NCT02793986

Brief Summary

With blocks of lumbar and lumbar plexus, we can reduce the intravenous anesthetics usage. To offer an satisfied surgery process for patients, a proper sedation is necessary. So in this study, we want to investigate the influence of two different sedative drugs on outcomes of patients received hip replacement surgery .

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
296

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2015

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 4, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 8, 2016

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 29, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 29, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

June 29, 2017

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

June 4, 2016

Last Update Submit

June 28, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Incidence of postoperative delirium

    7 days after surgery

  • Mortality in 30 days after surgery

    30 days after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Complications of cardiopulmonary system

    30 days after surgery

  • Incidence of cerebrovascular accident

    30 days after surgery

  • Out of bed time

    7 days after surgery

  • Discharge time

    30 days after surgery

  • Dosage of vasoactive agent

    During sugary

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

dexmedetomidine sedation

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients received local anesthesia, in this arm, the sedation of patients was achieved with a bolus of dexmedetomidine at 1.0 μg/kg (over a period of 15 to 20 min) and followed by an infusion of dexmedetomidine at 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/h.

Drug: dexmedetomidine

propofol sedation

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients received local anesthesia, in this arm, the sedation of patients was achieved with a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol, and the effect site concentration was set to 0.8-1.0μg/ml.

Drug: propofol

Interventions

For patients in Group P, the sedation was achieved with a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol, and the effect site concentration was set to 0.8-1.0μg/ml.

propofol sedation

For patients in Group D, the sedation was achieved with a bolus of dexmedetomidine at 1.0 μg/kg (over a period of 15 to 20 min) and followed by an infusion of dexmedetomidine at 0.2-0.7 μg/kg/h. The depth of sedation was considered enough when patient was unresponsive to voice.

dexmedetomidine sedation

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years or older and undergoing hip fracture repair

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with severe cognitive impairment (MMSE score, \<15)
  • Preoperative delirium as determined by Confusion Assessment Method
  • Contraindications to local anesthesia
  • Prior hip surgery
  • Mental or language barriers that would preclude data collection
  • Severe congestive heart failure (NewYork Heart Association class IV)
  • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines, stage III-IV)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The first affiliated hospital of Anhui Medical University

Hefei, Anhui, 230022, China

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Liu X, Xie G, Zhang K, Song S, Song F, Jin Y, Fang X. Dexmedetomidine vs propofol sedation reduces delirium in patients after cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:190-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

    PMID: 27936404BACKGROUND
  • Li X, Yang J, Nie XL, Zhang Y, Li XY, Li LH, Wang DX, Ma D. Impact of dexmedetomidine on the incidence of delirium in elderly patients after cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 9;12(2):e0170757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170757. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28182690BACKGROUND
  • Orena EF, King AB, Hughes CG. The role of anesthesia in the prevention of postoperative delirium: a systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Jun;82(6):669-83. Epub 2016 Jan 28.

    PMID: 26822815BACKGROUND
  • Su X, Meng ZT, Wu XH, Cui F, Li HL, Wang DX, Zhu X, Zhu SN, Maze M, Ma D. Dexmedetomidine for prevention of delirium in elderly patients after non-cardiac surgery: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Oct 15;388(10054):1893-1902. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30580-3. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

    PMID: 27542303BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

PropofolDexmedetomidine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Erwei Gu, PHD

    The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2016

First Posted

June 8, 2016

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 29, 2017

Study Completion

June 29, 2017

Last Updated

June 29, 2017

Record last verified: 2016-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations