High Intensity Training With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
LBP-HIT
High Intensity Training in Patients With Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Pilot Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Low back pain is a common disorder, occurring worldwide in both males and females in all age groups1. The prevalence is higher in females and the incidence peaks between 30 and 65 years. It is currently the most frequent musculoskeletal cause of functional disability and it has a major socio-economic impact on today's society. Although a small percentage of persons with low back pain can be diagnosed with a specific underlying cause, almost 90% of persons with low back pain present with symptoms of nonspecific origin. A part of these symptoms are only of short duration, but 23% of all people will develop nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). Exercise therapy (ET) is currently an important component in the treatment of NSCLBP. Previous studies analysed the effects of various modes of exercise therapy, such as motor control therapy, core stability training and aerobic conditioning training. However, therapy outcomes can be low, and guidelines in favour of using a specific program are contradictory. It thus still remains unclear which therapy modality is best suited. Furthermore, no recommendations are available about optimal training intensities during rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP. Since as well aerobic as muscular deconditioning are apparent in persons with chronic low back pain and improvements in overall physical fitness can affect therapy outcomes in this population, ET specifically focussing on physical fitness can be advocated for NSCLBP rehabilitation. High Intensity Training (HIT), has been promoted as an effective and efficient training method for improving physical fitness and health related parameters in healthy persons. Also, HIT resulted in successful reconditioning and improvement of functional and disease related outcomes in persons with other chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, heart failure, COPD and cardiometabolic diseases. Although some studies showed promising results for the effect of HIT on low back pain such as high intensity isolated, evidence is still scarce and study results are unclear because of methodological shortcomings.To evaluate HIT for the rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP, a therapy program was developed consisting of high intensity interval cardio and high load whole body strength training. The aim of this pilot study is 1) to evaluate the feasibility of a HIT program for the rehabilitation of persons with NSCLBP, and 2) to evaluate the effects of a HIT program on disease related outcomes and physical fitness compared to a conventional rehabilitation program in persons with NSCLBP.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Jan 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 19, 2016
September 1, 2016
1.4 years
May 19, 2016
September 16, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Pain
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) The NPRS is a nominal scale on which the participant indicates the amount of pain he/she perceives at that current moment. It consists of a line indicating eleven successive scores (0-10), whereby score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'worst pain imaginable'. An improvement of 2 levels or more is accepted as clinically relevant
day 1
Pain
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) The NPRS is a nominal scale on which the participant indicates the amount of pain he/she perceives at that current moment. It consists of a line indicating eleven successive scores (0-10), whereby score 0 means 'no pain' and score 10 means 'worst pain imaginable'. An improvement of 2 levels or more is accepted as clinically relevant
week 6
Kinesiophobia
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) The TSK is an ordinal 17 item questionnaire that inventories pain-related fear of movement for persons with subacute and chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia41,42. A higher score relates to more pain-related fear.
day 1
Kinesiophobia
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) The TSK is an ordinal 17 item questionnaire that inventories pain-related fear of movement for persons with subacute and chronic low back pain or fibromyalgia41,42. A higher score relates to more pain-related fear.
week 6
physical disability
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) The RMDQ is an ordinal 24 item questionnaire for evaluating the disability level of the patient with low back pain with regards to activities of daily living33,35. A higher score correlates to a higher level of disability and a change of 5 is the minimal clinically important difference36
day 1
physical disability
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) The RMDQ is an ordinal 24 item questionnaire for evaluating the disability level of the patient with low back pain with regards to activities of daily living33,35. A higher score correlates to a higher level of disability and a change of 5 is the minimal clinically important difference36
week 6
Endurance capacity
Endurance capacity test Endurance capacity is tested to volitional fatigue on an electronically braked bike ergometer (eBike Basic, General Electric GmbH, Bitz, Germany).
day 1
Endurance capacity
Endurance capacity test Endurance capacity is tested to volitional fatigue on an electronically braked bike ergometer (eBike Basic, General Electric GmbH, Bitz, Germany).
week 6
Body composition
Measured by Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)
day 1
Body composition
Measured by Dual Energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)
week 6
weight
day 1
Weight
week 6
BMI (Body Mass Index)
day 1
BMI (Body Mass Index)
week 6
Secondary Outcomes (6)
physical activity
day 1
physical activity
week 6
disability in participation and quality of life
day 1
disability in participation and quality of life
week 6
Questionaire motivation and Therapy Adherence
day 1
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
intervention group
EXPERIMENTALHit program for the rehabilitation of persons with nonspecific chronic low backpain
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORa conventional rehabilitation program for persons with nonspecific chronic low backpain
Interventions
a conventional rehabilitation program in persons with NSCLBP
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- medically diagnosed with non-specific chronic low back pain4,
- over 18 years old,
- able to understand Dutch (spoken and written).
You may not qualify if:
- invasive surgery at the lumbar spine in the last 18 months (arthrodesis was excluded, microsurgery was allowed),
- radiculopathy (uni- or bilateral),
- co-morbidities: paresis and/or sensory disturbances by neurological causes, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, an increase of pain of 3 points with a result of \> 8/10 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in the last 48 hours, pregnancy,
- ongoing compensation claims and/or (work)disability \> 6 months,
- rehabilitation/exercise therapy program for LBP in the past 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hasselt Universitylead
- Jessa Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Jessa Ziekenhuis
Hasselt, 3500, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jonas Verbrugghe, prof. dr.
Hasselt University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- prof. dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2016
First Posted
June 1, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
September 19, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share