No Need for Neuromuscular Blockade in Daycase Laparoscopic Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
1,245
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study analyse the need for neuromuscular blockade in consecutive routine laparoscopic procedures without standard use of neuromuscular blockade in an ambulatory laparoscopic surgery setting and analyse specific reasons for using neuromuscular blockade in individual patients. Furthermore, the study report the analgesic use in postoperative care unit and the discharge rate.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2016
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedMay 29, 2018
May 1, 2018
1 month
February 15, 2016
May 25, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients requiring neuromuscular blockade
Data derived from a prospective local database on need for neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, umbilical and inguinal hernia repair.
At time of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Analgesic use in postoperative care unit
Within 6 hours after surgery
Hours stayed in the postoperative care unit
1 to 6 hours after surgery
Maximum Visual analog score (VAS) for pain in the postoperative Care unit
1 to 6 hours after surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Retrospective study, including consecutive patients in an unrestricted referral of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, umbilical and inguinal hernia repair
You may qualify if:
- patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, umbilical and inguinal hernia repair
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (10)
Staehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, Juul P, Lindekaer AL, Riber C, Gatke MR. Surgical space conditions during low-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy with deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade: a randomized clinical study. Anesth Analg. 2014 Nov;119(5):1084-92. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000316.
PMID: 24977638BACKGROUNDStaehr-Rye AK, Rasmussen LS, Rosenberg J, Juul P, Gatke MR. Optimized surgical space during low-pressure laparoscopy with deep neuromuscular blockade. Dan Med J. 2013 Feb;60(2):A4579.
PMID: 23461992BACKGROUNDMartini CH, Boon M, Bevers RF, Aarts LP, Dahan A. Evaluation of surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery in patients with moderate vs deep neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Mar;112(3):498-505. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet377. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
PMID: 24240315BACKGROUNDKopman AF, Naguib M. Laparoscopic surgery and muscle relaxants: is deep block helpful? Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan;120(1):51-58. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000471.
PMID: 25625254BACKGROUNDAbrishami A, Ho J, Wong J, Yin L, Chung F. Sugammadex, a selective reversal medication for preventing postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD007362. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007362.pub2.
PMID: 19821409BACKGROUNDBarczynski M, Herman RM. A prospective randomized trial on comparison of low-pressure (LP) and standard-pressure (SP) pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2003 Apr;17(4):533-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9121-2. Epub 2003 Feb 17.
PMID: 12582754BACKGROUNDWallace DH, Serpell MG, Baxter JN, O'Dwyer PJ. Randomized trial of different insufflation pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997 Apr;84(4):455-8.
PMID: 9112891BACKGROUNDPerrakis E, Vezakis A, Velimezis G, Savanis G, Deverakis S, Antoniades J, Sagkana E. Randomized comparison between different insufflation pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003 Aug;13(4):245-9. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200308000-00004.
PMID: 12960786BACKGROUNDLarsen JF, Ejstrud P, Kristensen JU, Svendsen F, Redke F, Pedersen V. Randomized comparison of conventional and gasless laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative technique, postoperative course, and recovery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2001 May-Jun;5(3):330-5. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)80056-1.
PMID: 11360058BACKGROUNDLoven H, Kristensen BB, Bisgaard T. Low admittance rate after ambulatory laparoscopic surgery. Dan Med J. 2019 Jun;66(6):A5547.
PMID: 31256774DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Billy B Kristensen, MD
Hvidovre University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2016
First Posted
May 25, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share