Immediate Effects of a Spinal Lumbar Manipulation
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Non-specific low back pain is defined as a pain with no specific vertebral-related cause, such as infectious disease, tumor, osteoporosis, fracture, structural abnormality, inflammatory disease, radicular compressive syndrome or cauda equine syndrome. Non-specific low back pain is a common disease in many countries. This musculoskeletal disorder is costly to public health systems. Therefore, the use of manual therapies is important in the treatment of this disease and studies show the effectiveness of this type of therapy. Spinal manipulation is applied in manual therapies such as Osteopathy, Chiropractic and Physical Therapy and is widely used for acute and chronic non-specific low-back pain. There is moderate evidence that spinal manipulation is superior to sham spinal manipulation for improving short-term pain and function in chronic and acute non-specific low back pain. However the therapeutic mechanisms involved in this procedure are not well understood. Furthermore, while the high velocity and low amplitude spinal therapy has been shown to be effective in reducing pain and improving functional capacity in subjects with non-specific low back pain, the effect on postural variables have not been investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the acute effect of lumbar manipulation on pain and postural variables. Twenty-four individuals with non-specific low back pain will be randomly allocated to two groups. The intervention group will receive high velocity and low amplitude spinal therapy, while the control group will receive sham manipulation. Immediately before and after the respective manipulation protocol, both groups will be evaluated regarding pain level, using a visual-analogue scale and algometer, and postural variables, using center of pressure displacement measured with the aid of a force plate. While the patient and therapist manipulator will be aware of the protocol applied in each case, the evaluator will be blind. A statistical treatment will be used to compare the results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Jan 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedMay 22, 2015
May 1, 2015
2 months
November 28, 2014
May 21, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pressure pain threshold assessment (algometer)
An algometer will used to assess the pressure pain threshold at baseline and following the intervention
Within one day
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Clinical Prediction Rule
Within one day
Center of pressure displacement
Within one day
Subjective pain assessment
Within one day
Study Arms (2)
HVLA Manipulation
EXPERIMENTALIntervention Group who receives a high velocity and low amplitude (HVLA) lumbar manipulation. A manual procedure also known as high velocity and low amplitude lumbar spinal manipulation is delivered to the subjects in the side lying position. The more restricted lumbar segment (mobility restriction) will be the target region for the manipulative procedure.
Sham Manipulation
NO INTERVENTIONControl Group who receives a simulated manipulation.
Interventions
Intervention Group who receives a high velocity and low amplitude (HVLA) lumbar manipulation. A manual procedure also known as high velocity and low amplitude lumbar spinal manipulation are delivered for the subjects in the side lying position. The lumbar segment more restrict (mobility restriction) will be the target region for the manipulative procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- recurrent low back pain in the last three months;
- medical diagnosis of non-specific low back pain, daily or almost daily;
- subjects that will present at least four variables which encompass the clinical prediction rule: symptoms duration less than 16 days, Fear Avoidance-Beliefs Questionnaire score lower than 19 in the work subscale, segmental lumbar hypermobility test in prone decubitus, internal hip rotation higher than 35 degrees and symptoms that don't pass the knee.
You may not qualify if:
- subjects presenting symptoms that pass the knee;
- impairment of neurologic signs like sensibility, muscle force and deep tendon reflex;
- a prior history of spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, inflammatory disease, cancer, musculoskeletal degenerative disease, pregnancy, disease and drugs that impairment the balance;
- subjects who received a HVLA manipulation of the lumbar spine at least three months earlier;
- will be excluded women older than 50 years, that don't will present a bone mineral density exam.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90690-200, Brazil
Related Publications (1)
Fagundes Loss J, de Souza da Silva L, Ferreira Miranda I, Groisman S, Santiago Wagner Neto E, Souza C, Tarrago Candotti C. Immediate effects of a lumbar spine manipulation on pain sensitivity and postural control in individuals with nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Jun 3;28(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-00316-7.
PMID: 32487243DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jefferson F Loss, Phd
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2014
First Posted
December 9, 2014
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 22, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-05