Evaluation of Homeopathic Treatment for Hot Flashes in Non Metastatic Breast Cancer
HBC
Placebo-controlled Evaluation of the Homeopathic Drug BRN01 for the Treatment of Hot Flashes in Women With Non Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated by Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
138
1 country
9
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a homeopathic treatment (BRN01) in reducing hot flash scores after 4 weeks of treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 breast-cancer
Started Jan 2010
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 23, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedSeptember 14, 2016
September 1, 2016
4.3 years
November 16, 2010
September 13, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of BRN01 efficacy in reducing hot flash score after 4 weeks of treatment
The hot flash score is equal to: (number of hot flashes/day) x (mean intensity/day). Treatment efficiency scores will be calculated as follows: (hot flash score on the 4th week of the second period)-(hot flash score on the 2nd week of the first period). Then efficiency scores will be compared between the 2 arms (placebo versus BRN01).
The patients are instructed to record the number and intensity of hot flashes in a self-evaluation booklet every day during the 2nd week of the first period (run-in period) and during the 4th week of the second period (placebo or BRN01).
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Evaluation of BRN01 efficacy in reducing the hot flash score after 8 weeks of treatment
The patients are instructed to record the number and intensity of hot flashes in a self-evaluation booklet every day during the 2nd week of the first period (run-in period) and during the 8th week of the second period (placebo or BRN01).
Evaluation of the mean daily intensity of hot flashes during the run-in period and on the 4th and 8th weeks of treatment in both arms.
The patients are instructed to record the intensity of hot flashes in a self-evaluation booklet, daily, during the 2nd week of the first period (run-in period), and during the 4th and 8th weeks of the second period (placebo or BRN01).
Evaluation of the mean daily frequency of hot flashes during the run-in period and on the 4th and 8th weeks of treatment in both arms.
The patients are instructed to record the number of hot flashes in a self-evaluation booklet, daily, during the 2nd week of the first period (run-in period), and during the 4th and 8th weeks of the second period (placebo or BRN01).
Evaluation of quality of life in both arms
The patients are instructed to complete quality of life items on the 7th day of each evaluation period (2nd week of the run-in period, 4th and 8th weeks of the second period)
Evaluation of patient satisfaction with the treatment and with the management of hot flashes.
The patients are instructed to record all new hot flash treatments started, as well as their satisfaction with their management, on the 7th day of each evaluation period (2nd week of the run-in period, 4th and 8th weeks of the second period).
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
BRN01
EXPERIMENTALA 2 to 4 weeks run-in period is planned, during which all patients receive single blinded "hot flash evaluation treatment" which is actually a placebo (2 tablets every morning and every evening during 2 to 4 weeks). At the end of this period, the hot flash score is calculated. If the score is ≥10, the patient can be randomized to one of the 2 arms: * Experimental: BRN01 * Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORA 2 to 4 weeks run-in period is planned, during which all patients receive single blinded "hot flash evaluation treatment" which is actually a placebo (2 tablets every morning and every evening during 2 to 4 weeks). At the end of this period, the hot flash score is calculated. If the score is ≥10, the patient can be randomized to one of the 2 arms: * Experimental: BRN01 * Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Interventions
2 tablets every morning and every evening during 8 to 10 weeks. Each patient will receive 1 set of 5 treatment boxes (60 tablets/box).
2 tablets every morning and every evening during 8 to 10 weeks. Each patient will receive 1 set of 5 treatment boxes (60 tablets/box).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patient aged ≥ 18 years
- Women with histologically proven non metastatic breast cancer
- ECOG PS ≤ 1
- Patient receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy for at least 1 month (aromatase inhibitor or Tamoxifen ± ovarian function suppression (Luteinizing Hormone Releasing Hormone agonist (LH-RH agonist), ovariectomy...))
- Patient agreement not to start another hot flash treatment during the study (allopathic treatment, E vitamin, dietary supplement, phytotherapy, acupuncture...)
- Patient able to understand, read and write French
- Mandatory affiliation with a health insurance system
- Signed, written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Ongoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or treatment planned to begin during the study
- Patient with a condition known to induce hot flashes such as hyperthyroidism, diabetes, adrenal tumor, enteric carcinoid tumor, mastocytosis...
- Patient with severe renal failure, severe hepatic failure, or cardiovascular disease
- Patient with one of the following contraindications:
- known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the study drug
- galactose, fructose intolerance
- Lapp lactase deficiency, isomaltase invertase deficiency
- Glucose or galactose malabsorption syndrome
- Follow up impossible because of social, familial, geographical or psychological reasons
- Patient suspected of poor compliance with protocol or treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre Leon Berardlead
- BOIRONcollaborator
Study Sites (9)
Centre Hospitalier de Chambery
Chambéry, France
Centre Jean Perrin
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Centre Leon Berard
Lyon, 69373, France
Centre Hospitalier de Montelimar
Montélimar, France
Centre Hospitalier d'Annecy
Pringy, France
Centre Hospitalier de Roanne
Roanne, France
Clinique Armoricaine de radiologie
Saint-Brieuc, France
Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
Centre Hospitalier de Valence
Valence, France
Related Publications (26)
Remontet L, Esteve J, Bouvier AM, Grosclaude P, Launoy G, Menegoz F, Exbrayat C, Tretare B, Carli PM, Guizard AV, Troussard X, Bercelli P, Colonna M, Halna JM, Hedelin G, Mace-Lesec'h J, Peng J, Buemi A, Velten M, Jougla E, Arveux P, Le Bodic L, Michel E, Sauvage M, Schvartz C, Faivre J. Cancer incidence and mortality in France over the period 1978-2000. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2003 Feb;51(1 Pt 1):3-30.
PMID: 12684578BACKGROUNDMenegoz F, Black RJ, Arveux P, Magne V, Ferlay J, Buemi A, Carli PM, Chapelain G, Faivre J, Gignoux M, Grosclaude P, Mace-Lesec'h J, Raverdy N, Schaffer P. Cancer incidence and mortality in France in 1975-95. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1997 Oct;6(5):442-66. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199710000-00005.
PMID: 9466116BACKGROUNDColeman MP. Trends in breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality. Lancet. 2000 Aug 12;356(9229):590-1; author reply 593. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02593-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 10950250BACKGROUNDBreast International Group (BIG) 1-98 Collaborative Group; Thurlimann B, Keshaviah A, Coates AS, Mouridsen H, Mauriac L, Forbes JF, Paridaens R, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber RD, Rabaglio M, Smith I, Wardley A, Price KN, Goldhirsch A. A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 29;353(26):2747-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052258.
PMID: 16382061BACKGROUNDFinck G, Barton DL, Loprinzi CL, Quella SK, Sloan JA. Definitions of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1998 Nov;16(5):327-33. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(98)00090-6.
PMID: 9846028BACKGROUNDStearns V, Ullmer L, Lopez JF, Smith Y, Isaacs C, Hayes D. Hot flushes. Lancet. 2002 Dec 7;360(9348):1851-61. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11774-0.
PMID: 12480376BACKGROUNDCouzi RJ, Helzlsouer KJ, Fetting JH. Prevalence of menopausal symptoms among women with a history of breast cancer and attitudes toward estrogen replacement therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1995 Nov;13(11):2737-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.11.2737.
PMID: 7595732BACKGROUNDFellowes D, Fallowfield LJ, Saunders CM, Houghton J. Tolerability of hormone therapies for breast cancer: how informative are documented symptom profiles in medical notes for 'well-tolerated' treatments? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001 Mar;66(1):73-81. doi: 10.1023/a:1010684903199.
PMID: 11368413BACKGROUNDLower EE, Blau R, Gazder P, Tummala R. The risk of premature menopause induced by chemotherapy for early breast cancer. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 1999 Sep;8(7):949-54. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1.1999.8.949.
PMID: 10534297BACKGROUNDMcPhail G, Smith LN. Acute menopause symptoms during adjuvant systemic treatment for breast cancer: a case-control study. Cancer Nurs. 2000 Dec;23(6):430-43. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200012000-00005.
PMID: 11128122BACKGROUNDLoprinzi CL, Zahasky KM, Sloan JA, Novotny PJ, Quella SK. Tamoxifen-induced hot flashes. Clin Breast Cancer. 2000 Apr;1(1):52-6. doi: 10.3816/cbc.2000.n.004.
PMID: 11899390BACKGROUNDLove RR, Cameron L, Connell BL, Leventhal H. Symptoms associated with tamoxifen treatment in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern Med. 1991 Sep;151(9):1842-7.
PMID: 1888251BACKGROUNDLinde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV, Jonas WB. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet. 1997 Sep 20;350(9081):834-43. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)02293-9.
PMID: 9310601BACKGROUNDJonas WB, Kaptchuk TJ, Linde K. A critical overview of homeopathy. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Mar 4;138(5):393-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-5-200303040-00009.
PMID: 12614092BACKGROUNDCucherat M, Haugh MC, Gooch M, Boissel JP. Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy. A meta-analysis of clinical trials. HMRAG. Homeopathic Medicines Research Advisory Group. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Apr;56(1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s002280050716.
PMID: 10853874BACKGROUNDJonas WB. Researching alternative medicine. Nat Med. 1997 Aug;3(8):824-7. doi: 10.1038/nm0897-824. No abstract available.
PMID: 9256264BACKGROUNDGuyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1993 Dec 1;270(21):2598-601. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.21.2598. No abstract available.
PMID: 8230645BACKGROUNDGrol R, Grimshaw J. Evidence-based implementation of evidence-based medicine. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Oct;25(10):503-13. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30464-3.
PMID: 10522231BACKGROUNDBarnes J, Ernst E. Complementary medicine. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 May;47(418):329. No abstract available.
PMID: 9219418BACKGROUNDClover A, Ratsey D. Homeopathic treatment of hot flushes: a pilot study. Homeopathy. 2002 Apr;91(2):75-9. doi: 10.1054/homp.2002.0004.
PMID: 12371460BACKGROUNDThompson EA, Reilly D. The homeopathic approach to the treatment of symptoms of oestrogen withdrawal in breast cancer patients. A prospective observational study. Homeopathy. 2003 Jul;92(3):131-4. doi: 10.1016/s1475-4916(03)00035-3.
PMID: 12884894BACKGROUNDThompson EA, Montgomery A, Douglas D, Reilly D. A pilot, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of individualized homeopathy for symptoms of estrogen withdrawal in breast-cancer survivors. J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Feb;11(1):13-20. doi: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.13.
PMID: 15750359BACKGROUNDRelton C, Weatherley-Jones E. Homeopathy service in a National Health Service community menopause clinic: audit of clinical outcomes. J Br Menopause Soc. 2005 Jun;11(2):72-3. doi: 10.1258/136218005775544516.
PMID: 15970019BACKGROUNDBordet MF, Colas A, Marijnen P, Masson J, Trichard M. Treating hot flushes in menopausal women with homeopathic treatment--results of an observational study. Homeopathy. 2008 Jan;97(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2007.11.005.
PMID: 18194760BACKGROUNDSloan JA, Loprinzi CL, Novotny PJ, Barton DL, Lavasseur BI, Windschitl H. Methodologic lessons learned from hot flash studies. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Dec 1;19(23):4280-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.23.4280.
PMID: 11731510BACKGROUNDHeudel PE, Van Praagh-Doreau I, Duvert B, Cauvin I, Hardy-Bessard AC, Jacquin JP, Stefani L, Vincent L, Dramais D, Guastalla JP, Blanc E, Belleville A, Lavergne E, Perol D. Does a homeopathic medicine reduce hot flushes induced by adjuvant endocrine therapy in localized breast cancer patients? A multicenter randomized placebo-controlled phase III trial. Support Care Cancer. 2019 May;27(5):1879-1889. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4449-x. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
PMID: 30194492DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pierre Etienne Heudel, MD
Centre Leon Berard, France
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2010
First Posted
November 23, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 14, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09