Prompting Activity in a Workplace Setting
PAWS
A Study to Assess the Impact of a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Prolonged Sitting in the Workplace
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This dual-arm randomised study aims to test a multi-component intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in a cohort of desk-based office workers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedFebruary 27, 2017
February 1, 2017
7 months
May 25, 2016
February 24, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total time spent sitting at work
Total time spent sitting at work will be objectively measured using a tri-axial accelerometer
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Total time spent sitting at work in continuous bouts of at least 30 minutes.
12 weeks
Number of sitting events at work
12 weeks
Number of prolonged sitting events at work
12 weeks
Time after prompt to stand
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Prompt group
EXPERIMENTALFollowing feedback on their baseline sitting behaviour and an education session on the health benefits of breaking prolonged sitting, the prompt group will receive hourly prompts on their PC to stand. The prompts will be delivered via Microsoft Outlook and will run for a period of 10 weeks. The messages will be short in length, varied and centre around the key message of breaking prolonged sitting by standing
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will receive the same education session as the prompt group, as well as feedback on their baseline sitting behaviour. However, the will not receive prompts on their PC.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Over 18 years of age
- Primarily engaged in sedentary, computer-based activities
- Access to Microsoft Outlook calendar
You may not qualify if:
- Workstation comprises of a standing desk
- Pre-existing health condition that prevents standing on a regular basis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Glasgow Caledonian University
Glasgow, G4 0BA, United Kingdom
Related Publications (14)
Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown WJ, Matthews CE, Bauman AE, van der Ploeg HP. Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e80000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080000. eCollection 2013.
PMID: 24236168BACKGROUNDHealy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):661-6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2046. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
PMID: 18252901BACKGROUNDOwen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010 Jul;38(3):105-13. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2.
PMID: 20577058BACKGROUNDParry S, Straker L, Gilson ND, Smith AJ. Participatory workplace interventions can reduce sedentary time for office workers--a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e78957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078957. eCollection 2013.
PMID: 24265734BACKGROUNDHealy GN, Lawler S, Thorp A, Neuhaus M, Robson E, Owen N, et al. Reducing prolonged sitting in the workplace. An evidence review: full report. 2012;ISBN:978-1-921822-06-3.
BACKGROUNDEvans RE, Fawole HO, Sheriff SA, Dall PM, Grant PM, Ryan CG. Point-of-choice prompts to reduce sitting time at work: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.010.
PMID: 22898122BACKGROUNDCraig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
PMID: 18824488BACKGROUNDBandura A, 1925. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control / Albert Bandura. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
BACKGROUNDGardner B, Smith L, Lorencatto F, Hamer M, Biddle SJ. How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):89-112. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1082146. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
PMID: 26315814BACKGROUNDNeuhaus M, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Owen N, Eakin EG. Workplace sitting and height-adjustable workstations: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.09.009.
PMID: 24355669BACKGROUNDHealy GN, Eakin EG, Lamontagne AD, Owen N, Winkler EA, Wiesner G, Gunning L, Neuhaus M, Lawler S, Fjeldsoe BS, Dunstan DW. Reducing sitting time in office workers: short-term efficacy of a multicomponent intervention. Prev Med. 2013 Jul;57(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
PMID: 23597658BACKGROUNDProchaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390-5. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. No abstract available.
PMID: 6863699BACKGROUNDCooley D, Pedersen S. A pilot study of increasing nonpurposeful movement breaks at work as a means of reducing prolonged sitting. J Environ Public Health. 2013;2013:128376. doi: 10.1155/2013/128376. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
PMID: 23690798BACKGROUNDGrant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, Granat MH. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med. 2006 Dec;40(12):992-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.030262. Epub 2006 Sep 15.
PMID: 16980531BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Philippa Dall, PhD
Senior Research Fellow
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2016
First Posted
May 30, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share