Study Stopped
Lack of funding
Registry for Cardiogenic Shock: Utility and Efficacy of Device Therapy
RESCUE
1 other identifier
observational
1,089
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to gather information on patients who have heart failure and are eligible for one of the following two procedures: 1) mechanical support, i.e. ventricular assist device (VAD) or 2) heart transplant. the study seeks to determine which patient populations benefit from heart transplant or ventricular assist device. This will allow to offer the state-of-the-art care to the patients in heart failure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2013
Longer than P75 for all trials
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 11, 2020
CompletedApril 13, 2023
April 1, 2023
6.3 years
May 31, 2016
April 11, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
1-year survival post mechanical circulatory assist device implant
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
survival to discharge post mechanical circulatory assist device implant
until the enrolled patient is discharged. Expected to occur within 90 days of enrollment.
30-day survival post mechanical circulatory assist device implant
30 days
Number of adverse events during mechanical circulatory assist device support
up to 30-days of weaning from the device.
Eligibility Criteria
Potential subjects include all adult patients who underwent evaluation for MCS for cardiogenic shock. Each adult patient who receives an MCSD at an institution will be screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria listed below.
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients who receive any MCSD including Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA ECMO), surgical VAD, and percutaneous VAD, used to treat CS on or after 9/30/10. Intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) is not considered an MCSD in this Registry.
- Adult patients who have signed informed consent. For patients who are too ill to give informed consent the health care proxy of the patient or next of kin will be approached for the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- patients younger than 18 years of age.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
University of Colarodo
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Minneapolis Heart Institute
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Newark Beth Israel Medical center
Newark, New Jersey, 07112, United States
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Westchester Medical Center
Valhalla, New York, 10595, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Publications (5)
Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Sanborn TA, White HD, Talley JD, Buller CE, Jacobs AK, Slater JN, Col J, McKinlay SM, LeJemtel TH. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):625-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410901.
PMID: 10460813BACKGROUNDThiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, Ferenc M, Olbrich HG, Hausleiter J, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Fuhrmann J, Bohm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Schuler G, Werdan K; IABP-SHOCK II Trial Investigators. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 4;367(14):1287-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208410. Epub 2012 Aug 26.
PMID: 22920912BACKGROUNDKirklin JK, Naftel DC, Kormos RL, Stevenson LW, Pagani FD, Miller MA, Baldwin JT, Young JB. Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Feb;32(2):141-56. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.12.004.
PMID: 23352390BACKGROUNDKirklin JK, Naftel DC, Pagani FD, Kormos RL, Stevenson L, Miller M, Young JB. Long-term mechanical circulatory support (destination therapy): on track to compete with heart transplantation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;144(3):584-603; discussion 597-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.044. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
PMID: 22795459BACKGROUNDO'Connor CM, Rogers JG. Evidence for overturning the guidelines in cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 4;367(14):1349-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1209601. Epub 2012 Aug 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 22920913BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hiroo Takayama, MD, PhD
Columbia University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Target Duration
- 12 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2016
First Posted
June 3, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 11, 2020
Study Completion
February 11, 2020
Last Updated
April 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share