NCT02791438

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of administration of azilsartan in pediatric patients aged 6 to less than 16 years with hypertension.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
27

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2016

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

30 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 1, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 6, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 18, 2016

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 4, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 4, 2019

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 23, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 7, 2020

Status Verified

February 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

June 1, 2016

Results QC Date

December 2, 2019

Last Update Submit

February 2, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs or worsens after receiving study drug.

    Up to Week 54

  • Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Anthropometric Measurement (Weight, Height and Body Mass Index (BMI))

    An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs or worsens after receiving study drug.

    Up to Week 54

  • Number Of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values of Laboratory Parameters

    The laboratory values outside the range (Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) (mg/dL) \>30, Creatinine (mg/dL) \>2.0, eGFR (mL/min/1.73m\^2) \<30, Creatine Kinase (U/L) \>5×ULN) are considered markedly abnormal.

    Up to Week 54

  • Number Of Participants With TEAEs Related To Resting 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    A standard 12-lead ECG was performed while the participant was at rest. Any abnormal ECG findings determined by the investigator to be clinically significant were reported as adverse events.

    Up to Week 54

  • Number Of Participants With TEAEs Related To Vital Signs (Hypotension)

    A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. Vital signs included office standing blood pressure, office sitting pulse rate, office standing pulse rate, and home sitting blood pressure. Any abnormal vital signs findings determined by the investigator to be clinically significant were reported as adverse events.

    Up to Week 54

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change From Baseline in Office Trough Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure

    Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12,16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 52, Week 54 (Follow-up), End-of-treatment (EOT) 1 (Up to Week 12), EOT 2 (Up to Week 52)

  • Change From Baseline in Office Trough Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12,16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 52, Week 54 (Follow-up), EOT 1 (Up to Week 12), EOT 2 (Up to Week 52)

  • Percentage Of Participants Who Achieve The Target Blood Pressure

    Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12,16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 52, Week 54 (Follow-up), EOT 1 (Up to Week 12), EOT 2 (Up to Week 52)

  • Observed Plasma Concentration for Azilsartan

    Predose and 2 hours postdose Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 2 hours postdose Week 16

  • Observed Plasma Concentration for Azilsartan Metabolites (M-I)

    Predose and 2 hours postdose Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 2 hours postdose Week 16

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Azilsartan 2.5 - 20 mg (Weight < 50 kg)

EXPERIMENTAL

Following a 2-week placebo run-in period, azilsartan 2.5 mg (titrated as needed to the highest dose of 20 mg) was administered orally once daily before or after breakfast, for the participants weighing \< 50 kg.

Drug: AzilsartanDrug: Placebo

Azilsartan 5 - 40 mg (Weight ≥ 50 kg)

EXPERIMENTAL

Following a 2-week placebo run-in period, azilsartan 5 mg (titrated as needed to the highest dose of 40 mg) was administered orally once daily before or after breakfast, for the participants weighing ≥ 50 kg.

Drug: AzilsartanDrug: Placebo

Interventions

Azilsartan granules and tablets

Also known as: TAK-536, AZILVA ®
Azilsartan 2.5 - 20 mg (Weight < 50 kg)Azilsartan 5 - 40 mg (Weight ≥ 50 kg)

Placebo-matching azilsartan granules and tablets

Azilsartan 2.5 - 20 mg (Weight < 50 kg)Azilsartan 5 - 40 mg (Weight ≥ 50 kg)

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • In the opinion of the investigator or subinvestigator, the participant's parent or the participant's legal guardian is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
  • The participant's parent or the participant's legal guardian is capable of signing and dating a written, informed consent form on behalf of the participant prior to the initiation of any study procedures. Written informed assent is also obtained from the participant as much as possible.
  • The Japanese participant who has a diagnosis of hypertension. A participant is eligible if he/she is deemed hypertensive according to the Reference Blood Pressure Values of Children by Gender and Age; office sitting diastolic or systolic blood pressure ≥ 95 percentile for essential hypertension without concomitant hypertensive organ damage, and ≥ 90 percentile for secondary hypertension with concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus, heart failure or any hypertensive organ damage.
  • In addition, participants need to meet the following criteria:
  • \- If currently treated with any antihypertensive drugs at the start of the Run-in Period: Participant has a documented historical diagnosis of hypertension and an office sitting diastolic or systolic blood pressure meeting the above criteria at the end of the Run-in Period (Week 0).
  • \- If currently untreated with any antihypertensive drugs at the start of the Run-in Period: Participant who meets the above criteria on 3 separate time points including screening and the end of the Run-in Period (Week 0). In addition, participant with essential hypertension without concomitant hypertensive organ damage still maintains hypertension with non-pharmacotherapy including foods or exercises for at least 3 months within 1 year prior to the start of screening.
  • The participant is male or female and aged 6 to less than 16 years at the time of informed consent.
  • The participant weighs at least 20 kg at screening.
  • The participant is capable of taking the tablets or granules supplied as the study drug.
  • A participant who has undergone kidney transplantation is eligible if he/she underwent the transplantation at least 6 months earlier at screening, and the graft has been functionally stable (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2) for at least 6 months with evidence (eg, Doppler echography, computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) excluding grafted kidney arterial stenosis. A participant on immunosuppressive therapy with a stable dose at least 30 days prior to screening is eligible.
  • A female participant of childbearing potential who is sexually active with a nonsterilized male partner agrees to use routinely adequate contraception from signing of informed consent through 1 month after the completion of the study, and proves negative in the pregnancy test at screening.
  • The participants judged by the investigator or subinvestigator that he/she can discontinue the therapy with renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) inhibitors for 2 weeks (acceptable range, 1 to 4 weeks) in safe prior to the Treatment Period.

You may not qualify if:

  • The participant has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to screening or is participating in another clinical study or a post-marketing clinical study.
  • Note: This does not apply to participants participating in observational studies without interventional or invasive therapy.
  • The participant previously received therapy with azilsartan. Note: This does not apply to participants participating in single dose pharmacokinetic studies of TAK-536.
  • The participant has poorly controlled hypertension indicated by an office sitting systolic blood pressure higher by at least 15 mmHg and/or an office sitting diastolic blood pressure higher by at least 10 mmHg than the 99 percentiles of the Reference Blood Pressure Values of Children by Gender and Age.
  • The participant has a diagnosis of malignant or accelerated hypertension.
  • The participant was noncompliant (\< 70% or \> 130%) with the study drug during the Run-in Period.
  • The participant has severe renal dysfunction (eGFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2), is receiving dialysis, has a renovascular disease affecting one or both kidneys, severe nephrotic syndrome not in remission, or a serum albumin level \< 2.5 g/dL.
  • The participant has a history of, or the signs/symptoms of serious cardiovascular, hepatobiliary, gastrointestinal, endocrine (eg, hyperthyroidism, Cushing's syndrome), hematological, immunological, urinogenital, psychiatric disease, cancer, or any other disease that adversely affects participant's health, or, in the opinion of the investigator or subinvestigator, potentially confounds the study results.
  • The participant has hemodynamically significant left ventricular outflow obstruction due to aortic stenosis or aortic valvular disease, or is scheduled to undergo a medical procedure affecting blood pressure during the study (eg, correction of arterial anomaly).
  • The participant has a history of or concurrent clinically significant abnormality of 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) that, in the opinion of the investigator or subinvestigator, disqualifies the participant for participation in the study.
  • The participant has poorly controlled diabetes mellitus indicated by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) \> 9.0% at screening.
  • The participant has an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level ≥ 2.5 × the upper limit of normal (ULN), or a total bilirubin level ≥ 1.5 × ULN at screening, severely impaired hepatic function, any active liver disease (regardless of the cause), or jaundice.
  • The participant has hyperkalemia exceeding ULN at screening.
  • The participant has a history of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection at screening.
  • The participant has a known hypersensitivity or allergy to any angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARBs).
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (30)

Unknown Facility

Nagakute, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Ōbu, Aichi-ken, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Nankoku, Kochi, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Shimajiri-gun, Okinawa, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Izumi, Osaka, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Ōsaka-sayama, Osaka, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Ōtsu, Shiga, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Fuchū, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Nerima-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Ōta-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Akita, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Chiba, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Fukuoka, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Fukushima, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Hiroshima, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Niigata, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Okayama, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Osaka, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Saitama, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Shizuoka, Japan

Location

Unknown Facility

Wakayama, Japan

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

azilsartan

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Director
Organization
Takeda

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2016

First Posted

June 6, 2016

Study Start

August 18, 2016

Primary Completion

June 4, 2019

Study Completion

June 4, 2019

Last Updated

February 7, 2020

Results First Posted

December 23, 2019

Record last verified: 2020-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available for all interventional studies after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received (or program is completely terminated), an opportunity for the primary publication of the research and final report development has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.

Locations