Study Stopped
Changes of the standard adjuvant treatment which does not allow an iterative PICC placement
Iterative PICC Placement Versus Long Term Device
PICC One Day
A Randomized, Multicentre, Comparative Phase III Study of Catheter-related Complications of an Iterative PICC Placement vs a Long-term PAC in Patients With Breast Cancer
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) and port-a-cath (PAC) are the most commonly medical devices used for the administration of chemotherapy. Placement of these devices via central venous access is sometimes responsible for complications. The incidence of these complications is correlated with the device holding time. A strategy of iterative PICC placement could significantly reduce these complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jan 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 27, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 10, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 10, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2018
CompletedFebruary 5, 2018
February 1, 2018
Same day
May 19, 2016
February 2, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare complication rate for iterative placement (PICC) versus long term placement (PAC).
Complication rate will be defined by the proportion of patients with at least one of the following complications from the date of randomization to the end of the study: pneumothorax , hemothorax ,veinous thrombosis, migration or expulsion of the device, fissure or rupture of the catheter, catheter obstruction, extravasation.
6 months after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Success rate for each strategy
6 months after randomization
Description of failure causes for each strategy
6 months after randomization
Level of pain for each strategy
At Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1
Quality of Life in both arms
At Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1
Study Arms (2)
Iterative PICC placement
EXPERIMENTALNew PICC placement at each chemotherapy cycle (removed after treatment administration)
Long term implantable device
ACTIVE COMPARATORPort-a-cath inserted prio first chemotherapy cycle and maintained throughout the study
Interventions
Intervention is the catheterisation strategy (not the device)
Intervention is the catheterisation strategy (not the device)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women older than 18 years old;
- Breast cancer diagnosis histologically proven , for any histological subtypes;
- or 6 indication of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy; according to hormonal status and HER2 of the tumors, the patient may be treated concomitantly with hormone therapy and / or trastuzumab; Nota Bene: treatment protocol adopted will imperatively be administered in 3-week cycles.
- Central venous access indication;
- Ability to understand and willingness to comply with the study monitoring;
- Affiliated to the French social security system;
You may not qualify if:
- Any contraindication for placement of a central venous catheter ( hemostasis disorders , active infection treated with antibiotics , ...);
- Patient who can't stop anti -vitamin K treatment ( AVK ) ( a relay by Heparin Low Molecular Weight (LMWH) is possible);
- History of central access, regardless of the indication;
- Any active disease other than cancer pathology , requiring repeated administration of intravenous therapy ;
- Patient deprived of liberty;
- Not monitoring for social, geographical, psychological or family reason.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre Leon Berardlead
- Ministry of Health, Francecollaborator
- C. R. Bardcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Julien GAUTIER
Lyon, 69008, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hervé ROSAY, MD
Centre Leon Berard
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2016
First Posted
May 27, 2016
Study Start
January 10, 2018
Primary Completion
January 10, 2018
Study Completion
January 10, 2018
Last Updated
February 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share