 20ml 0.5% ropivacaine for their ACB.
Adductor canal block with dexamethasone
ACTIVE COMPARATORPostoperatively in the PACU, this group will receive 20ml 0.5% ropivacaine for their ACB along with 8mg IV dexamethasone.
Adductor canal catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATORPostoperatively in the PACU, this group will receive 20ml 0.5% ropivacaine for their adductor canal block and have a catheter placed in the adductor canal at the mid-thigh. 0.2% ropivacaine at 5ml/hr will be run for 48 hours.
Interventions
Spinal anesthesia with 2-3 ml 0.5% bupivacaine and 0-20mcg of fentanyl. At the end of the case, the surgeon will infiltrate 30ml 0.5% ropivacaine peri-articularly. 20ml 0.5% ropivacaine in the adductor canal in PACU.
Spinal anesthesia with 2-3 ml 0.5% bupivacaine and 0-20mcg of fentanyl. At the end of the case, the surgeon will infiltrate 30ml 0.5% ropivacaine peri-articularly. 20ml 0.5% ropivacaine in the adductor canal along with 8mg dexamethasone IV in PACU.
Spinal anesthesia with 2-3 ml 0.5% bupivacaine and 0-20mcg of fentanyl. At the end of the case, the surgeon will infiltrate 30ml 0.5% ropivacaine peri-articularly. 20ml 0.5% ropivacaine and a catheter placed in PACU, with a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine started.
Used in spinal anesthetic
May or may not be used in spinal anesthetic
Local anesthetic to be used by surgeon as local infiltration and by anesthesiologist in adductor canal block.
To be given intravenously at time of nerve block to one of the study arms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over or equal to the age of 18 years old who can understand the study protocol and are able to give consent
- Patients with an American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) classification 1 to 3
- Patients must have a preoperative oral 24 hour opioid consumption of less than or equal to 30 mg morphine equivalents
- Patients must be able to understand and be able to use patient controlled analgesia
- Patients must be undergoing a primary total knee arthroplasty with neuraxial anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a contraindication to neuraxial and/or regional anaesthesia
- Patients with an allergy to local anaesthetics
- Patients who have chronic pain not related to their knee joint
- Patients with chronic opioid use (daily or almost daily use \>3 months)
- Patients with contraindications to dexamethasone (allergy, infection, Insulin dependent Diabetes Mellitus)
- Patients with pre-existing neuropathy
- Patients with hepatic failure
- Patients with renal failure with eGFR\<60
- Patients with allergy to ketorolac or NSAIDs
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (9)
Perlas A, Kirkham KR, Billing R, Tse C, Brull R, Gandhi R, Chan VW. The impact of analgesic modality on early ambulation following total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):334-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318296b6a0.
PMID: 23759708BACKGROUNDKim DH, Lin Y, Goytizolo EA, Kahn RL, Maalouf DB, Manohar A, Patt ML, Goon AK, Lee YY, Ma Y, Yadeau JT. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2014 Mar;120(3):540-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000119.
PMID: 24401769BACKGROUNDAllen HW, Liu SS, Ware PD, Nairn CS, Owens BD. Peripheral nerve blocks improve analgesia after total knee replacement surgery. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jul;87(1):93-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199807000-00020.
PMID: 9661553BACKGROUNDCharous MT, Madison SJ, Suresh PJ, Sandhu NS, Loland VJ, Mariano ER, Donohue MC, Dutton PH, Ferguson EJ, Ilfeld BM. Continuous femoral nerve blocks: varying local anesthetic delivery method (bolus versus basal) to minimize quadriceps motor block while maintaining sensory block. Anesthesiology. 2011 Oct;115(4):774-81. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182124dc6.
PMID: 21394001BACKGROUNDJaeger P, Nielsen ZJ, Henningsen MH, Hilsted KL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):409-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318279fa0b.
PMID: 23241723BACKGROUNDJenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
PMID: 22221014BACKGROUNDAbdallah FW, Johnson J, Chan V, Murgatroyd H, Ghafari M, Ami N, Jin R, Brull R. Intravenous dexamethasone and perineural dexamethasone similarly prolong the duration of analgesia after supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized, triple-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):125-32. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000210.
PMID: 25629321BACKGROUNDRahangdale R, Kendall MC, McCarthy RJ, Tureanu L, Doty R Jr, Weingart A, De Oliveira GS Jr. The effects of perineural versus intravenous dexamethasone on sciatic nerve blockade outcomes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2014 May;118(5):1113-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000137.
PMID: 24686045BACKGROUNDLee S, Rooban N, Vaghadia H, Sawka AN, Tang R. A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial of Adductor Canal Block for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Single Injection Versus Catheter Technique. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1045-1051. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.018. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
PMID: 29198872DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Steven Lee
- Organization
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven Lee, MD
University of British Columbia
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2016
First Posted
June 14, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 4, 2020
Results First Posted
September 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share