A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Comparative Study and a Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label, Long-term Study of SYR-472 (25 mg) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Complicated by Severe Renal Impairment or End-stage Renal Disease
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Comparative Study and a Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label, Long-term Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SYR-472 When Orally Administered at a Dose of 25 mg Once Weekly in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Complicated by Severe Renal Impairment or End-stage Renal Disease
3 other identifiers
interventional
107
1 country
49
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trelagliptin when administered at a dose of 25 mg once weekly using placebo as a control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease and inadequate glycemic control despite diet and/or exercise therapy (if given) or despite treatment with one antidiabetic drug in addition to diet and/or exercise therapy (if given); and to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of trelagliptin when administered at a dose of 25 mg once weekly to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 type-2-diabetes-mellitus
Started Aug 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_3 type-2-diabetes-mellitus
49 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 7, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 24, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 24, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 4, 2019
CompletedDecember 12, 2023
December 1, 2023
2.7 years
July 28, 2015
April 22, 2019
December 7, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change From Baseline in HbA1c at the End of Treatment Period I
Baseline (Week 0) and end of Treatment Period I (Up to Week 12)
Number of Participants Who Had One or More Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Before the Start of Study Drug Administration in Treatment Period II
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a drug (including the study drug). It does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment (including the study drug). An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug (including the study drug), whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. Reported data is the number of participants reporting one or more TEAEs that occurred before the start of Treatment Period II in each group.
Up to Week 12
Number of Participants Who Had One or More TEAE Occurred After 1st Dose of Trelagliptin 25 mg Tablet
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a drug (including the study drug). It does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment (including the study drug). An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug (including the study drug), whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. As to collect the safety data of long-term treatment with the active drug widely, the number of participants reporting one or more TEAEs that occurred after 1st dose of trelagliptin 25 mg, that is events in Period I and II for "Trelagliptin 25 mg" group and events in Period II for "Placebo and Trelagliptin 25 mg" group, was analyzed.
Up to Week 54
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Changes From Baseline in HbA1c
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 2, 4, 8, 12, and End of Treatment Period I (up to Week 12) and Period II (up to Week 52)
Number of Participants Achieving <6.0%, <7.0%, and <8.0% HbA1c at the End of Treatment Period I and Period II
At the end of Treatment Period I (Up to Week 12) and Period II (Up to Week 52)
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 2, 4, 8, 12, and End of Treatment Period I (up to Week 12) and Period II (up to Week 52)
Change From Baseline in Glycoalbumin
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 2, 4, 8, 12, and End of Treatment Period I (up to Week 12) and Period II (up to Week 52)
Numbers of Participants With TEAE Related to Vital Signs Before the Start of Study Drug Administration in Treatment Period II
Up to Week 12
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Trelagliptin 25 mg
EXPERIMENTALTrelagliptin 25 mg tablet, orally, once weekly before breakfast for up to Week 52 (Period I + II)
Placebo and Trelagliptin 25 mg
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo tablet, orally, once weekly before breakfast for up to Week 12 (Period I), followed by trelagliptin 25 mg tablet, orally, once weekly before breakfast for up to Week 52 (Period II)
Interventions
Trelagliptin 25 mg Tablets
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The participant has a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- The participant has a fasting C-peptide value of 0.6 ng/mL or higher at the start of the screening period (Week -6) and Week -2 of the screening period.
- The participant has a hemoglobin value of 10.0 g/dL or higher at the start of the screening period (Week -6) and Week -2 of the screening period.
- The participant has a Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) value of 7.0% or higher but less than 10.0% at Week -2 of the screening period. For participants undergoing hemodialysis (with End-stage Renal Disease \[ESRD\]), those with a glycoalbumin value of 20% or higher could be enrolled even if their HbA1c value is below 7.0% at Week -2 of the screening period.
- \<HbA1c value of 7.0% or higher but less than 10.0% at Week -2 of the screening period\> The participant has an HbA1c value difference between the start of the screening period (Week -6) and Week -2 of the screening period within 10.0%\* of the HbA1c value at the start of the screening period (Week -6).
- \<For participants undergoing hemodialysis (with ESRD), glycoalbumin value of 20% or higher and HbA1c value of below 7.0% at Week -2 of the screening period\> The participant has a glycoalbumin difference between the start of the screening period (Week -6) and Week -2 of the screening period within 10.0%\* of the glycoalbumin value at the start of the screening period (Week -6).
- \*: rounded to one decimal place
- The participant has been on a fixed diet and/or exercise therapy (if any) for at least 6 weeks prior to the start of the screening period (Week -6).
- The participant meets any of the following:
- The participant has not received any antidiabetic medications (including insulin preparations) from at least 6 weeks prior to the start of the screening period (Week -6).
- The participant is being treated with one oral hypoglycemic drug\* starting from at least 6 weeks prior to the start of the screening period (Week -6) at a fixed dose and regimen.
- \*: any one of the following medications: mitiglinide calcium hydrate, repaglinide, acarbose, miglitol, or voglibose
- The participant is being treated with one insulin preparation\*\* starting from at least 6 weeks prior to the start of the screening period (Week -6) at a fixed dose and regimen (≤40 units/day) of the insulin preparation.
- Any one of the following insulin monotherapies: mixed (short-acting or rapid-acting insulin containing no more than 30% volume), intermediate-acting, or long-acting soluble insulin preparations
- The participant is not undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis and has severe renal impairment \[creatinine clearance (Ccr) \<30 mL/min at the start of the screening period (Week -6)\], or the participant is undergoing hemodialysis and has end-stage renal failure.
- +6 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- The participant has clinically evident hepatic impairment \[e.g., aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≥2.5 times the upper limit of normal or total bilirubin of ≥2.0 mg/dL at the start of the screening period (Week -6) or at Week -2 of the screening period\].
- The participant has any serious cardiac diseases, cerebrovascular disorders, or serious pancreatic or hematological diseases (e.g., participants who require inpatient treatment or are hospitalized for treatment within 24 weeks prior to the start of the screening period).
- The participant has severe ketosis, diabetic coma or precoma, type 1 diabetes, severe infection, before or after surgery, or severe external trauma.
- The participant has hemoglobinopathy (sickle cell disease, thalassemia, etc.).
- The participant experienced hypoglycemia (participants with a blood glucose value of ≤70 mg/dL or hypoglycemic symptoms) within 6 weeks prior to the start of the screening period or during the screening period (at least twice per week).
- The participant has inadequately controlled hypertension.
- For participants who are being treated with one antidiabetic agent, the participant was using at least two antidiabetic therapies on the day before 6 weeks prior to the start of the screening period (Week -6) (43 days prior to the start of the screening period).
- The participant has malignancies.
- The participant has a history of hypersensitivity or allergies to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors.
- The participant has a history of gastrectomy or small intestinal resection.
- The participant is a habitual drinker and consumes a daily average of more than 100 mL of alcohol.
- The participant has a history of drug abuse (defined as the use of an illegal drug) or alcohol dependence.
- The participant is required to take excluded medications during the study period.
- The participant has previously received trelagliptin.
- The participant received any other investigational products (including study drugs in a post-marketing clinical study) within 12 weeks prior to the start of the screening period.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
Study Sites (49)
Unknown Facility
Anjo, Aichi-ken, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kasukabe, Aichi-ken, Japan
Unknown Facility
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
Unknown Facility
Toyohashi, Aichi-ken, Japan
Unknown Facility
Yatomi, Aichi-ken, Japan
Unknown Facility
Asahi, Chiba, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kisarazu, Chiba, Japan
Unknown Facility
Yotsukaidō, Chiba, Japan
Unknown Facility
Imabari, Ehime, Japan
Unknown Facility
Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
Unknown Facility
Niihama, Ehime, Japan
Unknown Facility
Chikushino-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kasuga, Fukuoka, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kasuya-gun, Fukuoka, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
Unknown Facility
Munakata, Fukuoka, Japan
Unknown Facility
Tajimi, Gifu, Japan
Unknown Facility
Takasaki, Gunma, Japan
Unknown Facility
Fukuyama, Hiroshima, Japan
Unknown Facility
Chitose, Hokkaido, Japan
Unknown Facility
Himeji, Hyōgo, Japan
Unknown Facility
Takarazuka, Hyōgo, Japan
Unknown Facility
Mito, Ibaragi, Japan
Unknown Facility
Sakai, Ibaragi, Japan
Unknown Facility
Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
Unknown Facility
Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
Unknown Facility
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
Unknown Facility
Nakano, Nagano, Japan
Unknown Facility
Ueda, Nagano, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kasaoka, Okayama-ken, Japan
Unknown Facility
Setouchi, Okayama-ken, Japan
Unknown Facility
Fukaya, Saitama, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kumagaya, Saitama, Japan
Unknown Facility
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
Unknown Facility
Yoshinogawa, Tokushima, Japan
Unknown Facility
Hachiōji, Tokyo, Japan
Unknown Facility
Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kunitachi, Tokyo, Japan
Unknown Facility
Uozu, Toyama, Japan
Unknown Facility
Shimonoseki, Yamaguchi, Japan
Unknown Facility
Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
Unknown Facility
Akita, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kumamoto, Japan
Unknown Facility
Nagano, Japan
Unknown Facility
Niigata, Japan
Unknown Facility
Osaka, Japan
Unknown Facility
Yamagata, Japan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director
- Organization
- Takeda (Note: This product was divested to Teijin Pharma Limited in 2023)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Study Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2015
First Posted
July 30, 2015
Study Start
August 7, 2015
Primary Completion
April 24, 2018
Study Completion
April 24, 2018
Last Updated
December 12, 2023
Results First Posted
November 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available for all interventional studies after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received (or program is completely terminated), an opportunity for the primary publication of the research and final report development has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.