Moyo; strap-on Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring in a Rural Setting
Evaluation of an Innovative Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Device (Named Moyo) to Improve Perinatal Outcome at Haydom Hospital, Tanzania
1 other identifier
interventional
2,652
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Annually, an estimated 2.6 million still births occur half of which die during labor and delivery (fresh stillbirths). In addition, around 750,000 newborns die shortly after birth due to intrapartum-related hypoxia or birth asphyxia. Almost 99% of these perinatal deaths take place in low-income countries where the provider/patient ratio is low and fetal monitoring is inadequate. Poor intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring, failure to identify fetal distress, and subsequently intervene, is a common pathway to perinatal deaths in these low-resourced settings. Recently, an innovative fetal heart rate monitoring device, called Moyo, using ultrasound technology, was developed to be strapped on the mother during labour. This project will compare the effectiveness of automatic use of Moyo versus intermittent use of hand-held fetoscope in detection of abnormal fetal heart rate, through a randomized control study, at Haydom Hospital, Tanzania.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedMay 23, 2017
May 1, 2017
1.1 years
June 1, 2016
May 19, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Frequency of abnormal fetal heart rate detection
Up to delivery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Mode of delivery: vaginal versus operative
Up to delivery
Neonatal outcome: dead versus alive
Up to 24 hours
Time from abnormal fetal heart rate detection to delivery in minutes
Up to delivery
Study Arms (2)
Moyo strap-on
EXPERIMENTALContinous fetal heart rate monitoring
Hand-held fetoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntermittent fetal heart rate monitoring
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women admitted in labor
You may not qualify if:
- Women scheduled for elective cesarean section, women with abnormal fetal heart rate on admission, multiples, and critically ill patients with no measurements of fetal heart rate on admission
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Research Institute
Haydom, Manyara Region, 9041, Tanzania
Related Publications (1)
Mdoe PF, Ersdal HL, Mduma E, Moshiro R, Dalen I, Perlman JM, Kidanto H. Randomized controlled trial of continuous Doppler versus intermittent fetoscope fetal heart rate monitoring in a low-resource setting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Dec;143(3):344-350. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12648. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
PMID: 30120775DERIVED
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hege L. Ersdal, Md PhD
Helse Stavanger HF
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2016
First Posted
June 6, 2016
Study Start
February 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 23, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share