NCT02785640

Brief Summary

This dual-arm randomised study aims to test a multi-component intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in a cohort of desk-based office workers.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 25, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 30, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

February 27, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

May 25, 2016

Last Update Submit

February 24, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Total time spent sitting at work

    Total time spent sitting at work will be objectively measured using a tri-axial accelerometer

    12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Total time spent sitting at work in continuous bouts of at least 30 minutes.

    12 weeks

  • Number of sitting events at work

    12 weeks

  • Number of prolonged sitting events at work

    12 weeks

  • Time after prompt to stand

    12 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Prompt group

EXPERIMENTAL

Following feedback on their baseline sitting behaviour and an education session on the health benefits of breaking prolonged sitting, the prompt group will receive hourly prompts on their PC to stand. The prompts will be delivered via Microsoft Outlook and will run for a period of 10 weeks. The messages will be short in length, varied and centre around the key message of breaking prolonged sitting by standing

Behavioral: Hourly prompts to stand delivered by Microsoft Outlook

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

The control group will receive the same education session as the prompt group, as well as feedback on their baseline sitting behaviour. However, the will not receive prompts on their PC.

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Over 18 years of age
  • Primarily engaged in sedentary, computer-based activities
  • Access to Microsoft Outlook calendar

You may not qualify if:

  • Workstation comprises of a standing desk
  • Pre-existing health condition that prevents standing on a regular basis.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Glasgow Caledonian University

Glasgow, G4 0BA, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown WJ, Matthews CE, Bauman AE, van der Ploeg HP. Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e80000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080000. eCollection 2013.

    PMID: 24236168BACKGROUND
  • Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Cerin E, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2008 Apr;31(4):661-6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2046. Epub 2008 Feb 5.

    PMID: 18252901BACKGROUND
  • Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010 Jul;38(3):105-13. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2.

    PMID: 20577058BACKGROUND
  • Parry S, Straker L, Gilson ND, Smith AJ. Participatory workplace interventions can reduce sedentary time for office workers--a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e78957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078957. eCollection 2013.

    PMID: 24265734BACKGROUND
  • Healy GN, Lawler S, Thorp A, Neuhaus M, Robson E, Owen N, et al. Reducing prolonged sitting in the workplace. An evidence review: full report. 2012;ISBN:978-1-921822-06-3.

    BACKGROUND
  • Evans RE, Fawole HO, Sheriff SA, Dall PM, Grant PM, Ryan CG. Point-of-choice prompts to reduce sitting time at work: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.010.

    PMID: 22898122BACKGROUND
  • Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.

    PMID: 18824488BACKGROUND
  • Bandura A, 1925. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control / Albert Bandura. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gardner B, Smith L, Lorencatto F, Hamer M, Biddle SJ. How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):89-112. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1082146. Epub 2015 Sep 16.

    PMID: 26315814BACKGROUND
  • Neuhaus M, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Owen N, Eakin EG. Workplace sitting and height-adjustable workstations: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.09.009.

    PMID: 24355669BACKGROUND
  • Healy GN, Eakin EG, Lamontagne AD, Owen N, Winkler EA, Wiesner G, Gunning L, Neuhaus M, Lawler S, Fjeldsoe BS, Dunstan DW. Reducing sitting time in office workers: short-term efficacy of a multicomponent intervention. Prev Med. 2013 Jul;57(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

    PMID: 23597658BACKGROUND
  • Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983 Jun;51(3):390-5. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6863699BACKGROUND
  • Cooley D, Pedersen S. A pilot study of increasing nonpurposeful movement breaks at work as a means of reducing prolonged sitting. J Environ Public Health. 2013;2013:128376. doi: 10.1155/2013/128376. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

    PMID: 23690798BACKGROUND
  • Grant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, Granat MH. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med. 2006 Dec;40(12):992-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.030262. Epub 2006 Sep 15.

    PMID: 16980531BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sedentary Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Officials

  • Philippa Dall, PhD

    Senior Research Fellow

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2016

First Posted

May 30, 2016

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion

October 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

February 27, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations