Dexmedetomidine Use in ICU Sedation and Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients and Post-cardiac Surgery
DIRECT
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Increasing numbers of elderly patients are undergoing cardiac surgery. Elderly patients may have prolonged recovery following cardiac surgery when compared to other groups of patients, and are at higher risk of postoperative delirium, postoperative neurocognitive decline and reduced quality of life following hospital discharge. The goals of sedation and analgesia for patients following cardiac surgery are multifold and include postoperative pain relief, the facilitation of ventilation, resolution of hypothermia and normalization of electrolyte balances. The choice of sedative agent however can impact postoperative outcomes. Dexmedetomidine has been associated with improved quality of recovery in patients undergoing major spine surgery and with a reduced incidence of delirium, both of which can impact a patient's quality of life following surgery. The investigators hypothesized that the use of dexmedetomidine as a sedative agent immediately following cardiac surgery in elderly patients would result in improved quality of recovery and a reduced incidence of delirium in the postoperative period, when compared to propofol. The investigators were also interested as to whether there was an associated improvement in neurocognitive outcomes in this population. Questions:
- Does the use of dexmedetomidine as a sedative agent in ICU in elderly patients following cardiac surgery result in improved Quality of Recovery scores when compared with propofol?
- Does the use of dexmedetomidine as a sedative agent in ICU in elderly patients following CABG+/- AVR result in a reduced incidence of postoperative delirium as compared to propofol?
- Do these patients subsequently have a reduction in cognitive decline?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedNovember 3, 2016
November 1, 2016
1.8 years
January 27, 2016
November 1, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality of Recovery - 40
Questionnaire
Post Operative Day 3
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Minnesota Cognitive Acuity Screen
Post Operative Day 5 and 6 months post operatively
Quality of Life Score SF-36
6 months post operatively
Other Outcomes (7)
Other Secondary Outcomes - Number of Incidences of delirium
Up to 6 months post surgery date
Other Secondary Outcomes - Number of delirious days
Up to 6 months post surgery date
Other Secondary Outcomes - Time to extubation
Up to 6 months post surgery date
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received propofol for post-operative sedation
Dexmedetomidine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients received dexmedetomidine for post-operative sedation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adults over 75yrs undergoing on-pump CABG +/- AVR
You may not qualify if:
- Consent refusal
- Language barrier
- Allergy to study drugs
- Receiving other alpha 2 agonists
- Dementia \[mild cognitive impairment can be included\]
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Janette Brohan
UBC
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2016
First Posted
March 4, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2017
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
November 3, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share