NCT02786316

Brief Summary

Low back pain is a common disorder, occurring worldwide in both males and females in all age groups1. The prevalence is higher in females and the incidence peaks between 30 and 65 years. It is currently the most frequent musculoskeletal cause of functional disability and it has a major socio-economic impact on today's society. Although a small percentage of persons with low back pain can be diagnosed with a specific underlying cause, almost 90% of persons with low back pain present with symptoms of nonspecific origin. A part of these symptoms are only of short duration, but 23% of all people will develop nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). Exercise therapy (ET) is currently an important component in the treatment of NSCLBP. Previous studies analysed the effects of various modes of exercise therapy, such as motor control therapy, core stability training and aerobic conditioning training. However, therapy outcomes can be low, and guidelines in favour of using a specific program are contradictory. It thus still remains unclear which therapy modality is best suited. Furthermore, no recommendations are available about optimal training intensities during rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP. Since as well aerobic as muscular deconditioning are apparent in persons with chronic low back pain and improvements in overall physical fitness can affect therapy outcomes in this population, ET specifically focussing on physical fitness can be advocated for NSCLBP rehabilitation. High Intensity Training (HIT), has been promoted as an effective and efficient training method for improving physical fitness and health related parameters in healthy persons. Also, HIT resulted in successful reconditioning and improvement of functional and disease related outcomes in persons with other chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, heart failure, COPD and cardiometabolic diseases. Although some studies showed promising results for the effect of HIT on low back pain such as high intensity isolated, evidence is still scarce and study results are unclear because of methodological shortcomings.To evaluate HIT for the rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP, a therapy program was developed consisting of high intensity interval cardio and high load whole body strength training. The aim of this pilot study is 1) to evaluate the feasibility of a HIT program for the rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP, and 2) to evaluate the effects of a HIT program on disease related outcomes and physical fitness compared to a conventional rehabilitation program in persons with NSCLBP.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable low-back-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2015

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 19, 2016

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2016

Status Verified

September 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

May 19, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 16, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (14)

  • Pain

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) The NPRS is a nominal scale on which the participant indicates the amount of pain he/she perceives at that current moment. It consists of a line indicating eleven successive scores (0-10), whereby score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'worst pain imaginable'. An improvement of 2 levels or more is accepted as clinically relevant

    day 1

  • Pain

    Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) The NPRS is a nominal scale on which the participant indicates the amount of pain he/she perceives at that current moment. It consists of a line indicating eleven successive scores (0-10), whereby score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'worst pain imaginable'. An improvement of 2 levels or more is accepted as clinically relevant

    week 6

  • Kinesiophobia

    Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) The TSK is an ordinal 17 item questionnaire that inventories pain-related fear of movement for persons with subacute and chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia41,42. A higher score relates to more pain-related fear.

    day 1

  • Kinesiophobia

    Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) The TSK is an ordinal 17 item questionnaire that inventories pain-related fear of movement for persons with subacute and chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia41,42. A higher score relates to more pain-related fear.

    week 6

  • physical disability

    Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) The RMDQ is an ordinal 24 item questionnaire for evaluating the disability level of the patient with low back pain with regards to activities of daily living33,35. A higher score correlates to a higher level of disability and a change of 5 is the minimal clinically important difference36

    day 1

  • physical disability

    Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) The RMDQ is an ordinal 24 item questionnaire for evaluating the disability level of the patient with low back pain with regards to activities of daily living33,35. A higher score correlates to a higher level of disability and a change of 5 is the minimal clinically important difference36

    week 6

  • Endurance capacity

    Endurance capacity test Endurance capacity is tested to volitional fatigue on an electronically braked bike ergometer (eBike Basic, General Electric GmbH, Bitz, Germany).

    day 1

  • Endurance capacity

    Endurance capacity test Endurance capacity is tested to volitional fatigue on an electronically braked bike ergometer (eBike Basic, General Electric GmbH, Bitz, Germany).

    week 6

  • Body composition

    Measured by Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)

    day 1

  • Body composition

    Measured by Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)

    week 6

  • weight

    day 1

  • Weight

    week 6

  • BMI (Body Mass Index)

    day 1

  • BMI (Body Mass Index)

    week 6

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • physical activity

    day 1

  • physical activity

    week 6

  • disability in participation and quality of life

    day 1

  • disability in participation and quality of life

    week 6

  • Questionaire motivation and Therapy Adherence

    day 1

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

Hit program for the rehabilitation of persons with nonspecific chronic low backpain

Other: HIT program

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

a conventional rehabilitation program for persons with nonspecific chronic low backpain

Other: conventional rehabilitation program

Interventions

HIT program for the rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP

intervention group

a conventional rehabilitation program in persons with NSCLBP

Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • medically diagnosed with non-specific chronic low back pain4,
  • over 18 years old,
  • able to understand Dutch (spoken and written).

You may not qualify if:

  • invasive surgery at the lumbar spine in the last 18 months (arthrodesis was excluded, microsurgery was allowed),
  • radiculopathy (uni- or bilateral),
  • co-morbidities: paresis and/or sensory disturbances by neurological causes, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, an increase of pain of 3 points with a result of \> 8/10 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in the last 48 hours, pregnancy,
  • ongoing compensation claims and/or (work)disability \> 6 months,
  • rehabilitation/exercise therapy program for LBP in the past 6 months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Jessa Ziekenhuis

Hasselt, 3500, Belgium

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Jonas Verbrugghe, prof. dr.

    Hasselt University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
prof. dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2016

First Posted

June 1, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 1, 2016

Study Completion

August 1, 2016

Last Updated

September 19, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations